Does Bone SPECT Actually Have Lower Sensitivity for Detecting Vertebral Metastasis Than MRI?

We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 975 - 978
Main Authors: Kosuda, Shigeru, Kaji, Tatsumi, Yokoyama, Hisaaki, Yokokawa, Tokuzo, Katayama, Michiaki, Iriye, Toshiyuki, Uematsu, Minoru, Kusano, Shoichi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Soc Nuclear Med 01-06-1996
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane. Twenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not detected by MRI were clearly seen by bone SPECT. Extra-vertebral body metastases (e.g. in the pedicle, lamina, transverse and spinous processes) were, however, most often detected by SPECT, followed by MRI and planar imaging (40 versus 32 versus 4). Vertebral SPECT, using high-resolution SPECT equipment, produced excellent results that were comparable to and complementary with MRI in detecting vertebral metastasis. Our data suggest that vertebral SPECT is superior to MRI in detecting extra-vertebral body metastasis.
AbstractList We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane. Twenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not detected by MRI were clearly seen by bone SPECT. Extra-vertebral body metastases (e.g. in the pedicle, lamina, transverse and spinous processes) were, however, most often detected by SPECT, followed by MRI and planar imaging (40 versus 32 versus 4). Vertebral SPECT, using high-resolution SPECT equipment, produced excellent results that were comparable to and complementary with MRI in detecting vertebral metastasis. Our data suggest that vertebral SPECT is superior to MRI in detecting extra-vertebral body metastasis.
UNLABELLEDWe compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis.METHODSSkeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane.RESULTSTwenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not detected by MRI were clearly seen by bone SPECT. Extra-vertebral body metastases (e.g. in the pedicle, lamina, transverse and spinous processes) were, however, most often detected by SPECT, followed by MRI and planar imaging (40 versus 32 versus 4).CONCLUSIONVertebral SPECT, using high-resolution SPECT equipment, produced excellent results that were comparable to and complementary with MRI in detecting vertebral metastasis. Our data suggest that vertebral SPECT is superior to MRI in detecting extra-vertebral body metastasis.
We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane. Twenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not detected by MRI were clearly seen by bone SPECT. Extra-vertebral body metastases (e.g. in the pedicle, lamina, transverse and spinous processes) were, however, most often detected by SPECT, followed by MRI and planar imaging (40 versus 32 versus 4). Vertebral SPECT, using high-resolution SPECT equipment, produced excellent results that were comparable to and complementary with MRI in detecting vertebral metastasis. Our data suggest that vertebral SPECT is superior to MRI in detecting extra-vertebral body metastasis.
Author Yokoyama, Hisaaki
Katayama, Michiaki
Iriye, Toshiyuki
Uematsu, Minoru
Kosuda, Shigeru
Kusano, Shoichi
Kaji, Tatsumi
Yokokawa, Tokuzo
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Kosuda, Shigeru
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Kaji, Tatsumi
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Yokoyama, Hisaaki
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Yokokawa, Tokuzo
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Katayama, Michiaki
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Iriye, Toshiyuki
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Uematsu, Minoru
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Kusano, Shoichi
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8683325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpd0FFLwzAQB_AgytymH0EIPvhWSNrmmj6JbuoGE8VNn4SStrc1o0tnkjr27e1wIAgH9_K7uz83IKemMXhC-lxEIhAAySnpMw48EIKJczJwbs0YAyllj_QkyCgKRZ98jht09L4bpfPXh9GC3hW-VXW9pxP1jXTW7NDSORqnvf7Wfk-XjaVj9Fh4bVb0A63H3KqaPqNXrivt6KJShj6_TW8vyNlS1Q4vj31I3h8fFqNJMHt5mo7uZkEVQuwDYKwAKBDLlEkAkXc5eRJHIpdxrBjL0xK5TJQQWIIIJfBClVKlMSoQImXRkNz87t3a5qtF57ONdgXWtTLYtC5LJJcxhAd4_Q-um9aaLlsW8jSEMIl5h66OqM03WGZbqzfK7rPjz_6uVXpV7bTFzLRFjcoe8NpsoiSDLE1E9AMOvHXY
CODEN JNMEAQ
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Jun 1996
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Jun 1996
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
4T-
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M2P
M7P
M7Z
NAPCQ
P5Z
P62
P64
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
S0X
7X8
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Docstoc
Nursing & Allied Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Science Database (Alumni Edition)
STEM Database
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Biological Sciences
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Science Database
Biological Science Database
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
SIRS Editorial
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
SIRS Editorial
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest AP Science
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Docstoc
Biochemistry Abstracts 1
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Central Student
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1535-5667
EndPage 978
ExternalDocumentID 25360046
8683325
jnm37_6_975
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID -
08R
29L
2WC
3O-
3V.
