Does Bone SPECT Actually Have Lower Sensitivity for Detecting Vertebral Metastasis Than MRI?
We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Me...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) Vol. 37; no. 6; pp. 975 - 978 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Soc Nuclear Med
01-06-1996
Society of Nuclear Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis.
Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane.
Twenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not detected by MRI were clearly seen by bone SPECT. Extra-vertebral body metastases (e.g. in the pedicle, lamina, transverse and spinous processes) were, however, most often detected by SPECT, followed by MRI and planar imaging (40 versus 32 versus 4).
Vertebral SPECT, using high-resolution SPECT equipment, produced excellent results that were comparable to and complementary with MRI in detecting vertebral metastasis. Our data suggest that vertebral SPECT is superior to MRI in detecting extra-vertebral body metastasis. |
---|---|
AbstractList | We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane. Twenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not detected by MRI were clearly seen by bone SPECT. Extra-vertebral body metastases (e.g. in the pedicle, lamina, transverse and spinous processes) were, however, most often detected by SPECT, followed by MRI and planar imaging (40 versus 32 versus 4). Vertebral SPECT, using high-resolution SPECT equipment, produced excellent results that were comparable to and complementary with MRI in detecting vertebral metastasis. Our data suggest that vertebral SPECT is superior to MRI in detecting extra-vertebral body metastasis. UNLABELLEDWe compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis.METHODSSkeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane.RESULTSTwenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not detected by MRI were clearly seen by bone SPECT. Extra-vertebral body metastases (e.g. in the pedicle, lamina, transverse and spinous processes) were, however, most often detected by SPECT, followed by MRI and planar imaging (40 versus 32 versus 4).CONCLUSIONVertebral SPECT, using high-resolution SPECT equipment, produced excellent results that were comparable to and complementary with MRI in detecting vertebral metastasis. Our data suggest that vertebral SPECT is superior to MRI in detecting extra-vertebral body metastasis. We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane. Twenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not detected by MRI were clearly seen by bone SPECT. Extra-vertebral body metastases (e.g. in the pedicle, lamina, transverse and spinous processes) were, however, most often detected by SPECT, followed by MRI and planar imaging (40 versus 32 versus 4). Vertebral SPECT, using high-resolution SPECT equipment, produced excellent results that were comparable to and complementary with MRI in detecting vertebral metastasis. Our data suggest that vertebral SPECT is superior to MRI in detecting extra-vertebral body metastasis. |
Author | Yokoyama, Hisaaki Katayama, Michiaki Iriye, Toshiyuki Uematsu, Minoru Kosuda, Shigeru Kusano, Shoichi Kaji, Tatsumi Yokokawa, Tokuzo |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Kosuda, Shigeru – sequence: 2 fullname: Kaji, Tatsumi – sequence: 3 fullname: Yokoyama, Hisaaki – sequence: 4 fullname: Yokokawa, Tokuzo – sequence: 5 fullname: Katayama, Michiaki – sequence: 6 fullname: Iriye, Toshiyuki – sequence: 7 fullname: Uematsu, Minoru – sequence: 8 fullname: Kusano, Shoichi |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8683325$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpd0FFLwzAQB_AgytymH0EIPvhWSNrmmj6JbuoGE8VNn4SStrc1o0tnkjr27e1wIAgH9_K7uz83IKemMXhC-lxEIhAAySnpMw48EIKJczJwbs0YAyllj_QkyCgKRZ98jht09L4bpfPXh9GC3hW-VXW9pxP1jXTW7NDSORqnvf7Wfk-XjaVj9Fh4bVb0A63H3KqaPqNXrivt6KJShj6_TW8vyNlS1Q4vj31I3h8fFqNJMHt5mo7uZkEVQuwDYKwAKBDLlEkAkXc5eRJHIpdxrBjL0xK5TJQQWIIIJfBClVKlMSoQImXRkNz87t3a5qtF57ONdgXWtTLYtC5LJJcxhAd4_Q-um9aaLlsW8jSEMIl5h66OqM03WGZbqzfK7rPjz_6uVXpV7bTFzLRFjcoe8NpsoiSDLE1E9AMOvHXY |
CODEN | JNMEAQ |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Jun 1996 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Jun 1996 |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 4T- 7RV 7X7 7XB 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. KB0 LK8 M0S M1P M2P M7P M7Z NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U S0X 7X8 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Docstoc Nursing & Allied Health Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Science Database (Alumni Edition) STEM Database ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Biological Sciences Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Science Database Biological Science Database Biochemistry Abstracts 1 Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic SIRS Editorial MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials SIRS Editorial ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Biological Science Collection ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Docstoc Biochemistry Abstracts 1 ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Central Student MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ECM name: MEDLINE url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1535-5667 |
