Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects

Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are an important tool to detect objectively frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Pure-tone audiometry is the gold-standard for hearing evaluation, although sometimes it may be inconclusive, especially in children and uncooperative adults. Compare pure tone th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology Vol. 80; no. 1; pp. 35 - 40
Main Authors: Beck, Roberto Miquelino de Oliveira, Ramos, Bernardo Faria, Grasel, Signe Schuster, Ramos, Henrique Faria, Moraes, Maria Flávia Bonadia B de, Almeida, Edigar Rezende de, Bento, Ricardo Ferreira
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Brazil Elsevier 01-01-2014
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) are an important tool to detect objectively frequency-specific hearing thresholds. Pure-tone audiometry is the gold-standard for hearing evaluation, although sometimes it may be inconclusive, especially in children and uncooperative adults. Compare pure tone thresholds (PT) with ASSR thresholds in normal hearing subjects. In this prospective cross-sectional study we included 26 adults (n = 52 ears) of both genders, without any hearing complaints or otologic diseases and normal puretone thresholds. All subjects had clinical history, otomicroscopy, audiometry and immitance measurements. This evaluation was followed by the ASSR test. The mean pure-tone and ASSR thresholds for each frequency were calculated. The mean difference between PTand ASSR thresholdswas 7,12 for 500 Hz, 7,6 for 1000 Hz, 8,27 for 2000 Hz and 9,71 dB for 4000 Hz. There were no difference between PT and ASSR means at either frequency. ASSR thresholds were comparable to pure-tone thresholds in normal hearing adults. Nevertheless it should not be used as the only method of hearing evaluation.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1808-8694
1808-8686
DOI:10.5935/1808-8694.20140009