53G
55
5RE
7RV
7X7
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
8WZ
A6W
ABFLS
ABSGY
ABUWG
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADACO
ADBIT
ADDZX
AENEX
AFFNX
AFKRA
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBAFP
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CS3
DIK
DU5
DWQXO
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EX3
F5P
FH7
FYUFA
GJ
GNUQQ
H13
HCIFZ
I-F
IL9
INIJC
J5H
KQ8
L7B
LK8
M1P
M2P
M2Q
M7P
OK1
P2P
P62
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
R0Z
RHF
RHI
RNS
S0X
SJN
SV3
TSM
VH1
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X
X7M
YQJ
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
---
-~X
.55
.GJ
41~
ABEFU
ABSQV
AFOSN
AI.
ALIPV
CCPQU
CGR
CUY
CVF
EBD
ECM
EIF
EMOBN
F9R
HMCUK
I4R
N4W
NAPCQ
NPM
RWL
TAE
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W8F
YHG
4T-
7XB
8FD
8FK
FR3
K9.
M7Z
P64
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-h264t-600c66ceed908665b00017435b844a00b9de187a55ed652861cad8a94ea655903
ISSN 0161-5505
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 01:56:39 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:44:46 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 07:39:50 EDT 2024
Mon Jan 18 12:03:20 EST 2021
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-h264t-600c66ceed908665b00017435b844a00b9de187a55ed652861cad8a94ea655903
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 8683325
PQID 219262741
PQPubID 40808
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_78184620
proquest_journals_219262741
pubmed_primary_8683325
highwire_nuclearmed_jnm37_6_975
ProviderPackageCode RHF
RHI
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1996-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1996-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 1996
  text: 1996-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
PublicationTitleAlternate J Nucl Med
PublicationYear 1996
Publisher Soc Nuclear Med
Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publisher_xml – name: Soc Nuclear Med
– name: Society of Nuclear Medicine
SSID ssj0006888
Score 1.8282729
Snippet We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI...
We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI...
UNLABELLEDWe compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis.METHODSSkeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
highwire
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 975
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
Spinal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Spinal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Spinal Neoplasms - secondary
Spine - diagnostic imaging
Spine - pathology
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
Title Does Bone SPECT Actually Have Lower Sensitivity for Detecting Vertebral Metastasis Than MRI?
URI http://jnm.snmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/37/6/975
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8683325
https://www.proquest.com/docview/219262741
https://search.proquest.com/docview/78184620
Volume 37
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1La9wwEBa7OZReSl-h2_ShQ2-LwQ9Jlk9pyTokbJKWxoEUCkK2bNJksy7xmpJ_3xn5uYXS9tCLMdr1g_lG8sxoZj5C3oWGy9T4hSNgOjhMpIEjWcQcloL6aLDwua1yPToPzy7lImbxZPK-8_r7sf-KNIwB1lg5-w9o9zeFATgHzOEIqMPxr3BflHk1T0uwHc8_xQcJNsuo9Wp1P79CnqEVkqLNK8xab2kjMM3Q5LiVgEEDZGfGrWQsKdlosByxXwlG1-enn49_SQIcqspWTTpIhhQU_W69bQEF3uMo1rAsq9rorYDrUl9_28rV_lLelPf6Vm8VTuDgjf6hh3-atnJPDAlVXexSeA46ROPFt-n40irZeCWNGkKV9qMcNTw_2_2yzz6qw4uTE5XEl8mUTAMPUzoXx8v-Syyk5R3tHzxqAv17h8IaFslj8qiVIP3QQPmETPL1U_LgtJXiM_IVEaWIKLWI0g5RiohSiygdIUoBUdojSntE6YAoRUQpILr_nFwcxsnBkdNyYjhXYLpuHLBPMyHQsolcbFVojXSwAnkqGdOum0Ym92SoOc-N4L4UXqaN1BHLtQDn0Q12yc4a3vgFoeBoBoIXSEIWMc-EOssDbjJWFKlbZKk_I287aalWhUBI6np9G4RKKABoRvY6Iap2ClQK5rxvCZ3g-v5XWLNwI0qv87KuVAhWIhO-OyO7jeTV96a1ipLwToHPX_7x0j3ycNCxV2Rnc1fnr8m0MvUbqwM_AbGzark
link.rule.ids 315,782,786
linkProvider Flying Publisher
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does+bone+SPECT+actually+have+lower+sensitivity+for+detecting+vertebral+metastasis+than+MRI%3F&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+nuclear+medicine+%281978%29&rft.au=Kosuda%2C+S&rft.au=Kaji%2C+T&rft.au=Yokoyama%2C+H&rft.au=Yokokawa%2C+T&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=978&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon