Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first‐tier clinical diagnostic test: Estonian experience

• Published in: Molecular genetics & genomic medicine Vol. 2; no. 2; pp. 166 - 175
• Main Authors: Žilina, Olga, Teek, Rita, Tammur, Pille, Kuuse, Kati, Yakoreva, Maria, Vaidla, Eve, Mölter‐Väär, Triin, Reimand, Tiia, Kurg, Ants, Õunap, Katrin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-03-2014; Wiley Periodicals, Inc
• Subjects: Chromosomal microarray analysis; copy‐number variation; developmental delay; first‐tier testing; intellectual disability; Original; postnatal diagnosis; prenatal diagnosis; copy-number variation; Chromosomal microarray analysis; developmental delay; postnatal diagnosis; first-tier testing; prenatal diagnosis; intellectual disability
• ISSN: 2324-9269; 2324-9269
• DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.57

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is now established as the first‐tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for fast and accurate detection of chromosomal abnormalities in patients with developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). We present our experience with using CMA for postnatal and prenatal diagnosis in Estonian patients during 2009–2012. Since 2011, CMA is on the official service list of the Estonian Health Insurance Fund and is performed as the first‐tier cytogenetic test for patients with DD/ID, MCA or ASD. A total of 1191 patients were analyzed, including postnatal (1072 [90%] patients and 59 [5%] family members) and prenatal referrals (60 [5%] fetuses). Abnormal results were reported in 298 (25%) patients, with a total of 351 findings (1–3 per individual): 147 (42%) deletions, 106 (30%) duplications, 89 (25%) long contiguous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH) events (>5 Mb), and nine (3%) aneuploidies. Of all findings, 143 (41%) were defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic; for another 143 findings (41%), most of which were LCSH, the clinical significance remained unknown, while 61 (18%) reported findings can now be reclassified as benign or likely benign. Clinically relevant findings were detected in 126 (11%) patients. However, the proportion of variants of unknown clinical significance was quite high (41% of all findings). It seems that our ability to detect chromosomal abnormalities has far outpaced our ability to understand their role in disease. Thus, the interpretation of CMA findings remains a rather difficult task requiring a close collaboration between clinicians and cytogeneticists.
We present our experience with using CMA for postnatal and prenatal diagnosis in Estonian patients during 2009–2012. A total of 1191 patients were analyzed and abnormal results were reported in 298 (25%) patients, with a total of 351 findings (1–3 per individual). Of all findings, 143 (41%) were defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic, 61 (18%) can now be reclassified as benign or likely benign, while for 143 findings (41%), the clinical significance remained unknown. Thus, the interpretation of CMA findings remains a rather difficult task requiring a close collaboration between clinicians and cytogeneticists.