Magmatic and hydrothermal evolution of mafic pegmatites and their host basalts, Paraná Large Igneous Province, Brazil

• Published in: Lithos Vol. 408-409; p. 106547
• Main Authors: Gomes, Allan Silva, Vasconcelos, Paulo Marcos, Ubide, Teresa, Vasconcellos, Eleonora Maria Gouvêa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01-01-2022
• Subjects: 40Ar/39Ar geochronology; Celadonite; Hydrothermal alteration; Mafic pegmatites; Mafic segregations; Magmatic differentiation; Paraná Large Igneous Province; Mafic segregations; Hydrothermal alteration; Celadonite; 40Ar/39Ar geochronology; Paraná Large Igneous Province; Magmatic differentiation; Mafic pegmatites
• ISSN: 0024-4937; 1872-6143
• DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2021.106547

The high-Ti Paranapanema sequence in the Paraná Large Igneous Province consists of a succession of pahoehoe lava flows. Some of these flows host mafic segregation structures, such as horizontal pegmatitic sheet layers and vesicular cylinders. Geochronology, whole-rock and mineral chemistry of two pegmatite occurrences and their host basalts permit characterizing crystal-melt segregation processes that occur during magmatic differentiation after lava flow emplacement. The mineralogy of the pegmatites is similar to that of the host basalts, and it includes plagioclase, pyroxene and titanomagnetite-ilmenite crystals; the only observable difference is the coarser grain size of primary phases and an increase in the volume fraction of clay minerals derived from glass devitrification and vesicle infilling in the pegmatites (~15 vol% clay in the pegmatites vs. ~6 vol% clay in the basalts). The pegmatites from both sites are more fractionated than the enclosing lavas and are enriched in TiO2, FeOtotal, K2O, P2O5 and incompatible trace elements (e.g., Ba, Rb, Nb, Hf, Y, Zr, La, Ce, Yb). Thermodynamic modeling of whole-rock compositional data suggests that the Barracão pegmatites were formed after ~8–27 wt% fractional crystallization of the host basalt, whereas the Capanema pegmatites formed after ~38–43 wt% fractional crystallization of the host basalt. 40Ar/39Ar geochronology indicates slight yet significant age differences between plagioclase phenocrysts from the pegmatites and whole-rock fragments from the enclosing lavas (Capanema: 133.56 ± 0.52 pegmatite vs. 134.30 ± 0.46 Ma enclosing lava; Barracão: 133.23 ± 0.88 pegmatite vs. 134.49 ± 0.31 Ma enclosing lava). These age differences likely result from hydrothermal alteration of the plagioclase phenocrysts (e.g., secondary albite and K-feldspar), and they are not due to resolvable differences in crystallization age. Smectite-celadonite aggregates recovered from the Capanema basalt suggest that hydrothermalism occurred at 123.18 ± 0.61 Ma, approximately ten million years after rock crystallization.
•The high-Ti Paranapanema sequence in the Paraná LIP hosts mafic pegmatites.•Mafic pegmatites form during magmatic differentiation after lava flow emplacement.•Mafic pegmatites are fractionated liquids from their host basalts.•Age discrepancies between mafic pegmatites and host lavas result from alteration.•The Capanema and Barracão flows were emplaced at 134.31 ± 0.37 and 134.49 ± 0.31 Ma