Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction in artificial intelligence based on left ventricular opacification

Left ventricular opacification (LVO) improves the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by enhancing the visualization of the endocardium. Manual delineation of the endocardium by sonographers has observer variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the rep...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Digital health Vol. 10; p. 20552076241260557
Main Authors: Zhu, Ye, Zhang, Zisang, Ma, Junqiang, Zhang, Yiwei, Zhu, Shuangshuang, Liu, Manwei, Zhang, Ziming, Wu, Chun, Xu, Chunyan, Wu, Anjun, Sun, Chenchen, Yang, Xin, Wang, Yonghuai, Ma, Chunyan, Cheng, Jun, Ni, Dong, Wang, Jing, Xie, Mingxing, Xue, Wufeng, Zhang, Li
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States SAGE Publications 01-01-2024
SAGE Publishing
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Left ventricular opacification (LVO) improves the accuracy of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by enhancing the visualization of the endocardium. Manual delineation of the endocardium by sonographers has observer variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to improve the reproducibility of LVO to assess LVEF. The aim was to develop an AI model and evaluate the feasibility and reproducibility of LVO in the assessment of LVEF. This retrospective study included 1305 echocardiography of 797 patients who had LVO at the Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology from 2013 to 2021. The AI model was developed by 5-fold cross validation. The validation datasets included 50 patients prospectively collected in our center and 42 patients retrospectively collected in the external institution. To evaluate the differences between LV function determined by AI and sonographers, the median absolute error (MAE), spearman correlation coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. In LVO, the MAE of LVEF between AI and manual measurements was 2.6% in the development cohort, 2.5% in the internal validation cohort, and 2.7% in the external validation cohort. Compared with two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), the left ventricular (LV) volumes and LVEF of LVO measured by AI correlated significantly with manual measurements. AI model provided excellent reliability for the LV parameters of LVO (ICC > 0.95). AI-assisted LVO enables more accurate identification of the LV endocardium and reduces observer variability, providing a more reliable way for assessing LV function.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Contributed equally.
ISSN:2055-2076
2055-2076
DOI:10.1177/20552076241260557