Evaluation of the organization of pre and post transfusion screening of viral infection markers in blood recipients in France in 2001

In France, data collection related to blood recipient's viral infectious disease markers pre and post-transfusion is a legal requirement for hospitals. Our study aimed to evaluate the actual modalities of this extensive screening in 2001, six years after the Ministry of health issued recommenda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Société française de transfusion sanguine Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. 295 - 300
Main Authors: Fressy, P, Daurat, G, Duedari, N, Le Blanc, G, Taverne, D, Ounnoughène, N, Pillonel, J
Format: Journal Article
Language:French
Published: France 01-10-2005
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In France, data collection related to blood recipient's viral infectious disease markers pre and post-transfusion is a legal requirement for hospitals. Our study aimed to evaluate the actual modalities of this extensive screening in 2001, six years after the Ministry of health issued recommendations. A questionnaire was sent to the haemovigilance correspondents in hospitals having transfused labile blood products (LBP) in 2001. A total of 1463 hospitals having transfused 85% of LBP in France responded. 82.4% of hospitals have written guidelines for pre-transfusion screening of viral markers, mainly for HIV and hepatitis C. A frozen repository storage is held by 23.9% of hospitals with storage durations between 1 to 40 years. 84% of hospitals have written guidelines for post-transfusion screening. The test prescriptions are mostly done by physicians from clinical services and they include in more than 80% of cases, HIV and HCV markers. Only 12% of hospitals recontact the patient in case of a no show. Even though 77.5% of responding hospitals have labile blood products recipients follow up processes, their effectiveness remains quite low, only 16% of recipients having test results available at the hospital.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1246-7820
DOI:10.1016/j.tracli.2005.06.001