Lymph Node Harvest in Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
Background This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Methods An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the numb...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of surgical oncology Vol. 20; no. 9; pp. 3038 - 3043 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Boston
Springer US
01-09-2013
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Background
This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT).
Methods
An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model.
Results
We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7 %, 29.7 months and 30.4 %, and 17.7 months and 25.4 % (
p
= 0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS.
Conclusions
The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT).
An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model.
We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7%, 29.7 months and 30.4%, and 17.7 months and 25.4% (p=0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS.
The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT. BACKGROUNDThis study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT).METHODSAn analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model.RESULTSWe identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7%, 29.7 months and 30.4%, and 17.7 months and 25.4% (p=0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS.CONCLUSIONSThe number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT. This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. >=10, <12 vs. >=12, and <15 vs. >=15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7 %, 29.7 months and 30.4 %, and 17.7 months and 25.4 % (p = 0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS. The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Background This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Methods An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7 %, 29.7 months and 30.4 %, and 17.7 months and 25.4 % ( p = 0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS. Conclusions The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT. |
Author | Hoffe, Sarah E. Chuong, Michael D. Meredith, Kenneth Shridhar, Ravi Weber, Jill M. Almhanna, Khaldoun Karl, Richard C. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ravi surname: Shridhar fullname: Shridhar, Ravi email: ravi.shridhar@moffitt.org organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center – sequence: 2 givenname: Sarah E. surname: Hoffe fullname: Hoffe, Sarah E. organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center – sequence: 3 givenname: Khaldoun surname: Almhanna fullname: Almhanna, Khaldoun organization: Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center – sequence: 4 givenname: Jill M. surname: Weber fullname: Weber, Jill M. organization: Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center – sequence: 5 givenname: Michael D. surname: Chuong fullname: Chuong, Michael D. organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center – sequence: 6 givenname: Richard C. surname: Karl fullname: Karl, Richard C. organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center – sequence: 7 givenname: Kenneth surname: Meredith fullname: Meredith, Kenneth organization: Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23625142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkU1PwzAMhiME4mPwA7igSly4FOLESdMjmvgS07jAOfLajG1am5K0SPv3ZAwkxMW27EfWa78nbL_1rWPsHPg1CFQ3EThKzDnIXJTG5LjHjkGlDmoD-6nm2uSl0OqIncS44hwKydUhOxJSCwUojtnzZNN0i2zqa5c9Uvh0sc-WbXYXfbegd0frbExt5UJ2O-9TnDpP9Wr4pLbPxgvX-ED10vcLF6jbnLKDOa2jO_vJI_Z2f_c6fswnLw9P49tJ3gkj-lxxMSv0HLnQVVGhMSWBlMQN6BIIsUJRcKR5ukSXtdGGI8yUIumco0KBHLGr3d4u-I8hKbbNMlZuvabW-SFaQDCA0nyjl__QlR9Cm9RtqQI5lOWWuvihhlnjatuFZUNhY3_flACxA2Iate8u_FnD7dYLu_PCJi_s1guL8gvXG3iq |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/jso.21850 10.1245/s10434-011-2078-4 10.1002/cncr.25995 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467 10.1002/cncr.23309 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5 10.3322/caac.20121 10.1007/s11605-007-0264-2 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.2235 10.1245/s10434-009-0862-1 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Society of Surgical Oncology 2013 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Society of Surgical Oncology 2013 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7TO 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1534-4681 |
