Lymph Node Harvest in Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

Background This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Methods An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the numb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of surgical oncology Vol. 20; no. 9; pp. 3038 - 3043
Main Authors: Shridhar, Ravi, Hoffe, Sarah E., Almhanna, Khaldoun, Weber, Jill M., Chuong, Michael D., Karl, Richard C., Meredith, Kenneth
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Boston Springer US 01-09-2013
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Background This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Methods An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7 %, 29.7 months and 30.4 %, and 17.7 months and 25.4 % ( p  = 0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS. Conclusions The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT.
AbstractList This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7%, 29.7 months and 30.4%, and 17.7 months and 25.4% (p=0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS. The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT.
BACKGROUNDThis study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT).METHODSAn analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model.RESULTSWe identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7%, 29.7 months and 30.4%, and 17.7 months and 25.4% (p=0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS.CONCLUSIONSThe number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT.
This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. >=10, <12 vs. >=12, and <15 vs. >=15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7 %, 29.7 months and 30.4 %, and 17.7 months and 25.4 % (p = 0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS. The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Background This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Methods An analysis of surgically resected esophageal cancer patients after nCRT was performed to determine an association between the number of LNs resected and survival. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) curves were calculated according to the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank analysis. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed by the Cox proportional hazard model. Results We identified 358 patients with a mean follow-up of 27.3 months. The number of LN removed was not impacted by the type of surgical procedure. The number of LNs removed (<10 vs. ≥10, <12 vs. ≥12, and <15 vs. ≥15) did not impact OS or DFS. We found a significant difference in OS and DFS by pathologic response. The median and 5-year OS for patients with complete, partial, and no response was 65.6 months and 52.7 %, 29.7 months and 30.4 %, and 17.7 months and 25.4 % ( p  = 0.0002). However, the number of LN harvested did not impact OS and DFS when patients were stratified by pathologic response. MVA also revealed that the number of lymph nodes removed was not prognostic for OS or DFS. Higher age, higher stage, and less than a complete response were associated with a decreased OS. Higher stage and less than a complete response were prognostic for worse DFS. Conclusions The number of LNs harvested during esophagectomy does not impact survival after nCRT. Stage and pathologic response continue to be the strongest prognostic factors for survival in esophageal cancer after nCRT.
Author Hoffe, Sarah E.
Chuong, Michael D.
Meredith, Kenneth
Shridhar, Ravi
Weber, Jill M.
Almhanna, Khaldoun
Karl, Richard C.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ravi
  surname: Shridhar
  fullname: Shridhar, Ravi
  email: ravi.shridhar@moffitt.org
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sarah E.
  surname: Hoffe
  fullname: Hoffe, Sarah E.
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Khaldoun
  surname: Almhanna
  fullname: Almhanna, Khaldoun
  organization: Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jill M.
  surname: Weber
  fullname: Weber, Jill M.
  organization: Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Michael D.
  surname: Chuong
  fullname: Chuong, Michael D.
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Richard C.
  surname: Karl
  fullname: Karl, Richard C.
  organization: Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Kenneth
  surname: Meredith
  fullname: Meredith, Kenneth
  organization: Gastrointestinal Tumor Program, Moffitt Cancer Center
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23625142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkU1PwzAMhiME4mPwA7igSly4FOLESdMjmvgS07jAOfLajG1am5K0SPv3ZAwkxMW27EfWa78nbL_1rWPsHPg1CFQ3EThKzDnIXJTG5LjHjkGlDmoD-6nm2uSl0OqIncS44hwKydUhOxJSCwUojtnzZNN0i2zqa5c9Uvh0sc-WbXYXfbegd0frbExt5UJ2O-9TnDpP9Wr4pLbPxgvX-ED10vcLF6jbnLKDOa2jO_vJI_Z2f_c6fswnLw9P49tJ3gkj-lxxMSv0HLnQVVGhMSWBlMQN6BIIsUJRcKR5ukSXtdGGI8yUIumco0KBHLGr3d4u-I8hKbbNMlZuvabW-SFaQDCA0nyjl__QlR9Cm9RtqQI5lOWWuvihhlnjatuFZUNhY3_flACxA2Iate8u_FnD7dYLu_PCJi_s1guL8gvXG3iq
Cites_doi 10.1002/jso.21850
10.1245/s10434-011-2078-4
10.1002/cncr.25995
10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034
10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467
10.1002/cncr.23309
10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5
10.3322/caac.20121
10.1007/s11605-007-0264-2
10.1200/JCO.2011.37.2235
10.1245/s10434-009-0862-1
10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Society of Surgical Oncology 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: Society of Surgical Oncology 2013
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7TO
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Health & Medical Complete (ProQuest Database)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1534-4681
EndPage 3043
ExternalDocumentID 3035992211
23625142
10_1245_s10434_013_2988_4
Genre Clinical Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
1SB
203
23M
28-
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2WC
2~H
30V
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6J9
6NX
78A
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AABYN
AAFGU
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJKR
AAKSU
AANXM
AANZL
AAPBV
AARHV
AARTL
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYFA
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFGW
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKAS
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABOCM
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBXY
ACBYP
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIGE
ACIHN
ACIPQ
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPRK
ACREN
ACTTH
ACUDM
ACVWB
ACWMK
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADMDM
ADOXG
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEAQA
AEBTG
AEEQQ
AEFIE
AEFTE
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AESTI
AETLH
AEVLU
AEVTX
AEXYK
AFAFS
AFEXP
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFNRJ
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGBP
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGKHE
AGMZJ
AGQMX
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIIXL
AILAN
AIMYW
AITGF
AJBLW
AJDOV
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
AKQUC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BAWUL
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C1A
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DIK
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GX1
GXS
HEOXT
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IH2
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
L7B
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
OWW
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UNUBA
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOQ
YFH
YLTOR
Z45
Z5O
Z7U
Z7V
Z7W
Z7X
Z81
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8V
Z91
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
AACDK
AAEOY
AAJBT
AASML
AAYZH
ABAKF
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACZOJ
AEFQL
AEMSY
AFBBN
AGQEE
AGRTI
AIGIU
AJOOF
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
H13
NPM
7TO
7XB
8FK
H94
K9.
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-p282t-502b76f4026c7c4889a133a081691a44c42704af15369d868041b55a3eeea7513
IEDL.DBID AEJHL
ISSN 1068-9265
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 04:07:45 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:05:58 EDT 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:47:49 EDT 2024
Sat Dec 16 12:02:57 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords Esophageal Cancer
Lymph Node
Pathologic Response
Overall Survival
Intensity Modulate Radiation Therapy
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-p282t-502b76f4026c7c4889a133a081691a44c42704af15369d868041b55a3eeea7513
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 23625142
PQID 1417401991
PQPubID 32486
PageCount 6
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1418143851
proquest_journals_1417401991
