Origins of Pulsing Regime in Cocurrent Packed-Bed Flows

The mechanism of the formation for cocurrent downflow pulse flow was studied experimentally in a packed bed of inert spheres of 3, 6, and 8 mm using an air−water flow. By measurement of the flow distance until pulses are observed, the spatial growth rate of convective disturbances within the pulsing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial & engineering chemistry research Vol. 44; no. 16; pp. 6056 - 6066
Main Authors: Wilhite, B. A, Blackwell, B, Kacmar, J, Varma, A, McCready, M. J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC American Chemical Society 03-08-2005
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The mechanism of the formation for cocurrent downflow pulse flow was studied experimentally in a packed bed of inert spheres of 3, 6, and 8 mm using an air−water flow. By measurement of the flow distance until pulses are observed, the spatial growth rate of convective disturbances within the pulsing flow regime were determined. Observations indicate that pulses form from trickling flow as the result of a global convective instability. Further, experiments indicate that an analogous transition exists for the formation of pulses from the dispersed bubble flow regime, except that pulses form as the flow rates are adjusted to become less severe. Existing global instability models based on averaged (dispersed flow) momentum equations were modified to explain experimental results. A key uncertainty in modeling pulse formation from trickle flow is the regularization (i.e., stabilization) force. Re-examination of this issue suggests some mechanistic inconsistencies with surface tension which had been used in previous studies. Consistent with the present experiments, it is proposed that gravity may be the primary restoring force. Incorporating gravity stabilization into the dispersed flow equations provides predictions that are at least as good as the previous models. A similar dispersed flow model is used to explain the bubbly flow to pulse transition. While predictions agree with experimental data for part of the range, model accuracy is limited by the accuracy of constitutive expressions for interaction forces between phases.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/TPS-PCZXRBGP-N
istex:0AEF83631A132A9249CF7421DA0106382168266E
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0888-5885
1520-5045
DOI:10.1021/ie049187j