Unrelated donor transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide versus ATG for myelodysplastic neoplasms

• Published in: Blood advances
• Main Authors: Chalandon, Yves, Eikema, Diderik-Jan, Moiseev, Ivan Sergeevich, Ciceri, Fabio, Koster, Linda, Vydra, Jan, Passweg, Jakob R, Rovira, Montserrat, Ozcelik, Tulay, Gedde-Dahl, Tobias, Kröger, Nicolaus, Potter, Victoria, Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim, Rambaldi, Alessandro, Itälä-Remes, Maija, Tanase, Alina D, Onida, Francesco, Gurnari, Carmelo, Scheid, Christof, Drozd-Sokolowska, Joanna, Raj, Kavita, McLornan, Donal P, Robin, Marie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 15-07-2024
• ISSN: 2473-9537

Prospective randomized trials have reported a benefit for anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) with unrelated donors (UD). However, the optimal GvHD prophylaxis strategy has been recently challenged by the increasing use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY). We report from the EBMT registry the outcomes of 960 patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) undergoing allo-HSCT from UD with PTCY or ATG as GvHD prophylaxis. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Disease characteristics were similar in both groups. Day 28 neutrophil engraftment was significantly better with ATG (93% vs 85%, p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 4.4 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2 - 4.8), 5-year OS was 58% (95% CI 50-65) with PTCY and 49% (95% CI 46-53%) in the ATG group, p=0.07. 5-year PFS was higher for PTCY with 53% (95% CI 45-60) vs 44% (95% CI 40-48) for ATG, p=0.043. Grade II-IV aGvHD incidence was lower using PTCY (23% [95% CI 17-29%] vs 30% [95% CI 27-33%]), p=0.044 while there was no difference in incidence of cGvHD at 5 years. Multivariable analyses confirmed better OS and PFS with PTCY, with a HR for ATG of 1.32 (1 - 1.74), p=0.05, and a better PFS for PTCY with a HR for ATG of 1.33 (1.03 - 1.73), p=0.03. This study suggests that GvHD prophylaxis using PTCY instead of ATG in this setting remains a valid option. Further prospective randomized studies would be essential to confirm these results.