Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography predicts 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 45; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Zhang, H, Sau, A, Patlatzoglou, K, Pastika, L, Sieliwonczyk, E, Gurnani, M, Zeidaabadi, B, Macierzanka, K, Barker, J, Liang, Y, Peters, N S, Kramer, D B, Waks, J W, Ng, F S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 28-10-2024
• ISSN: 0195-668X; 1522-9645
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3499

Abstract Background The ACC/AHA pooled cohort equations (PCE) calculates the 10-year primary risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), an indication to initiate primary prevention statin therapy in international guidelines. The validity of PCE is limited by its overestimation of risk in high-risk cohorts and an ethnic heterogeneity. Electrocardiography (ECG) has not been incorporated in current ASCVD risk estimation tools. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based models are capable to capture patterns that are informative for cardiovascular prognosis. Purpose We explored the predictive value of a discrete-time survival model in 10-year ASCVD risk in comparison to PCE. Methods We developed an AI-ECG model to predict the 10-year ASCVD risk in an unselected secondary care population from the USA comprised of 1,163,401 ECGs from 189,539 patients. Data was split into training/validation and hold-out test sets by patient ID. Our AI-ECG model uses deep learning with a residual convolutional neural network with a discrete-time survival loss function to output subject-specific survival curves, accounting for both time to event and censorship (i.e., loss to follow up). We compared the performance of out AI-ECG model using a subset of outpatient data (n=4590) of the BIDMC dataset to PCE and ASCVD risk factors including systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, hypertension, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, and ethnicity. Performances were evaluated using cox survival analysis. Our AI-ECG model was externally validated in the UKB Biobank (UKB), where we compared the performance of our AI-ECG model to predictions of existing AI-ECG models such as the Stanford Estimator of Electrocardiogram Risk (SEER) model. Results Our AI-ECG successfully predicted future ASCVD events in individuals (C-index 0.721 (0.719-0.723), 5-year AUC 0.761 (0.758-0.763), and differentiated between high and low risk group with an adjusted HR of 2.33 (2.26-2.41). Upon internal validation our AI-ECG model showed a superior performance (C-index 0.679 (0.651-0.708)) than PCE (0.605 (0.577-0.634)) and all risk factors combined (C index 0.642 (0.613-0.672)). When combining AI-ECG predictions with all risk factors, the model showed additional predictive value (0.686 (0.657-0.715)) (Figure 1). Our AI-ECG model showed modest predictive value within the UKB dataset (C-index 0.655 (0.637-0.673)), but significantly outperformed the SEER model (C-index 0.547 (0.527-0.567), p <0.0001 for comparison with AIRE). Conclusion We have shown the potential of AI-ECG models in predicting future ASCVD risks. AI-ECG models demonstrated accurate discrete time survival prediction and good classification performance superior to that of the SEER model, as well as PCE and ASCVD risk factors. . Accurate risk assessment of ASCVD may help prevent adverse events in high risk subjects and save unnecessary pharmacological interventios in low risk subjects.Figure 1