The effect of birth weight and age at tail docking and ear notching on the behavioral and physiological responses of piglets

• Published in: Journal of animal science Vol. 92; no. 4; pp. 1718 - 1727
• Main Authors: Bovey, K E, Widowski, T M, Dewey, C E, Devillers, N, Farmer, C, Lessard, M, Torrey, S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-04-2014
• Subjects: Aging; Animals; Birth Weight; Ear - surgery; Female; Male; Swine - growth & development; Swine - physiology; Tail - surgery; Vocalization, Animal
• ISSN: 1525-3163
• DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7063

Selection for high prolificacy has resulted in litters comprising a large number of low-birth-weight (LBW) piglets. Given their presence in over 75% of litters and increased mortality rate, it is clear that a greater understanding of LBW piglet management is required for both animal welfare and productivity. In this study, we compared the effects of tail docking and ear notching LBW and average-birth-weight (ABW) piglets at 1 or 3 d of age on suckling, behavior, passive transfer of immunoglobulins, and growth. Six piglets per litter from 20 litters (n = 120 piglets) were used in a 2 × 2 complete block design. Piglets were weighed at birth and designated as LBW (0.6 to 1.0 kg) or ABW (≥ 1.2 kg) and "processed" (tail docked and ear notched) at either 1 or 3 d of age. Vocalizations were recorded during the procedures. The acute behavioral responses were observed for 10 min after the procedure. Piglets were observed for 6 h after birth and after the procedure to determine their presence at nursing bouts. On d 5, blood samples were collected to determine concentrations of serum immunoglobulins (IgA and IgG) and IGF-I. Piglet weights were recorded at birth and on d 5, 14, and 21. During the procedures, LBW piglets produced fewer (P = 0.03) calls than ABW piglets. Piglets from either birth weight category produced a similar number (calls/s; P = 0.29) of high-frequency calls (≥ 1,000 Hz), which are indicative of pain and distress, although the average frequency (Hz) of these calls was greatest (P = 0.05) for ABW piglets processed on d 3. Immediately following the procedures, LBW piglets spent more (P = 0.005) time dog-sitting and less (P = 0.005) time lying than ABW piglets. When observed with the sow, LBW males spent more (P = 0.001) time alone and had the lowest (P = 0.007) attendance at nursing bouts compared with LBW females and all ABW piglets. Concentrations of serum IgA (P = 0.06) and IgG (P = 0.04) and plasma IGF-I (P = 0.003) were lower for LBW than ABW piglets regardless of age of processing although the magnitude of these differences was likely not of biological significance. Average-birth-weight piglets may be less reactive to the acute effects of the procedures on d 1 than on d 3. Given the decreased likelihood of a LBW piglet surviving to weaning (P = 0.001), delaying processing until 3 d of age for LBW piglets may eliminate unnecessary procedures.