Influence of amifostine on the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer patients: A pilot study

• Published in: Clinical cancer research Vol. 8; no. 1; pp. 95 - 102
• Main Authors: FREYER, Gilles, HENNEBERT, Philippe, AWADA, Ahmad, GIL, Thierry, KERGER, Joseph, SELLESLAGS, Jean, BRASSINNE, Christiane, PICCART, Martine, DE VALERIOLA, Dominique
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Philadelphia, PA American Association for Cancer Research 2002
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Amifostine - therapeutic use; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - adverse effects; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic - pharmacokinetics; Biological and medical sciences; Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment; Female; Humans; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Neutrophils - metabolism; Paclitaxel - adverse effects; Paclitaxel - analogs & derivatives; Paclitaxel - pharmacokinetics; Pharmacology. Drug treatments; Pilot Projects; Survival Rate; Taxoids; Toxicity: blood; Vomiting - chemically induced; Antineoplastic agent; Human; Drug combination; Intravenous administration; Toxicity; Treatment efficiency; Docetaxel; Immune reconstitution; Malignant tumor; Amifostine; Prevention; Mammary gland diseases; Chemotherapy; Treatment; Taxane derivatives; Clinical trial; Female; Myelosuppression; Advanced stage; Drug interaction; Metastatic; Mammary gland; Pharmacokinetics; Treatment planning
• ISSN: 1078-0432; 1557-3265

Preclinical studies suggest that amifostine could protect against toxicities induced by taxoids. We conducted a clinical and pharmacokinetic pilot study to assess the feasibility and toxicity of the docetaxel plus amifostine combination and the absence of influence of amifostine on docetaxel pharmacokinetics. We included 18 previously treated women with metastatic breast cancer (median age, 58.5 years; range, 34-74) in this single-center study. They were to receive a first course of docetaxel at 100 mg/m(2) i.v. as a 1-h infusion, then subsequent courses of docetaxel at 100 mg/m(2) preceded by amifostine at 910 mg/m(2) given as a 15-min i.v. infusion. Treatment was given every 3 weeks until disease progression or occurrence of unacceptable toxicity. We focused on neutrophils nadir (NN), time to nadir occurrence, and time to recovery of a neutrophil count >2 x 10(9)/liter, means of which were compared between cycle 1 and each of the other cycles by paired Student's t test. The total number of administered cycles was 84 (median number/patient, 4; range, 1-8). One patient received only the first course of docetaxel and was therefore not evaluable for amifostine effect. Neutropenia grade >2 occurred in 16 patients and was febrile in only 1. Other hematological and nonhematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Amifostine had no obvious influence on docetaxel-induced myelotoxicity as expressed by NN, time to nadir occurrence, and time to recovery. The mean NN (1 x 10(6)/liter) was 345 (18 patients) for cycle 1, then 318 (17 patients), 330 (13 patients), 340 (11 patients), 470 (8 patients), 200 (8 patients), 680 (5 patients), and 545 (4 patients) for cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, respectively (P >0.2). Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of docetaxel estimated in 11 patients undergoing blood sampling showed no influence of amifostine on the PK profile of docetaxel. Mean clearances (liter/h/m(2)) and peak concentration (C(peak); ng/ml) were 29.9 at cycle 1 versus 32.8 at cycle 2 (not significant) and 2849.9 at cycle 1 versus 2542.5 at cycle 2 (not significant), respectively. The population analysis including those 11 patients and 49 additional patients receiving docetaxel in other studies confirmed those findings. This study does not support evidence for amifostine cytoprotection against docetaxel-induced myelosuppression and shows that there is no major influence of amifostine on docetaxel PK parameters. For the other toxicities, which are usually cumulative, the present study has design limitations and further comparative trials are warranted.