EndPage | 3043 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3035992211 23625142 10_1245_s10434_013_2988_4 |
Genre | Clinical Trial Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 1SB 203 23M 28- 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2WC 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5QI 5VS 67Z 6J9 6NX 78A 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AABYN AAFGU AAHNG AAIAL AAJKR AAKSU AANXM AANZL AAPBV AARHV AARTL AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYFA AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFGW ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKAS ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABOCM ABPLI ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABUWZ ABWNU ABXPI ACBMV ACBRV ACBXY ACBYP ACGFO ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACIGE ACIHN ACIPQ ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPRK ACREN ACTTH ACUDM ACVWB ACWMK ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADMDM ADOXG ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEAQA AEBTG AEEQQ AEFIE AEFTE AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AESTI AETLH AEVLU AEVTX AEXYK AFAFS AFEXP AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFNRJ AFQWF AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGBP AGGDS AGJBK AGKHE AGMZJ AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIIXL AILAN AIMYW AITGF AJBLW AJDOV AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD AKQUC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BAWUL BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DIK DL5 DNIVK DPUIP E3Z EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GX1 GXS HEOXT HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IH2 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH L7B LAS LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD OWW P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UNUBA UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 WOQ YFH YLTOR Z45 Z5O Z7U Z7V Z7W Z7X Z81 Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8V Z91 ZMTXR ZOVNA AACDK AAEOY AAJBT AASML AAYZH ABAKF ACAOD ACDTI ACZOJ AEFQL AEMSY AFBBN AGQEE AGRTI AIGIU AJOOF ALIPV CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF H13 NPM 7TO 7XB 8FK H94 K9. PQEST PQUKI 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-p282t-502b76f4026c7c4889a133a081691a44c42704af15369d868041b55a3eeea7513 |
IEDL.DBID | AEJHL |
ISSN | 1068-9265 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 04:07:45 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 22:05:58 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:47:49 EDT 2024 Sat Dec 16 12:02:57 EST 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | Esophageal Cancer Lymph Node Pathologic Response Overall Survival Intensity Modulate Radiation Therapy |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p282t-502b76f4026c7c4889a133a081691a44c42704af15369d868041b55a3eeea7513 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PMID | 23625142 |
PQID | 1417401991 |
PQPubID | 32486 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1418143851 proquest_journals_1417401991 pubmed_primary_23625142 springer_journals_10_1245_s10434_013_2988_4 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2013 text: 2013-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Boston |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Boston – name: United States – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | Annals of surgical oncology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Ann Surg Oncol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ann Surg Oncol |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | Meredith, Weber, Turaga, Siegel, McLoughlin, Hoffe (CR8) 2010; 17 Stahl, Stuschke, Lehmann, Meyer, Walz, Seeber (CR13) 2005; 23 Govindarajan, Gönen, Weiser, Shia, Temple, Guillem, Paty, Nash (CR11) 2011; 29 Shridhar, Dombi, Finkelstein, Meredith, Hoffe (CR10) 2011; 117 Roh, Colangelo, O’Connell, Yothers, Deutsch, Allegra (CR12) 2009; 27 Greenstein, Litle, Swanson, Divino, Packer, Wisnivesky (CR3) 2008; 112 Peyre, Hagen, DeMeester, Altorki, Ancona, Griffin (CR5) 2008; 248 Hsu, Wang, Chou, Huang, Wu, Hsu (CR4) 2011; 103 Schwarz, Smith (CR7) 2007; 11 Siegel, Ward, Brawley, Jemal (CR1) 2011; 61 Dittrick, Weber, Shridhar, Hoffe, Melis, Almhanna (CR9) 2012; 19 Sjoquist, Burmeister, Smithers, Zalcberg, Simes, Barbour, Gebski (CR2) 2011; 12 Rizk, Ishwaran, Rice, Chen, Schipper, Kesler (CR6) 2010; 251 |
References_xml | – volume: 103 start-page: 416 issue: 5 year: 2011 end-page: 420 ident: CR4 article-title: The total number of resected lymph node is not a prognostic factor for recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergone transthoracic esophagectomy publication-title: J Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1002/jso.21850 contributor: fullname: Hsu – volume: 19 start-page: 1678 issue: 5 year: 2012 end-page: 1684 ident: CR9 article-title: Pathologic nonresponders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer demonstrate no survival benefit compared with patients treated with primary esophagectomy publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2078-4 contributor: fullname: Almhanna – volume: 248 start-page: 549 issue: 4 year: 2008 end-page: 556 ident: CR5 article-title: The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection publication-title: Ann Surg. contributor: fullname: Griffin – volume: 117 start-page: 3908 issue: 17 year: 2011 end-page: 3916 ident: CR10 article-title: Improved survival in patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer who received preoperative radiation: an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database publication-title: Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25995 contributor: fullname: Hoffe – volume: 23 start-page: 2310 issue: 10 year: 2005 end-page: 2317 ident: CR13 article-title: Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus publication-title: J Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034 contributor: fullname: Seeber – volume: 27 start-page: 5124 issue: 31 year: 2009 end-page: 5130 ident: CR12 article-title: Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03 publication-title: J Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467 contributor: fullname: Allegra – volume: 112 start-page: 1239 issue: 6 year: 2008 end-page: 1246 ident: CR3 article-title: Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer publication-title: Cancer. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23309 contributor: fullname: Wisnivesky – volume: 12 start-page: 681 issue: 7 year: 2011 end-page: 692 ident: CR2 article-title: Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis publication-title: Lancet Oncol. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5 contributor: fullname: Gebski – volume: 61 start-page: 212 issue: 4 year: 2011 end-page: 236 ident: CR1 article-title: Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin. doi: 10.3322/caac.20121 contributor: fullname: Jemal – volume: 11 start-page: 1384 issue: 11 year: 2007 end-page: 1393 ident: CR7 article-title: Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0264-2 contributor: fullname: Smith – volume: 29 start-page: 4568 issue: 34 year: 2011 end-page: 4573 ident: CR11 article-title: Challenging the feasibility and clinical significance of current guidelines on lymph node examination in rectal cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy publication-title: J Clin Oncol. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.2235 contributor: fullname: Nash – volume: 17 start-page: 1159 issue: 4 year: 2010 end-page: 1167 ident: CR8 article-title: Pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy is the major determinant of survival in patients with esophageal cancer publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0862-1 contributor: fullname: Hoffe – volume: 251 start-page: 46 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 50 ident: CR6 article-title: Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer publication-title: Ann Surg. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee contributor: fullname: Kesler |
