Fracture planning is easy: Development of a basic method of digital planning based on the traditional pencil and paper technique

• Published in: Revista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología Vol. 66; no. 5; pp. 328 - 340
• Main Authors: Galán-Olleros, M, García-Coiradas, J, Llanos, S, Valle-Cruz, J A, Marco, F
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English; Spanish
• Published: 01-09-2022
• DOI: 10.1016/j.recot.2021.05.002
• EISSN: 1988-8856

INTRODUCTIONPreoperative planning constitutes a fundamental tool in the management of fractures; however, its practical application is far from the desired, perhaps due to the absence of a basic and simple method, adapted to the current times. We describe a digital planning method, halfway between the traditional and the technological, which preserves its educational essence, allows the understanding of the fracture and the individualization of the osteosynthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODSAfter the initial analysis of the fracture and the patient's characteristics, different measurements are made on X-ray and CT images with a digital medical imaging software. These images are then copied into a presentation program (Microsoft® PowerPoint or Keynote ©Apple Inc.), in which the main fragments and fracture lines are traced with the computer pointer. These are subsequently moved into a reduced position and the implants for internal fixation are graphically represented together with a guide of the surgical strategy. RESULTSWe show 4 cases of different types of fractures operated through reduction and osteosynthesis after preoperative planning according to the described method. The basic points for the surgical planning, logistics, tactics and postoperative radiological results of each case are detailed. CONCLUSIONSDespite rise of advanced planning software, traditional paper and pencil methods are still fundamental, even more so for the trauma surgeon in training. The digital planning method described is very appropriate for this purpose, as it combines the advantages of both methods: simplicity, accessibility, quickness, low-cost, reproducibility, educational character, efficiency and possibility of simulation, corrections and reuse of cases.