Relation of symptoms to accommodative infacility of school-aged children

Conventional optometric wisdom holds that accommodative infacility may result in asthenopic symptoms, yet the literature contains little support for this belief. We determined whether failure to achieve 8 cycles per minute of binocular accommodative facility or 11 cycles per minute of monocular acco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of optometry and physiological optics Vol. 61; no. 3; pp. 177 - 183
Main Authors: HENNESSEY, D, IOSUE, R. A, ROUSE, M. W
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Baltimore, MD Williams & Wilkins 01-03-1984
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Conventional optometric wisdom holds that accommodative infacility may result in asthenopic symptoms, yet the literature contains little support for this belief. We determined whether failure to achieve 8 cycles per minute of binocular accommodative facility or 11 cycles per minute of monocular accommodative facility tends to be associated with symptoms. Sixty subjects were given questionnaires to determine whether they were symptomatic. Monocular and binocular accommodative rock using plus and minus 2 D lenses was performed. Statistical analysis indicates that symptomatic subjects performed significantly poorer than asymptomatic subjects on both monocular and binocular facility tests. Patients presenting with asthenopic symptoms should therefore be tested for accommodative infacility.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0093-7002
2330-9512