방정중접근법에 의한 경막외 천자시 피부로부터 경막외강까지의 거리의 예측인자

Background: Although the paramedian approach for epidural blockade is useful in some clinical situation, the parameters which are correlated with the distance from skin to the epidural space has not been established. Methods: We studied in 145 patients having elective continuous epidural blocks for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Korean journal of pain Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 349 - 353
Main Authors: 심재철, Jae Chol Shim, 이명의, Myoung Eui Lee, 김동
Format: Journal Article
Language:Korean
Published: 대한통증학회 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Although the paramedian approach for epidural blockade is useful in some clinical situation, the parameters which are correlated with the distance from skin to the epidural space has not been established. Methods: We studied in 145 patients having elective continuous epidural blocks for relief of postoperative pain. All blocks were performed using paramedian approach with Tuohy needle in the lumbar (group l, n=100) and thoracic (group 2, n=45) area. We measured the distance from skin to the epidural space, body weight, height, and the angle between the shaft of the needle and the skin. Data were analyzed by linear regression. The relation- ships between parameters identified by the F-test with a P value of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The mean distance from skin to the lumbar epidural space was 4.4±0.7cm. Sig- nificant correlation between the body weight and the depth of lumbar epidural space 4 value .0.492) was noted with regression equation of depth(cm)=2.293±0.034 x body weight (kg). Also the significant correlation between the ponderal index (PI) and the depth of lumbar epidural space (y value: 0.539) was noted with regression equation of depth(cm)=1. 703±0.07 x PI, The mean distance from skin to the thoracic epidural space was 5.2±0.7cm which did not correlated with other anatomic measurements. Conclusions: We found that PI and body weight are the suitable predictors of the depth of the lumbar epidural space, but not the thoracic epidural space.
Bibliography:The Korean Pain Society
KISTI1.1003/JNL.JAKO199631640760834
ISSN:2005-9159
1226-2579
2093-0569