Cardioneuroablation for the treatment of carotid sinus syndrome

Abstract Introduction Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS), characterized by exaggerated vagal responses leading to asystolic pauses with carotid sinus massage (CSM), often necessitates pacemaker implantation. This study investigates cardioneuroablation (CNA) as an alternative management strategy for CSS. M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European heart journal Vol. 45; no. Supplement_1
Main Authors: Minguito Carazo, C, Martinez Alday, J D, Rodriguez Manero, M, Martinez Sande, J L, Garcia Seara, J, Gonzalez Ferrero, T, Elices Teja, J, Fernandez Lopez, X A, Garcia Rodeja, F, Gonzalez Juanatey, J R
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 28-10-2024
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Introduction Carotid sinus syndrome (CSS), characterized by exaggerated vagal responses leading to asystolic pauses with carotid sinus massage (CSM), often necessitates pacemaker implantation. This study investigates cardioneuroablation (CNA) as an alternative management strategy for CSS. Methods Prospective study of consecutive patients referred for CNA. All patients underwent CSM, atropine test, 24-hour Holter monitoring and SF-36 quality of life questionary before the procedure and at 6 months. The objective of the study was to assess syncope free survival, grade of cardioinhibition with CSM and heart rate variation (HRV) and quality of life after the procedure. Results A total of 13 patients (84.6% male, mean age 63.8 ± 12.3 years) were included. After a median follow-up of 11.2 (10.6-16.3) months, none of the patients experienced syncope (0%) and none of the patients required pacemaker implantation. After the procedure all the patients had a negative CSM and only one patient (7.7%) had a positive CSM at 6 months (Figure 1). There was an improvement in the energy and health change items in the SF-36 quality of life questionary (Figure 2). There was a reduction in HR increase in the atropine test at 6 months (pre-CNA: 66% (52-84) vs. post-CNA 27.4% (21.9-90.9); p=0.027) and in most of the 24-hour Holter monitoring HRV parameters. Conclusions Cardioneuroablation emerges as a promising and effective alternative to pacemaker implantation in managing cardioinhibitory CSS. Further research is warranted to solidify these findings and explore the long-term effects of CNA in this scenario.Figure 1Figure 2
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.412