Measuring general practice-based primary care: generic outcomes

Many methods proposed are measures based on readily collectable data or standardized population measures of health status. These are unlikely to satisfy most primary-care clinicians since they do not reflect the complex and personal nature of primary care. Quality measures are needed that have valid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Family practice Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 486 - 491
Main Authors: Stott, N, Kinnersley, P, Elwyn, G J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 01-12-1997
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many methods proposed are measures based on readily collectable data or standardized population measures of health status. These are unlikely to satisfy most primary-care clinicians since they do not reflect the complex and personal nature of primary care. Quality measures are needed that have validity to clinicians and patients. An alternative classification is proposed which is based more formally on the functions of primary care. This would appear to provide a framework which is more likely to be valued by those who provide primary care. Notes the need for further research and testing. (Original abstract - amended)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0263-2136
DOI:10.1093/fampra/14.6.486