Calibrating the amplitude source location (ASL) method by using active seismic sources: An example from Te Maari volcano, Tongariro National Park, New Zealand

Abstract A frequently applied amplitude source location (ASL) method is here calibrated and optimized by using active seismic sources located at the surface of a dry stream channel. The ASL produced location discrepancies larger than 1.0 km laterally and 500 m in depth by using independently determi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters Vol. 44; no. 8; pp. 3591 - 3599
Main Authors: Walsh, B., Jolly, A. D., Procter, J.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington John Wiley & Sons, Inc 28-04-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract A frequently applied amplitude source location (ASL) method is here calibrated and optimized by using active seismic sources located at the surface of a dry stream channel. The ASL produced location discrepancies larger than 1.0 km laterally and 500 m in depth by using independently determined velocity model, attenuation, and site amplification factors (AFs). Sensitivity tests for ASL input parameters show that attenuation and velocity have moderate influence on the location but are easy to independently constrain. AFs are shown to strongly influence the location, and their application may introduce substantial location uncertainties. Model uncertainties are accommodated with either lateral or depth changes depending on the input parameters, station corrections, and the source‐station geometry. Key Points First calibration of amplitude source location (ASL) method using active seismic sources Application of known velocity and decay model constraints provide substantial location improvements Standard errors from amplification factors (AFs) yield substantial ASL location errors
ISSN:0094-8276
1944-8007
DOI:10.1002/2017GL073000