Una aproximación al conflicto chileno-mapuche: una nomenclatura sobre conflictos intratables
At present there is no clear consensus on the use of a nomenclature to refer to the type of conflict with the Mapuche people in southern Chile. The most commonly used concepts are rural violence and terrorism. It is argued that the use of these concepts has generated a hermeneutical confusion. This...
Saved in:
Published in: | Revista enfoques : ciencia politíca y administración pública Vol. 22; no. 40; pp. 14 - 30 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | At present there is no clear consensus on the use of a nomenclature to refer to the type of conflict with the Mapuche people in southern Chile. The most commonly used concepts are rural violence and terrorism. It is argued that the use of these concepts has generated a hermeneutical confusion. This has led to an emphasis on thinking that the central issue of the conflict is public security and not the historical indigenous demands. It is proposed that the category of Intractable Conflicts can help overcome this confusion and provide a better understanding of the conflict.
En la actualidad no existe un consenso claro sobre el uso de una nomenclatura para referirse al tipo de conflicto con el pueblo mapuche en el sur de Chile. Los conceptos más utilizados son violencia rural y terrorismo. Se argumenta que el uso de estos conceptos ha generado una confusión hermenéutica. Esto ha llevado a pensar que el tema central del conflicto es la seguridad pública y no las demandas históricas del pueblo mapuche. Se propone que la categoría de Daniel Bar-Tal, Conflictos Intratables, puede ayudar a superar esta confusión y a comprender de mejor manera el conflicto. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0718-0241 |