Comparison of stability of plate fixateurs with parallel and oblique screw directions

One of the main failure mechanisms of modern plate fixateurs is the tearing of the whole plate-screw construct out of the osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to show whether an oblique screw placement can improve the fixation of the plate to the bone. A steel probe was fixed to a synthetic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie Vol. 153; no. 2; p. 160
Main Authors: Ackermann, O, Mauk, P J, Beuke, T, Roslawski, L, Lahner, M, Eckert, K, von Schulze Pellengahr, C
Format: Journal Article
Language:German
Published: Germany 01-04-2015
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:One of the main failure mechanisms of modern plate fixateurs is the tearing of the whole plate-screw construct out of the osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to show whether an oblique screw placement can improve the fixation of the plate to the bone. A steel probe was fixed to a synthetic bone (Fa. Sawbones) with standard titanium fixed-angle screws in parallel and 55° oblique positioning. We tested the static tear force and the dynamic stability (force distance 1.4 or 1.6 mm, 610 and 900 N, frequency of force shift of 560 or 380/min). Endpoint was a visible tear of the artificial bone. In addition we performed a morphological analysis of the torn fragments. The maximal tear force was 2.04 kN (1.95-2.13) for oblique and 2.66 kN (2.55-2.77) for parallel placement (p < 0.05). With a parallel positioning a higher number of force shifts were performed before a visual tear appeared. With parallel positioning the screw canal was torn with an intact surrounding corticalis; in oblique positioning the threads remained intact, the corticalis was torn out with a wedge. An oblique screw positioning does not result in a higher tear force in modern plate fixateurs.
ISSN:1864-6743
DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1396187