Metal‐ion susceptibility of oral bacterial species

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of lead (Pb) on growth of bacterial species related to dental diseases in vitro. Methods and Results: The effects of lead acetate on representative species of the oral flora were examined at 0·1–10 mmol l−1 and compared with the effect of silver nitrate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Letters in applied microbiology Vol. 53; no. 3; pp. 324 - 328
Main Authors: Youravong, N, Carlen, A, Teanpaisan, R, Dahlén, G
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2011
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of lead (Pb) on growth of bacterial species related to dental diseases in vitro. Methods and Results: The effects of lead acetate on representative species of the oral flora were examined at 0·1–10 mmol l−1 and compared with the effect of silver nitrate and ferrous sulfate. The minimal inhibitory concentration of lead acetate was between 0·15 and 5 mmol l−1 for the bacterial strains tested. The minimal bactericidal concentration of lead acetate for most oral species was detected in the range of 5–10 mmol l−1. Silver nitrate at a concentration of 1·25 mmol l−1 was sufficient to exhibit antibacterial activity against almost all bacteria tested. Ferrous sulfate had the lowest effect. Conclusions: The study indicated a general antimicrobial effect of lead on oral bacterial species in the range of 0·15–10 mmol l−1. The toxicity of silver nitrate was the highest, whereas that of ferrous sulfate was the lowest. Gram‐positive species had a tendency to be less susceptible for metals than Gram‐negatives. Significance and Impact of the Study: The study shows that it is possible that microbiological changes may occur in the dental plaque in children because of toxic exposure of environmental lead.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03110.x
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0266-8254
1472-765X
1472-765X
DOI:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03110.x