Abstract 5745: Proposing the best MET inhibitor to improve anti-PD-1 efficacy in HCC

• Published in: Cancer research (Chicago, Ill.) Vol. 83; no. 7_Supplement; p. 5745
• Main Authors: de Azevedo, Ricardo A., Turner, Broderick, Jayaprakash, Priyamvada, Bhanu, Krithikaa Rajkumar, Srinivasamani, Anupallavi, Morrow, Brittany, Winkler, Michelle, Hedge, Shweta Mahendra, Liu, Arthur, Slay, Ravaen, Curran, Michael A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 04-04-2023
• ISSN: 1538-7445; 1538-7445
• DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2023-5745

Despite recently approved immunotherapy combinations, Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains among the most therapeutically intractable cancers with a 5-year survival rate of only 18%. Underlying chronic liver disease due to hepatitis B/C infection, alcohol abuse, hemochromatosis, or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis promotes HCC development. Current therapeutic strategies include surgery, radiotherapy and multikinase inhibitors alone or with immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB). In particular, the receptor tyrosine kinase MET and its ligand hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) are known drivers of HCC through promotion of tumor growth, survival, tissue invasion, and angiogenesis. Previously, our collaborators showed that the limited clinical benefit of MET kinase inhibition was partially a result of induced upregulation PD-L1 leading to local T cell suppression. We hypothesized that combining MET inhibition with blockade of the PD-1 immune checkpoint would overcome the limitations of each individual approach and act synergistically to promote HCC tumor regression. We first validated that both MET selective (Capmatinib and Tivantinib) and non-selective (Cabozantinib) inhibitors all induced PD-L1 on HCC cell lines in vitro. Next, we compared Capmatinib and Cabozantinib alone and with PD-1 ICB in vivo in the ICB-sensitive Hepa1-6 and HCA-1 models of HCC. In HCA-1, statistically significant benefit of the MET inhibitor and αPD-1 combination was evident in limitation of tumor growth and extension of survival. In each case, the Capmatinib combination trended toward better outcomes with PD-1 blockade. Mechanistically, the Capmatinib and αPD-1 combination decreased tumor Treg cells while promoting increased accumulation of activated, non-exhausted, proliferating CD8 T cells. Central memory CD8 T cell frequencies were increased by the combination during the effector phase, and combination treated animals were better protected against subsequent rechallenge than those cured by αPD-1 alone. In the myeloid compartment, M1 macrophage frequencies were increased while PMN-MDSC both decreased in frequency and in Arginase 1 levels. Finally, we studied a serially-passaged, αPD-1 refractory DEN HCC model. Despite lack of efficacy of either component therapy, the MET inhibitor and αPD-1 combination significantly extended survival and inhibited tumor growth. As in the αPD-1 sensitive setting, Capmatinib appeared to offer the most therapeutic benefit with αPD-1. Ongoing studies are focused on characterizing changes mediated by the combination therapy which confer aPD-1 sensitivity to the otherwise refractory DEN HCC tumor microenvironment. Molecular studies are focused on understanding the superior ICB potentiating capacity of Type I MET inhibitors versus the other classes. Given the clinical availability of numerous MET and PDL-1 inhibitors, we hope to inform near-term optimization of MET and αPD-1 clinical trial design for HCC.
Citation Format: Ricardo A. de Azevedo, Broderick Turner, Priyamvada Jayaprakash, Krithikaa Rajkumar Bhanu, Anupallavi Srinivasamani, Brittany Morrow, Michelle Winkler, Shweta Mahendra Hedge, Arthur Liu, Ravaen Slay, Michael A. Curran. Proposing the best MET inhibitor to improve anti-PD-1 efficacy in HCC. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5745.