Real-Time Infrared Determination of Photoinitiated Copolymerization Reactivity Ratios:  Application of the Hilbert Transform and Critical Evaluation of Data Analysis Techniques

The reactivity ratios of various UV-copolymerizing systems were determined employing RT-FTIR spectroscopy, combined with advanced and alternative multivariate-statistical data analysis techniques. For complex mixtures peak identification as well as peak deconvolution has been increased significantly...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Macromolecules Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 2275 - 2286
Main Authors: Jansen, Johan F. G. A, Houben, Erwin E. J. E, Tummers, Peter H. G, Wienke, Dietrich, Hoffmann, John
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC American Chemical Society 23-03-2004
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The reactivity ratios of various UV-copolymerizing systems were determined employing RT-FTIR spectroscopy, combined with advanced and alternative multivariate-statistical data analysis techniques. For complex mixtures peak identification as well as peak deconvolution has been increased significantly by employment of 2-dimensional correlation spectroscopy, based on the Hilbert transform. As an advantage, kinetic reaction profiles of homo- and copolymerization reactions have been extracted and have been separated without any additional measurement. The following reactivity ratios were obtained:  fumarate/vinyl ether r 1 = 0, r 2 = 0; maleate/vinyl ether r 1 = 0, r 2 = 0; fumarate/allyl ether r 1 = 0, r 2 = 0; maleate/allyl ether r 1 = 0, r 2 = 0; fumarate/methacrylate r 1 = 0, r 2 = 1.3; fumarate/acrylate r 1 = 0, r 2 > 50; methacrylate/vinyl ether r 1 = 16, r 2 = 0; methacrylate/allyl ether r 1 > 100, r 2 = 0; methacrylate/acrylate r 1 = 1.6, r 2 = 0.15; methacrylate/N-vinylcaprolactam r 1 = 7.3, r 2 = 0.01; and acrylate/N-vinylcaprolactam r 1 = 1.3, r 2 = 0.01. Kinetically, the fumarate−vinyl ether copolymerization can be regarded as the homopolymerization of a CT complex while the fumarate allyl ether copolymerization should be regarded as a perfect alternating copolymerization. The HEA−NVC copolymerization has to be regarded as a terpolymerization between HEA, NVC, and the HEA−NVC charge-transfer complex.
Bibliography:istex:96F3A34D986F8A21109BCBB0EDD5043E800AC5C8
ark:/67375/TPS-454RMDHK-Z
ISSN:0024-9297
1520-5835
DOI:10.1021/ma035587r