SSID | ssj0017305 |
Score | 2.3432465 |
Snippet | Background
This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation... This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). An... This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). An... BACKGROUNDThis study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 3038 |
SubjectTerms | Adenocarcinoma - mortality Adenocarcinoma - pathology Adenocarcinoma - therapy Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy Chemoradiotherapy - mortality Cisplatin - administration & dosage Combined Modality Therapy Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy Esophagectomy Female Fluorouracil - administration & dosage Follow-Up Studies Humans Lymph Node Excision - mortality Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymph Nodes - surgery Lymphatic Metastasis Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality Neoplasm Staging Oncology Organoplatinum Compounds - administration & dosage Paclitaxel - administration & dosage Prognosis Surgery Surgical Oncology Survival Rate Thoracic Oncology |
Title | Lymph Node Harvest in Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23625142 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1417401991 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1418143851 |
Volume | 20 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NS8MwFH_oBuLF74_pHBG8SaVLk34cx-yYbu6igreSNilMoR3beth_73ttNwR30XPTEN57SX6_vOT9AO6k4ipwbNuSQeJZoqsdC90cW9IYZCOIURNDRHH46k0-_MeQyuTwzdFF9vWwzkiWC3VZAEFIeusmHLowQdJj6F2xC03ceqRoQLMXPg_Hm9wBxqwsc5wuTmXuyjqXubWTbbjyV0603GoGh_8Z5BEc1MCS9apIOIYdk53A3kudOj-F0XiFjmOTXBtGgkA4FjbNWEgyBrim4K99CoA565FqOJuYXOnPAnH2klFRAYwUPa1fa63O4H0QvvWHVq2kYM2QUi0tafPYc1Pkim7iJThnA4XcVJHoRtBVQiSCe7ZQKS5_bqB9l4oSxVIqxxijPNl1zqGR5Zm5BCYQESmp0iBJXeGn0uexTuw4TYX0dZr4LWivLRrV02GB_KJLyn-IRVtwu_mMgUzZCZWZvCjb-KTFLrHNReWJaFZV3Ig4brOI7HgL7td2_9E50hg0flQZP0LjR2T8SFz9qfU17PNS6oLuj7WhsZwX5gZ2F7ro1BHWQcj9NPoGz93JUg |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,27934,27935,41074,42143,48345,48348,48358,49650,49653,49663,52154 |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JTsMwEB3RVgIu7EuhgJG4oUhZ7CzHqrS06nKhSNwiJ3akckiqtjn075nJUiHBBc5xLGtmbL_R88wDeBLSloFjmoYIYs_glnIMdHNkCK0xG0GMGmtKFIdv3uzDf-lTmxynroUpXrvXlGRxUhcdELigYjfu0IsJ0h5D9_IGtKjZudmEVnc0fx3syAMMWlGQnC7uZdsVFZn56yS_AcsfpGhx1wyO_7XKEziqoCXrlrFwCns6PYP9aUWen8N4skXXsVmmNCNJIFwMW6SsT0IGeKrgrz0KgRXrkm44m-lMqs8ckfaGUVsBjBW1qOq1thfwPujPe0Oj0lIwlphUbQxh2pHnJpgturEX464NJGankmQ3AktyHnPbM7lM8AB0A-W71JYoEkI6WmvpCcu5hGaapfoaGEdMJIVMgjhxuZ8I345UbEZJwoWvkthvQ6c2aVhtiDVmGBZp_yEabcPj7jOGMvETMtVZXozxSY1d4Jir0hXhsuy5Edp40SK2s9vwXNv92-SYyKDxw9L4IRo_JOOH_OZPox_gYDifTsLJaDa-hUO7EL6g12QdaG5Wub6Dxlrl91W4fQEmP8xA |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFH7YFooX96VadQRvEswyk-UkpQvV1iKo4C1MMjNQD2npcui_970kLYK9iOdMhuEtM-_jLR_AnZCujDzbtkSUBhZ3lGehmhNLaI1oBGPUVBNQ7L8Fo8-w06UxOY_rXpi82n2dkix6GmhKU7Z4mCpTTEPgghrfuEfVE8RDhqrmFahxKi2sQq3Vfe4PN4kENGCRJzx99GvXF2Vic-sm24LMXwnS_N3p7f_7xAewV4acrFXYyCHs6OwI6i9lUv0YBsMVqpSNJkozogrCg7FxxrpEcIC3Df7aJtOYsRbxibORnkj1tcQIfMFo3ADakBqXfVyrE_jodd_bfavkWLCmCLYWlrDdJPANokg_DVL05kgiapVExxE5kvOUu4HNpcGL0Y9U6NO4okQI6WmtZSAc7xSq2STT58A4xkpSSBOlxuehEaGbqNROjOEiVCYNG9BcizcuHWWOyMMhTkCMUhtwu_mMJk55C5npyTJfExJLu8A1Z4Va4mkxiyN28QHGmM9twP1aBz82R4CDwo8L4cco_JiEH_OLP62-gfprpxcPn0aDS9h1cz4MKjJrQnUxW-orqMzV8rq0vG9pbNUM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lymph+Node+Harvest+in+Esophageal+Cancer+After+Neoadjuvant+Chemoradiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Shridhar%2C+Ravi&rft.au=Hoffe%2C+Sarah+E.&rft.au=Almhanna%2C+Khaldoun&rft.au=Weber%2C+Jill+M.&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.pub=Springer+US&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3038&rft.epage=3043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245%2Fs10434-013-2988-4&rft.externalDocID=10_1245_s10434_013_2988_4 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon |