Life Expectancy Expert Reports: Common Mistakes and Appropriate Process

Life expectancy expertise must comply with court-mandated evidentiary standards. A proper opinion should abide by 3 principles; it should be generated by a qualified expert who applies proper methods to appropriate facts. Several common mistakes can make opinions unsuitable for admission into testim...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 611 - 619
Main Author: Vachon, Pierre J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01-08-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Life expectancy expertise must comply with court-mandated evidentiary standards. A proper opinion should abide by 3 principles; it should be generated by a qualified expert who applies proper methods to appropriate facts. Several common mistakes can make opinions unsuitable for admission into testimony by straying from 1 or more of these 3 principles. Examining life expectancy opinions in light of these principles allows consumers of life expectancy expertise to evaluate the quality of the opinions proffered.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1558-1381
DOI:10.1016/j.pmr.2019.03.008