Effect of Variety on Proportion of Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value of Different Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Relationship between Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value

Five varieties of napiergrasses (Pennisetum purpureum) were fractionated botanically into leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem and head. Chemical composition of each of whole napiergrass and their botanical fractions were determined. Correlation, linear and multiple regressions between botanical fractions...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences Vol. 16; no. 6; pp. 837 - 842
Main Authors: Islam, M.R, Saha, C.K, Sarker, N.R, Jalil, M.A, Hasanuzzaman, M
Format: Journal Article
Language:Korean
Published: 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Five varieties of napiergrasses (Pennisetum purpureum) were fractionated botanically into leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem and head. Chemical composition of each of whole napiergrass and their botanical fractions were determined. Correlation, linear and multiple regressions between botanical fractions and nutritive value of varieties of napiergrass were also estimated. All botanical fractions differed due to the effect of variety. Napier Pusha contained the highest proportion of leaf blade and internode, but the lowest proportion of leaf sheath. Napier Hybrid contained the lowest proportion of leaf blade, but highest proportion of node. Consequently, napier Pusha contained the highest (p<0.01) crude protein (CP, 9.0%), but Napier Hybrid had the lowest CP (7.0%). Chemical composition of whole plant differed significantly (p<0.01; except NFE, p>0.05) due to the variety. Not only the whole plant, chemical composition of most botanical fractions of whole plant differed (p<0.05 to 0.01) due to the variety. The intrarelationships between leaf blade and leaf sheath was negative (r=-0.43). Leaf sheath was also negatively correlated to CP, but positively correlated to ash of whole Napier or their botanical fractions. Leaf blade, on the other hand, increases CP but decreases ash content of whole plant or their fractions. These results, therefore, suggest that napiergrass varieties differ widely in terms of botanical fractions and nutritive value, which may have important implications on intake and productivity of animals. Furthermore, napiergrass varieties should be selected for leaf blade only for a better response.
AbstractList Five varieties of napiergrasses (Pennisetum purpureum) were fractionated botanically into leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem and head. Chemical composition of each of whole napiergrass and their botanical fractions were determined. Correlation, linear and multiple regressions between botanical fractions and nutritive value of varieties of napiergrass were also estimated. All botanical fractions differed due to the effect of variety. Napier Pusha contained the highest proportion of leaf blade and internode, but the lowest proportion of leaf sheath. Napier Hybrid contained the lowest proportion of leaf blade, but highest proportion of node. Consequently, napier Pusha contained the highest (p<0.01) crude protein (CP, 9.0%), but Napier Hybrid had the lowest CP (7.0%). Chemical composition of whole plant differed significantly (p<0.01; except NFE, p>0.05) due to the variety. Not only the whole plant, chemical composition of most botanical fractions of whole plant differed (p<0.05 to 0.01) due to the variety. The intrarelationships between leaf blade and leaf sheath was negative (r=-0.43). Leaf sheath was also negatively correlated to CP, but positively correlated to ash of whole Napier or their botanical fractions. Leaf blade, on the other hand, increases CP but decreases ash content of whole plant or their fractions. These results, therefore, suggest that napiergrass varieties differ widely in terms of botanical fractions and nutritive value, which may have important implications on intake and productivity of animals. Furthermore, napiergrass varieties should be selected for leaf blade only for a better response.
