Favorable cardiac and aortic remodeling in olmesartan-treated spontaneously hypertensive rats

• Published in: Heart and vessels Vol. 24; no. 3; pp. 219 - 227
• Main Authors: Fernandes-Santos, Caroline, de Souza Mendonça, Leonardo, Mandarim-de-Lacerda, Carlos Alberto
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan Springer Japan 01-05-2009; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Animals; Antihypertensive Agents - pharmacology; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering; Blood Pressure - drug effects; Cardiac Surgery; Cardiology; Cardiovascular disease; Coronary vessels; Drug therapy; Hydralazine - pharmacology; Hypertension; Hypertension - drug therapy; Imidazoles - pharmacology; Inhibitor drugs; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Myocytes, Cardiac - drug effects; Original Article; Rats; Rodents; Tetrazoles - pharmacology; Vascular Surgery; Ventricular Remodeling - drug effects; Arterial hypertension; Angiotensin II; Renin-angiotensin system; Arterial wall stress; AT1 receptor
• ISSN: 0910-8327; 1615-2573
• DOI: 10.1007/s00380-008-1104-3

Cardiovascular remodeling contributes to the progression of cardiovascular disease. Thus, our aim was to evaluate the action of long-term treatment with olmesartan on cardiac and aortic adverse remodeling and its relationship with blood pressure (BP) and tensile forces acting on the aortic wall. Five-month-old male rats were divided in: WKY group (
n
= 6), SHR group (
n
= 6), and SHRs treated with hydralazine 30 mg/kg/day (SHR-H,
n
= 8) or olmesartan 10 mg/kg/day (SHR-O,
n
= 8). Medications were administered for 16 weeks. The SHR group showed hypertension (189 ± 4 mmHg), cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (+107%), interstitial fibrosis (5.7% vs 1.9% in WKY), and reduced intramyocardial vascularization (9.1% vs 22.8% in WKY). In aorta, the SHRs showed outward hypertrophic remodeling, increased elastic fibers content (+36%), and increased circumferential wall tension (CWT, 2.79 × 10
4
dyne/cm) and tensile stress (TS, 261.4 × 10
4
dyne/cm
2
). Hydralazine and olmesartan decreased BP (−45% approximately) and likewise CWT and TS (−45% and −35% approximately). Both medications prevented left ventricle remodeling, but olmesartan improved cardiomyocyte hypertrophy better than hydralazine. Hydralazine did not alter media hypertrophy, but it enlarged lumen diameter and increased elastic fibers. It is unlikely that olmesartan prevented all aortic alterations. Taken together, long-term control of BP alone is not sufficient to prevent aortic remodeling due to hypertension, but in myocardium it seems to be enough, except for cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. The differential action of olmesartan suggests that it is essential to block growth stimulation by angiotensin II in cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells in order to better prevent cardiovascular adverse remodeling due to arterial hypertension.