Cold season CO2 emission from arctic soils

Recent evidence indicates that significant amounts of C may be lost as CO2 to the atmosphere from tundra ecosystems during the fall, winter and spring months. Because high latitude ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to climate change, and contain large soil C stocks, the annual C budget is of pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Global biogeochemical cycles Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 163 - 172
Main Authors: Oechel, W.C. (San Diego State University, CA.), Vourlitis, G, Hastings, S.J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Washington, DC Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-06-1997
American Geophysical Union
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Recent evidence indicates that significant amounts of C may be lost as CO2 to the atmosphere from tundra ecosystems during the fall, winter and spring months. Because high latitude ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to climate change, and contain large soil C stocks, the annual C budget is of particular interest. Significant amounts of CO2 loss were observed in arctic tundra ecosystems of the North Slope of Alaska during the 1993–1994 cold season. Moist tussock tundra ecosystems lost approximately 0.3 gC m−2 d−1 between mid‐October and late May while coastal wet sedge ecosystems lost on average 0.08 gC m−2 d−1. Efflux rates were greatest during the months of October and May when soil temperatures were at a maximum, and portions of the soil profile were unfrozen. These daily loss rates equate to a seasonal loss of roughly 70 and 20 gC m−2 season−1 for tussock and wet sedge tundra ecosystems, respectively. Combined with warm season estimates of net CO2 efflux, tussock tundra ecosystems were net sources of approximately 112 gC m−2 yr−1 (0.1 PgC yr−1 worldwide) over the 1993–1994 calendar year, while wet sedge ecosystems lost approximately 25 gC m−2 yr−1 (0.02 PgC yr−1 worldwide). This study indicates that estimates of annual net CO2 exchange, based on warm season measurements alone, underestimate the actual magnitude of CO2 efflux.
Bibliography:P33
9738083
ark:/67375/WNG-M5F372LD-7
ArticleID:96GB03035
istex:FCCF3210C88FFCFE8C5A396646FCF4BE4E0200B3
ISSN:0886-6236
1944-9224
DOI:10.1029/96GB03035