Comparative Studies on Enhanced Oil Recovery: Thermoviscosifying Polymer Versus Polyacrylamide

• Published in: Energy & fuels Vol. 31; no. 3; pp. 2479 - 2487
• Main Authors: Li, Xian’e, Xu, Zhi, Yin, Hongyao, Feng, Yujun, Quan, Hongping
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: American Chemical Society 16-03-2017
• ISSN: 0887-0624; 1520-5029
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02653

High-molecular-weight polyacrylamide (PAM) has been widely used in chemically enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes under mild conditions, but its poor tolerance to high temperature and high salinity impeded the use in severe oil reservoirs. To overcome the inadequacies of PAM, thermoviscosifying polymers (TVPs) whose viscosity increases upon increasing temperature and salinity were developed in recent years. In this work, comparative studies with PAM and TVP, having more similar molecular weights, were performed with regard to their rheological behaviors, thermal stability, and core flooding feasibility. It was found that the TVP aqueous solution exhibited thermothickening ability, even at a polymer concentration of 0.2 wt % with a total dissolved solids ratio (TDS) of 101 000 mg L–1 upon increasing temperature, while PAM only showed a monotonic decrease in viscosity under identical conditions. Remaining viscosity of TVP was higher than that of PAM after aging at 45 or 85 °C for one month. Core flooding tests demonstrated both polymers show good transportation in porous media, and a higher oil recovery of 16.4% and 15.5% can be attained by TVP at 45 and 85 °C, respectively, while those of PAM are only 12.0% and 9.20%.