Information for patients about hospital infections in psychiatry: An assessment of healthcare professionals' knowledge, opinion and attitude

• Published in: Encéphale Vol. 36; no. 2; p. 132
• Main Authors: Audureau, E, Merle, V, Kerleau, K, Dollois, B, Baugé-Rousseau, M, Théry, S, Tavolacci, M-P, Dubreuil, N, Thillard, D, Gasparin-Grisel, S, Mathieu, M, Augé, C, Czernichow, P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: French
• Published: France 01-04-2010
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude of Health Personnel; Communication; Cross Infection - psychology; Cross Infection - transmission; Female; France; Guideline Adherence - legislation & jurisprudence; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Hospitals, Psychiatric - legislation & jurisprudence; Humans; Informed Consent - legislation & jurisprudence; Informed Consent - psychology; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Admission - legislation & jurisprudence; Patient Care Team - legislation & jurisprudence; Patient Education as Topic - legislation & jurisprudence; Risk; Surveys and Questionnaires; France
• ISSN: 0013-7006
• DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.06.003

French legislation makes mandatory for healthcare providers the disclosure of hospital infection (HI) risk and actual occurrence to the patient. Given the specific diseases encountered in psychiatry, some difficulties may be expected in practical application of this regulation.
The aim of our study was to describe the knowledge, declared practices and opinions of healthcare workers (HCW) in psychiatry concerning information for patients about HI.
We randomly selected doctors, nurses and head nurses from four hospitals with psychiatric activity in Normandy. The HCW were asked to self-complete an anonymous questionnaire, including data describing the responding HCW and questions aiming at describing his/her knowledge, attitude in routine daily practice and opinion about information to patients about HI.
One hundred and forty-one HCW were initially selected, of which 114 (80.9%) eventually agreed to complete the questionnaire. Only eight HCW (7.0%) were considered to have a correct overall knowledge of legal obligations. Main errors concerned the obligation to inform the patient of the HI risk according to the medical procedures that are to be performed (43.9% of correct answers) and the obligation to inform the patient of the HI risk according to his/her medical condition (46.5%). The obligation to inform the patient of the occurrence of a HI was largely known (84.2%). HCW usually giving information about the risk of HI to patients without HI accounted for 5.3%. Main reasons advocated for not informing patients were a low level risk of HI in psychiatry (80.4%) and the lack of patients' demand (59.8%). In the case of HI occurrence, the percentage of HCW routinely informing patients was 13.2%. HCW systematically informing the patient's family about the occurrence of HI accounted for 9.6%. A large proportion of HCW supported delivering information to patients about HI (86.0%). HCW expected from information better approval of prevention programs by the patients (87.7%) but feared an increased anxiety in patients (75.4%) and a higher rate of care refusal (48.2%).
Whereas a very large proportion of HCW in psychiatry support delivering information to patients about HI, our study shows HCW's lack of awareness of regulations and lack of declared practices. Among factors explaining this contrast, a lower perceived HI risk and severity level are to be mentioned. Training programs focusing on risk and mechanisms of HI could be offered to professionals in psychiatry. The issue of specific communication difficulties with psychiatric patients should be addressed as well. In order to develop information on HI, specific methods suited to those patients should be developed.