Bonding and Magnetic Trends in the [AnIII(DPA)3]3– Series Compared to the Ln(III) and An(IV) Analogues

The crystal field parameters are determined from first-principles calculations in the [AnIII(DPA)3]3– series, completing previous work on the [LnIII(DPA)3]3– and [AnIV(DPA)3]2– series. The crystal field strength parameter follows the Ln­(III) < An­(III) < An­(IV) trend. The parameters deduced...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Inorganic chemistry Vol. 62; no. 42; pp. 17254 - 17264
Main Authors: Islam, Md. Ashraful, Berthon, Claude, Jung, Julie, Bolvin, Hélène
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: American Chemical Society 23-10-2023
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The crystal field parameters are determined from first-principles calculations in the [AnIII(DPA)3]3– series, completing previous work on the [LnIII(DPA)3]3– and [AnIV(DPA)3]2– series. The crystal field strength parameter follows the Ln­(III) < An­(III) < An­(IV) trend. The parameters deduced at the orbital level decrease along the series, while J-mixing strongly impacts the many-electron parameters, especially for the Pu­(III) complex. We further compile the available data for the three series. In some aspects, An­(III) complexes are closer to Ln­(III) than to An­(IV) complexes with regard to the geometrical structure and bonding descriptors. At the beginning of the series, up to Pu­(III), there is a quantitative departure from the free ion, especially for the Pa­(III) complex. The magnetic properties of the actinides keep the trends of the lanthanides; in particular, the axial magnetic susceptibility follows Bleaney’s theory qualitatively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0020-1669
1520-510X
DOI:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02482