pubmed_primary_23625142
springer_journals_10_1245_s10434_013_2988_4
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Boston
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Boston
– name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Annals of surgical oncology
PublicationTitleAbbrev Ann Surg Oncol
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Surg Oncol
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Meredith, Weber, Turaga, Siegel, McLoughlin, Hoffe (CR8) 2010; 17
Stahl, Stuschke, Lehmann, Meyer, Walz, Seeber (CR13) 2005; 23
Govindarajan, Gönen, Weiser, Shia, Temple, Guillem, Paty, Nash (CR11) 2011; 29
Shridhar, Dombi, Finkelstein, Meredith, Hoffe (CR10) 2011; 117
Roh, Colangelo, O’Connell, Yothers, Deutsch, Allegra (CR12) 2009; 27
Greenstein, Litle, Swanson, Divino, Packer, Wisnivesky (CR3) 2008; 112
Peyre, Hagen, DeMeester, Altorki, Ancona, Griffin (CR5) 2008; 248
Hsu, Wang, Chou, Huang, Wu, Hsu (CR4) 2011; 103
Schwarz, Smith (CR7) 2007; 11
Siegel, Ward, Brawley, Jemal (CR1) 2011; 61
Dittrick, Weber, Shridhar, Hoffe, Melis, Almhanna (CR9) 2012; 19
Sjoquist, Burmeister, Smithers, Zalcberg, Simes, Barbour, Gebski (CR2) 2011; 12
Rizk, Ishwaran, Rice, Chen, Schipper, Kesler (CR6) 2010; 251
References_xml – volume: 103
  start-page: 416
  issue: 5
  year: 2011
  end-page: 420
  ident: CR4
  article-title: The total number of resected lymph node is not a prognostic factor for recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergone transthoracic esophagectomy
  publication-title: J Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1002/jso.21850
  contributor:
    fullname: Hsu
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1678
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1684
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Pathologic nonresponders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer demonstrate no survival benefit compared with patients treated with primary esophagectomy
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2078-4
  contributor:
    fullname: Almhanna
– volume: 248
  start-page: 549
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  end-page: 556
  ident: CR5
  article-title: The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  contributor:
    fullname: Griffin
– volume: 117
  start-page: 3908
  issue: 17
  year: 2011
  end-page: 3916
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Improved survival in patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer who received preoperative radiation: an analysis of the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.25995
  contributor:
    fullname: Hoffe
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2310
  issue: 10
  year: 2005
  end-page: 2317
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Chemoradiation with and without surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.00.034
  contributor:
    fullname: Seeber
– volume: 27
  start-page: 5124
  issue: 31
  year: 2009
  end-page: 5130
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0467
  contributor:
    fullname: Allegra
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1239
  issue: 6
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1246
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer
  publication-title: Cancer.
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.23309
  contributor:
    fullname: Wisnivesky
– volume: 12
  start-page: 681
  issue: 7
  year: 2011
  end-page: 692
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable oesophageal carcinoma: an updated meta-analysis
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol.
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70142-5
  contributor:
    fullname: Gebski
– volume: 61
  start-page: 212
  issue: 4
  year: 2011
  end-page: 236
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin.
  doi: 10.3322/caac.20121
  contributor:
    fullname: Jemal
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1384
  issue: 11
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1393
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
  doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0264-2
  contributor:
    fullname: Smith
– volume: 29
  start-page: 4568
  issue: 34
  year: 2011
  end-page: 4573
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Challenging the feasibility and clinical significance of current guidelines on lymph node examination in rectal cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol.
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.2235
  contributor:
    fullname: Nash
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1159
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1167
