Development of germ cell transplants in mice
Development of spermatogonial transplants was studied by using 5- to 6-wk-old histocompatible mice as cell donors and sterile (W-locus) mice as recipients. Groups of animals transplanted with germ cell suspensions were killed at 10 min, 9 h, 24 h, 1 wk, 1 mo, 2 mo, and 3 mo along with age-matched â...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biology of reproduction Vol. 59; no. 6; pp. 1360 - 1370 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Madison, WI
Society for the Study of Reproduction
01-12-1998
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Development of spermatogonial transplants was studied by using 5- to 6-wk-old histocompatible mice as cell donors and sterile
(W-locus) mice as recipients. Groups of animals transplanted with germ cell suspensions were killed at 10 min, 9 h, 24 h,
1 wk, 1 mo, 2 mo, and 3 mo along with age-matched âstartâ and âendâ W-locus controls. Weight of testes increased significantly
at 24 h through 3 mo after germ cell transplantation, suggesting that the infused cells quickly stimulated organ function.
Small clones of young spermatocytes were evident at 1 mo and sperm at 2 mo. The percentage of tubular profiles containing
active spermatogenesis originating from spermatogonia increased with time (0.8% at 1 mo, 8.9% at 2 mo, and 28.2% at 3 mo).
Most transplanted germ cells were eliminated from the seminiferous epithelium through phagocytosis by Sertoli cells that occurred
primarily before 1 wk, although some pachytene cells were able to proceed through meiosis by 1 wk. A variety of abnormal features
are described that characterize developing spermatogenesis in the transplanted testis. Spermatogenesis improved quantitatively
and qualitatively with time although released sperm were frequently engulfed by intratubular macrophages and Sertoli cells.
A quantitative analysis of spermatogenesis from transplanted germ cells will serve as a basis for improving spermatogonial
transplant efficiency. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 1997095116 L10 L53 |
ISSN: | 0006-3363 1529-7268 |
DOI: | 10.1095/biolreprod59.6.1360 |