Measuring general practice-based primary care: generic outcomes
Many methods proposed are measures based on readily collectable data or standardized population measures of health status. These are unlikely to satisfy most primary-care clinicians since they do not reflect the complex and personal nature of primary care. Quality measures are needed that have valid...
Saved in:
Published in: | Family practice Vol. 14; no. 6; pp. 486 - 491 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
01-12-1997
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Many methods proposed are measures based on readily collectable data or standardized population measures of health status. These are unlikely to satisfy most primary-care clinicians since they do not reflect the complex and personal nature of primary care. Quality measures are needed that have validity to clinicians and patients. An alternative classification is proposed which is based more formally on the functions of primary care. This would appear to provide a framework which is more likely to be valued by those who provide primary care. Notes the need for further research and testing. (Original abstract - amended) |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0263-2136 |
DOI: | 10.1093/fampra/14.6.486 |