Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Effect of Hepatic Steatosis on Major Hepatocellular Carcinoma Features at MRI

Background Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease has become the leading chronic liver disease in the developed world, with a prevalence of 6%-35%. Its pathological spectrum ranges from simple steatosis (non-alcoholic fatty liver) to different degrees of inflammation and liver cell damage [nonalcoholic s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:QJM : An International Journal of Medicine Vol. 116; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors: Botros, Samer Malak, Ahmed, Khaled Sayed, Ismail, Mohamed Zaki, Ali, Waseema Kamal Ibrahim Hassan
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 23-08-2023
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease has become the leading chronic liver disease in the developed world, with a prevalence of 6%-35%. Its pathological spectrum ranges from simple steatosis (non-alcoholic fatty liver) to different degrees of inflammation and liver cell damage [nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NAFLD)]. NAFLD has gained attention in recent years because of its association with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Objective To see how hepatic fat fraction affects LIRADS major hepatocellular carcinoma features on magnetic resonance imaging. Patients and Methods Our study included 60 patients who had had a liver MR scan and exhibited MRI features in keeping with HCC. We categorize the patients into two groups: hepatic steatosis and non- hepatic steatosis groups based on MRI hepatic fat signal fraction. LI-RADS major and ancillary features were evaluated in all HCCs. Between October 2021 and April 2022, a retrospective search was conducted to find all patients with HCC who underwent an MRI of the liver at the radiology department of Ain Shams University's Faculty of medicine. Results In the current study, a higher proportion of HCCs show non- enhancing capsule in patients with hepatic steatosis; 5 HCC (5/30; 16.7%), while in the non-hepatic steatosis group no HCCs 0 (0%) showed non-enhancing capsule. The effect of ancillary features on diagnostic accuracy is still being researched. As regards the impact of the degree of fatty liver on the major and ancillary HCC features, the “enhancing capsule”, “mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity” and “restricted DWI” features are less commonly seen in cases of moderate to severe hepatic steatosis than in those of mild hepatic steatosis. Our study also showed that HCCs tends to be of a smaller size as the hepatic steatosis degree increased. Conclusion The findings of our retreopective study are coincide with a recent retrospective studies demonstrated that “enhancing capsule” feature of HCC was less frequently observed in patients with hepatic steatosis compared to non-hepatic steatosis patients. We compared the MRI features of HCC in patients with hepatic steatosis to those in patients without hepatic steatosis. Our findings imply that existing imaging criteria for the noninvasive characterization of HCC in individuals with hepatic steatosis should be utilised with care.
ISSN:1460-2725
1460-2393
DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcad069.747