Author Sarker, N.R
Hasanuzzaman, M
Islam, M.R
Jalil, M.A
Saha, C.K
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Islam, M.R
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Saha, C.K
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Sarker, N.R
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Jalil, M.A
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Hasanuzzaman, M
BookMark eNqNkN1KA0EMhQepYNW-Q24EvViY2XF37aU_LUWhLUW8LdNtVoPTzDI_is_myzktPkAhkMPJyRfIuRiwYzwRQzVu6qKqVDPIWipVlLpuzsQoBNrISjblWNX1UPxOug7bCK6DN-MJ4w84hqV3vfORssyDBxcNU2ssTL1p924Aw1uYp-gp0hfmVZtwH32ijPPIEeamJ_Tv3oQA10tkpoAx7aBPPhem3c2BsUJrDsQP6mGD8RuRjz14KU47YwOO_vuFuJpOXh9nxSeFSGveBrt-vn9ZlFLq_AKpbytd3ml9bO4PIZFo7A
ContentType Journal Article
DBID JDI
DEWEY 636
DatabaseName KoreaScience
DatabaseTitleList
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Veterinary Medicine
Agriculture
DocumentTitleAlternate Effect of Variety on Proportion of Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value of Different Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Relationship between Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value
EISSN 1976-5517
EndPage 842
ExternalDocumentID JAKO200310103453283
GroupedDBID 23N
2XV
5GY
9ZL
AAFWJ
ABDBF
ACYCR
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
AFPKN
AGJBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
DIK
EBS
EJD
GJPHO
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
IAG
IAO
ICW
IPNFZ
ISR
ITC
JDI
KQ8
KVFHK
M48
N95
OK1
P2P
PV9
RIG
RPM
RZL
SJN
XI7
~KM
ID FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2003101034532833
ISSN 1011-2367
IngestDate Fri Dec 22 11:59:15 EST 2023
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly false
Issue 6
Keywords Botanical Fractions
Selection
Napier
Leaf Blade
Variety
Language Korean
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2003101034532833
Notes KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO200310103453283
OpenAccessLink http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO200310103453283&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01
ParticipantIDs kisti_ndsl_JAKO200310103453283
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2003
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2003-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 2003
  text: 2003
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationTitle Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences
PublicationTitleAlternate Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences
PublicationYear 2003
SSID ssib050729166
ssib053376654
ssj0054278
Score 2.708387
Snippet Five varieties of napiergrasses (Pennisetum purpureum) were fractionated botanically into leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem and head. Chemical composition of each...
SourceID kisti
SourceType Open Access Repository
StartPage 837
Title Effect of Variety on Proportion of Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value of Different Napiergrass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Relationship between Botanical Fractions and Nutritive Value
URI http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/LinkingDetailView?cn=JAKO200310103453283&dbt=JAKO&org_code=O481&site_code=SS1481&service_code=01
Volume 16
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LT8JAEN4gJz0YRY1PsgdNNKaEPqBwrDxCMKAJhHgjfUGM0JJC_XP-OWd2l-1ijOLBS0OW7TbtfJn9ZnfmW0KudcyzsO2J5pWtQLOCianVakFd83XXgjt8I3SxdrgzsPsvtWbLauVyazmerO1fLQ1tYGusnP2DteWg0AC_weZwBavDdSu7Czli4IAjDIMx4SLCcgDk2YIcPsTACJlx2gmva-BCzX2uzP8ewq2zlC0mNMX5KStwwwuYQacJkG1kpc-YFbMMV-n8fgG2SpMQD0yui3pHkWCnJoJt-VCVLDtY4Km5arWnInQBo83XFZ1-lgkpMd4ryU2sgcu3tRqlbFEX05ISXmsm-3UhKJnxe52N5RBT8d242ouCdHxq423AtjQghfaGw68qwFa9d820VSLAZb82Nbq_zJ0yo7HrPD4ZTGdVL5tWxQTWhooKwN7Axw66_bWPq6BSu55RaGDbdpVJ2nH2UMGjT9gOvXgZCJowknhVWM_wgOyLcIU6HGeHJPcWF8ieM02EZEtYIIURZlSxsm7aE5kaR-SD45DGEypwSOOIZjjEPyQkqIQEBUhQCQnKIIFdJQ6pgkN6m6GQShTesTFUDFKBwW0feExu2q1ho6OxTzKOguVs_M2XN09IPoqj8JRQr-7ZrlHxjQmQ0aBseUYIAY_ngRVgZq_aZ6T481jnv3W4ILsswZMty12S_CpJwyuyswzSIrP8J0dKn14
link.rule.ids 230,315,782,786,887,4028
linkProvider Multiple Vendors
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+of+Variety+on+Proportion+of+Botanical+Fractions+and+Nutritive+Value+of+Different+Napiergrass+%28Pennisetum+purpureum%29+and+Relationship+between+Botanical+Fractions+and+Nutritive+Value&rft.jtitle=Asian-australasian+journal+of+animal+sciences&rft.au=Islam%2C+M.R&rft.au=Saha%2C+C.K&rft.au=Sarker%2C+N.R&rft.au=Jalil%2C+M.A&rft.date=2003&rft.issn=1011-2367&rft.eissn=1976-5517&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=842&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=JAKO200310103453283
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1011-2367&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1011-2367&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1011-2367&client=summon