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy is the major determinant of survival in patients with esophageal cancer
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol.
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0862-1
  contributor:
    fullname: Hoffe
– volume: 251
  start-page: 46
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 50
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer
  publication-title: Ann Surg.
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b2f6ee
  contributor:
    fullname: Kesler
SSID ssj0017305
Score 2.3432465
Snippet Background This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation...
This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). An...
This study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). An...
BACKGROUNDThis study was designed to determine the effects of lymph node (LN) harvest on survival in esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 3038
SubjectTerms Adenocarcinoma - mortality
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - therapy
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy
Chemoradiotherapy - mortality
Cisplatin - administration & dosage
Combined Modality Therapy
Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - therapy
Esophagectomy
Female
Fluorouracil - administration & dosage
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymph Node Excision - mortality
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymph Nodes - surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality
Neoplasm Staging
Oncology
Organoplatinum Compounds - administration & dosage
Paclitaxel - administration & dosage
Prognosis
Surgery
Surgical Oncology
Survival Rate
Thoracic Oncology
Title Lymph Node Harvest in Esophageal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-013-2988-4
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23625142
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1417401991
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1418143851
Volume 20
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NS8MwFH_oBuLF74_pHBG8SaVLk34cx-yYbu6igreSNilMoR3beth_73ttNwR30XPTEN57SX6_vOT9AO6k4ipwbNuSQeJZoqsdC90cW9IYZCOIURNDRHH46k0-_MeQyuTwzdFF9vWwzkiWC3VZAEFIeusmHLowQdJj6F2xC03ceqRoQLMXPg_Hm9wBxqwsc5wuTmXuyjqXubWTbbjyV0603GoGh_8Z5BEc1MCS9apIOIYdk53A3kudOj-F0XiFjmOTXBtGgkA4FjbNWEgyBrim4K99CoA565FqOJuYXOnPAnH2klFRAYwUPa1fa63O4H0QvvWHVq2kYM2QUi0tafPYc1Pkim7iJThnA4XcVJHoRtBVQiSCe7ZQKS5_bqB9l4oSxVIqxxijPNl1zqGR5Zm5BCYQESmp0iBJXeGn0uexTuw4TYX0dZr4LWivLRrV02GB_KJLyn-IRVtwu_mMgUzZCZWZvCjb-KTFLrHNReWJaFZV3Ig4brOI7HgL7td2_9E50hg0flQZP0LjR2T8SFz9qfU17PNS6oLuj7WhsZwX5gZ2F7ro1BHWQcj9NPoGz93JUg
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27934,27935,41074,42143,48345,48348,48358,49650,49653,49663,52154
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JTsMwEB3RVgIu7EuhgJG4oUhZ7CzHqrS06nKhSNwiJ3akckiqtjn075nJUiHBBc5xLGtmbL_R88wDeBLSloFjmoYIYs_glnIMdHNkCK0xG0GMGmtKFIdv3uzDf-lTmxynroUpXrvXlGRxUhcdELigYjfu0IsJ0h5D9_IGtKjZudmEVnc0fx3syAMMWlGQnC7uZdsVFZn56yS_AcsfpGhx1wyO_7XKEziqoCXrlrFwCns6PYP9aUWen8N4skXXsVmmNCNJIFwMW6SsT0IGeKrgrz0KgRXrkm44m-lMqs8ckfaGUVsBjBW1qOq1thfwPujPe0Oj0lIwlphUbQxh2pHnJpgturEX464NJGankmQ3AktyHnPbM7lM8AB0A-W71JYoEkI6WmvpCcu5hGaapfoaGEdMJIVMgjhxuZ8I345UbEZJwoWvkthvQ6c2aVhtiDVmGBZp_yEabcPj7jOGMvETMtVZXozxSY1d4Jir0hXhsuy5Edp40SK2s9vwXNv92-SYyKDxw9L4IRo_JOOH_OZPox_gYDifTsLJaDa-hUO7EL6g12QdaG5Wub6Dxlrl91W4fQEmP8xA
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1JS8NAFH7YFooX96VadQRvEswyk-UkpQvV1iKo4C1MMjNQD2npcui_970kLYK9iOdMhuEtM-_jLR_AnZCujDzbtkSUBhZ3lGehmhNLaI1oBGPUVBNQ7L8Fo8-w06UxOY_rXpi82n2dkix6GmhKU7Z4mCpTTEPgghrfuEfVE8RDhqrmFahxKi2sQq3Vfe4PN4kENGCRJzx99GvXF2Vic-sm24LMXwnS_N3p7f_7xAewV4acrFXYyCHs6OwI6i9lUv0YBsMVqpSNJkozogrCg7FxxrpEcIC3Df7aJtOYsRbxibORnkj1tcQIfMFo3ADakBqXfVyrE_jodd_bfavkWLCmCLYWlrDdJPANokg_DVL05kgiapVExxE5kvOUu4HNpcGL0Y9U6NO4okQI6WmtZSAc7xSq2STT58A4xkpSSBOlxuehEaGbqNROjOEiVCYNG9BcizcuHWWOyMMhTkCMUhtwu_mMJk55C5npyTJfExJLu8A1Z4Va4mkxiyN28QHGmM9twP1aBz82R4CDwo8L4cco_JiEH_OLP62-gfprpxcPn0aDS9h1cz4MKjJrQnUxW-orqMzV8rq0vG9pbNUM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lymph+Node+Harvest+in+Esophageal+Cancer+After+Neoadjuvant+Chemoradiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+surgical+oncology&rft.au=Shridhar%2C+Ravi&rft.au=Hoffe%2C+Sarah+E.&rft.au=Almhanna%2C+Khaldoun&rft.au=Weber%2C+Jill+M.&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.pub=Springer+US&rft.issn=1068-9265&rft.eissn=1534-4681&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3038&rft.epage=3043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1245%2Fs10434-013-2988-4&rft.externalDocID=10_1245_s10434_013_2988_4
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1068-9265&client=summon