Development of factor VIII inhibitor in three non-hemophiliac patients

Infrequently, inhibitors against factor VIII can develop in non-hemophiliac patients and cause serious bleeding. In the last year, we have experienced 3 non-hemophiliac patients who developed factor VIII inhibitors. Here, we describe the clinical courses of the three patients and the characteristics...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rinshō ketsueki Vol. 41; no. 11; p. 1195
Main Authors: Kiguchi, T, Niiya, K, Yamawaki, Y, Shima, M, Harada, M
Format: Journal Article
Language:Japanese
Published: Japan 01-11-2000
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Infrequently, inhibitors against factor VIII can develop in non-hemophiliac patients and cause serious bleeding. In the last year, we have experienced 3 non-hemophiliac patients who developed factor VIII inhibitors. Here, we describe the clinical courses of the three patients and the characteristics of the inhibitors. Case 1: A 69-year-old man underwent a partial gastrectomy because of early gastric cancer, and one month later developed signs of a bleeding tendency such as hematemesis, tarry stools and intramuscular hemorrhage. Blood coagulation tests revealed prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), which had been normal on admission. Case 2: A 78-year-old woman with no previous disease history developed generalized subcutaneous purpura. Blood coagulation tests performed on admission revealed a prolonged aPTT. Case 3: A 30-year-old man was admitted to an emergency hospital because of left intrapleural hemorrhage and liver injury caused by a traffic accident. Two months later, a hematoma developed at the site of drainage in the left chest, and blood coagulation tests revealed prolongation of the aPTT, which had been normal on admission. Plasma factor VIII procoagulant activities in cases 1, 2 and 3 were 3%, 1% and 5%, respectively. The respective factor VIII inhibitor titers were 78, 870 and 0.5 Bethesda units/ml. The immunoglobulin class and subclass of the inhibitors examined by an ELISA method were: case 1, IgG1 and 4; case 2, IgG2 and 4 (dominant); case 3, IgG4. In cases 1 and 3, the patients recovered after glucocorticoid therapy, but in case 2 the patient died of intraperitoneal hemorrhage despite receiving two courses of methylprednisolone pulse therapy. The above clinical experience suggests that patients, who develop high titers of inhibitors may be refractory to ordinary immunosuppressive therapy, and therefore more aggressive therapy such as plasma exchange and/or bypass therapy using activated prothrombin complex concentrates or an activated factor VII preparation should be considered.
ISSN:0485-1439
DOI:10.11406/rinketsu.41.1195