Effect of Far-Red Light on Biomass Accumulation, Plant Morphology, and Phytonutrient Composition of Ruby Streaks Mustard at Microgreen, Baby Leaf, and Flowering Stages

• Published in: Journal of agricultural and food chemistry Vol. 72; no. 17; pp. 9587 - 9598
• Main Authors: Teng, Zi, Luo, Yaguang, Sun, Jianghao, Li, Yanfang, Pearlstein, Daniel J., Oehler, Madison A., Fitzwater, James D., Zhou, Bin, Chang, Christine Y., Hassan, Muhammad Adeel, Chen, Pei, Wang, Qin, Fonseca, Jorge M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States American Chemical Society 01-05-2024
• Subjects: Agricultural and Environmental Chemistry; Anthocyanins - analysis; Biomass; Flowers - chemistry; Flowers - growth & development; Flowers - radiation effects; Mustard Plant - chemistry; Mustard Plant - growth & development; Mustard Plant - radiation effects; Photosynthesis - radiation effects; Phytochemicals - chemistry; Plant Leaves - chemistry; Plant Leaves - growth & development; Plant Leaves - radiation effects; Red Light; far-red light; controlled environment agriculture; metabolomics; edible flowers; microgreens; baby leaves
• ISSN: 0021-8561; 1520-5118; 1520-5118
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c06834

Far-red (FR) light influences plant development significantly through shade avoidance response and photosynthetic modulation, but there is limited knowledge on how FR treatments influence the growth and nutrition of vegetables at different maturity stages in controlled environment agriculture (CEA). Here, we comprehensively investigated the impacts of FR on the yield, morphology, and phytonutrients of ruby streaks mustard (RS) at microgreen, baby leaf, and flowering stages. Treatments including white control, white with supplementary FR, white followed by singularly applied FR, and enhanced white (WE) matching the extended daily light integral (eDLI) of FR were designed for separating the effects of light intensity and quality. Results showed that singular and supplemental FR affected plant development and nutrition similarly throughout the growth cycle, with light intensity and quality playing varying roles at different stages. Specifically, FR did not affect the fresh and dry weight of microgreens but increased those values for baby leaves, although not as effectively as WE. Meanwhile, FR caused significant morphological change and accelerated the development of leaves, flowers, and seedpods more dramatically than WE. With regard to phytonutrients, light treatments affected the metabolomic profiles for baby leaves more dramatically than microgreens and flowers. FR decreased the glucosinolate and anthocyanin contents in microgreens and baby leaves, while WE increased the contents of those compounds in baby leaves. This study illustrates the complex impacts of FR on RS and provides valuable information for selecting optimal lighting conditions in CEA.