Treatment with mTOR Inhibitors as primary immunosuppression after combined heart and kidney transplantation

• Published in: European heart journal Vol. 45; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Alnsasra, H, Asleh, R, Khalil, F, Akiki, E, Briasoulis, A, Dean, P, Bentall, A, Kushwaha, S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 28-10-2024
• ISSN: 0195-668X; 1522-9645
• DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1135

Abstract Background It has been hypothesized that combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKT) may lead to immune modulation and attenuation of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression. Sirolimus (SRL) has been shown to mitigate the progression of CAV and confer renal protection. With the increasing use of SRL as primary immunosuppression in heart transplant (HT) recipients, the effect of HKT on CAV progression compared to HT-only remains undetermined. Purpose We sought to investigate the patterns of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to SRL, and its impact on CAV progression and outcomes in HKT compared to HT-only in a cohort with frequent use of SRL as primary immunosuppression. Methods A cohort of 302 patients who underwent either HT only (n=262) or combined HKT (n=40) was analyzed. CAV progression was assessed by measuring the delta (Δ) annual change in plaque volume (PV) normalized to vessel length (PV/VL in mm3/mm) and plaque index (PI) (%) (calculated as the PV to VV ratio) between baseline and last follow-up coronary intravenous ultrasound (IVUS). Clinical adverse outcomes included all-cause death and CAV-associated events. Secondary outcomes included differences in renal function and incidence of SRL-associated proteinuria (defined as Δ urine protein ≥300 mg/24 h at 1 year after conversion to SRL) between HT-only and HKT recipients. Results Overall, 217 (72%) patients were converted from CNI to SRL as primary immunosuppression. HT recipients were more likely to be converted to SRL than combined HKT recipients (74% vs. 55%, P=0.01). HKT was associated with significantly higher ΔPV/VL (P=0.01) and a trend toward a higher ΔPI (P=0.06) than HT-only, but this association was markedly attenuated after adjustment to SRL conversion. HKT was associated with similar risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95%CI: 0.28-1.71, P=0.43) and CAV-related events (adjusted HR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.30-2.31, P=0.72). Conversion to SRL was significantly associated with decreased risk of death and CAV-related events in the overall cohort. This association was not modified by the type of organ transplantation (Pinteraction=NS), and without a significant effect on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or proteinuria. Conclusions HKT recipients compared to HT-only were less likely to be converted from CNI to SRL-based immunosuppression and had a greater CAV progression but without significant differences in all-cause mortality or CAV-related events. The clinical benefit and safety of conversion to SRL appeared similar in the HKT and isolated HT cohorts.