EndPage | 978 |
ExternalDocumentID | 25360046 8683325 jnm37_6_975 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | - 08R 29L 2WC 3O- 3V. 53G 55 5RE 7RV 7X7 88E 88I 8AF 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 8WZ A6W ABFLS ABSGY ABUWG ACGOD ACIWK ACPRK ADACO ADBIT ADDZX AENEX AFFNX AFKRA AFRAH AHMBA ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARAPS AZQEC BBAFP BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EBS EJD EX3 F5P FH7 FYUFA GJ GNUQQ H13 HCIFZ I-F IL9 INIJC J5H KQ8 L7B LK8 M1P M2P M2Q M7P OK1 P2P P62 PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PROAC PSQYO Q2X R0Z RHF RHI RNS S0X SJN SV3 TSM VH1 WH7 WOQ WOW X X7M YQJ ZA5 ZGI ZXP --- -~X .55 .GJ 41~ ABEFU ABSQV AFOSN AI. ALIPV CCPQU CGR CUY CVF EBD ECM EIF EMOBN F9R HMCUK I4R N4W NAPCQ NPM RWL TAE TR2 TUS UKHRP W8F YHG 4T- 7XB 8FD 8FK FR3 K9. M7Z P64 Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-h264t-600c66ceed908665b00017435b844a00b9de187a55ed652861cad8a94ea655903 |
ISSN | 0161-5505 |
IngestDate | Fri Oct 25 01:56:39 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 22:44:46 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 07:39:50 EDT 2024 Mon Jan 18 12:03:20 EST 2021 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-h264t-600c66ceed908665b00017435b844a00b9de187a55ed652861cad8a94ea655903 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 8683325 |
PQID | 219262741 |
PQPubID | 40808 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_78184620 proquest_journals_219262741 pubmed_primary_8683325 highwire_nuclearmed_jnm37_6_975 |
ProviderPackageCode | RHF RHI |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1996-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1996-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 1996 text: 1996-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Nucl Med |
PublicationYear | 1996 |
Publisher | Soc Nuclear Med Society of Nuclear Medicine |
Publisher_xml | – name: Soc Nuclear Med – name: Society of Nuclear Medicine |
SSID | ssj0006888 |
Score | 1.8282729 |
Snippet | We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis.
Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI... We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI... UNLABELLEDWe compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis.METHODSSkeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed highwire |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 975 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Middle Aged Sensitivity and Specificity Spinal Neoplasms - diagnosis Spinal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Spinal Neoplasms - secondary Spine - diagnostic imaging Spine - pathology Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon |
Title | Does Bone SPECT Actually Have Lower Sensitivity for Detecting Vertebral Metastasis Than MRI? |
URI | http://jnm.snmjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/37/6/975 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8683325 https://www.proquest.com/docview/219262741 https://search.proquest.com/docview/78184620 |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1La9wwEBa7OZReSl-h2_ShQ2-LwQ9Jlk9pyTokbJKWxoEUCkK2bNJksy7xmpJ_3xn5uYXS9tCLMdr1g_lG8sxoZj5C3oWGy9T4hSNgOjhMpIEjWcQcloL6aLDwua1yPToPzy7lImbxZPK-8_r7sf-KNIwB1lg5-w9o9zeFATgHzOEIqMPxr3BflHk1T0uwHc8_xQcJNsuo9Wp1P79CnqEVkqLNK8xab2kjMM3Q5LiVgEEDZGfGrWQsKdlosByxXwlG1-enn49_SQIcqspWTTpIhhQU_W69bQEF3uMo1rAsq9rorYDrUl9_28rV_lLelPf6Vm8VTuDgjf6hh3-atnJPDAlVXexSeA46ROPFt-n40irZeCWNGkKV9qMcNTw_2_2yzz6qw4uTE5XEl8mUTAMPUzoXx8v-Syyk5R3tHzxqAv17h8IaFslj8qiVIP3QQPmETPL1U_LgtJXiM_IVEaWIKLWI0g5RiohSiygdIUoBUdojSntE6YAoRUQpILr_nFwcxsnBkdNyYjhXYLpuHLBPMyHQsolcbFVojXSwAnkqGdOum0Ym92SoOc-N4L4UXqaN1BHLtQDn0Q12yc4a3vgFoeBoBoIXSEIWMc-EOssDbjJWFKlbZKk_I287aalWhUBI6np9G4RKKABoRvY6Iap2ClQK5rxvCZ3g-v5XWLNwI0qv87KuVAhWIhO-OyO7jeTV96a1ipLwToHPX_7x0j3ycNCxV2Rnc1fnr8m0MvUbqwM_AbGzark |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786 |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does+bone+SPECT+actually+have+lower+sensitivity+for+detecting+vertebral+metastasis+than+MRI%3F&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+nuclear+medicine+%281978%29&rft.au=Kosuda%2C+S&rft.au=Kaji%2C+T&rft.au=Yokoyama%2C+H&rft.au=Yokokawa%2C+T&rft.date=1996-06-01&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=978&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0161-5505&client=summon |