Sustained Effect of Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus on Development and Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy: The Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) Study

CONTEXT The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated the benefits of intensive treatment of diabetes in reducing glycemic levels and slowing the progression of diabetic nephropathy. The DCCT cohort has been examined annually for another 8 years as part of the follow-up Epidemiolo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 290; no. 16; pp. 2159 - 2167
Main Authors: Steffes, Michael W, Chavers, Blanche M, Molitch, Mark E, Cleary, Patricia A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chicago, IL American Medical Association 22-10-2003
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:CONTEXT The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) demonstrated the benefits of intensive treatment of diabetes in reducing glycemic levels and slowing the progression of diabetic nephropathy. The DCCT cohort has been examined annually for another 8 years as part of the follow-up Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study. During the EDIC study, glycemic levels no longer differed substantially between the 2 original treatment groups. OBJECTIVE To determine the long-term effects of intensive vs conventional diabetes treatment during the DCCT on kidney function during the EDIC study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Observational study begun in 1993 (following DCCT closeout) in 28 medical centers in the United States and Canada. Participants were 1349 (of 1375) EDIC volunteers who had kidney evaluation at years 7 or 8. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Development of microalbuminuria, clinical-grade albuminuria, hypertension, or increase in serum creatinine level. RESULTS Results were analyzed by intention-to-treat analyses, comparing the 2 original DCCT treatment groups. New cases of microalbuminuria occurred during the EDIC study in 39 (6.8%) of the participants originally assigned to the intensive-treatment group vs 87 (15.8%) of those assigned to the conventional-treatment group, for a 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39%-73%) reduction in odds, adjusted for baseline values, compared with a 59% (95% CI, 36%-74%) reduction at the end of the DCCT (P<.001 for both comparisons). New cases of clinical albuminuria occurred in 9 (1.4%) of the participants in the original intensive-treatment group vs 59 (9.4%) of those in the original conventional-treatment group, representing an 84% reduction in odds (95% CI, 67%-92%), compared with a reduction of 57% (95% CI, −1% to +81%) at the end of the DCCT. Fewer cases of hypertension (prevalence at year 8, 29.9% vs 40.3%; P<.001) developed in the original intensive-treatment group. Significantly fewer participants reached a serum creatinine level of 2 mg/dL or greater in the intensive-treatment vs the conventional-treatment group (5 vs 19, P = .004), but there were no differences in mean log clearance values. Although small numbers of patients required dialysis and/or transplantation, fewer patients experienced either of these outcomes in the intensive group (4 vs 7, P = .36). CONCLUSIONS The persistent beneficial effects on albumin excretion and the reduced incidence of hypertension 7 to 8 years after the end of the DCCT suggest that previous intensive treatment of diabetes with near-normal glycemia during the DCCT has an extended benefit in delaying progression of diabetic nephropathy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Statistical expertise: Cleary, Lachin.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Chavers, Cleary.
Study supervision: Molitch, Cleary, Genuth, Nathan. Laboratory expertise: Steffes.
Acquistition of data: Molitfch, Chavers, Cleary, Nathan. Analysis and interpretation of data; critical refvision of the manuscript for important intellectual content; Steffes, Molitch, chavers, Cleary, Lachin, Genuth, Nathan.
Obtained funding: Cleary.
Drafting of the manuscript: Steffes, Molitch, Cleary, Genuth.
Author Contribution: Study concept and design: Steffes, Molitch, Cleary, Lachin, Genuth, Nathan.
ISSN:0098-7484
1538-3598
DOI:10.1001/jama.290.16.2159