Stakeholders’ perceptions of integrated rainwater management approaches in the B lue N ile B asin of the E thiopian highlands

• Published in: Natural resources forum Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 244 - 254
• Main Authors: Mulema, Annet A., Lema, Zelalem, Damtew, Elias, Adie, Aberra, Ogutu, Zadoc, Duncan, Alan J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01-11-2017
• ISSN: 0165-0203; 1477-8947
• DOI: 10.1111/1477-8947.12126

Previous approaches to improve soil and water management in the Ethiopian highlands have achieved marginal success. An integrated approach to rainwater management (
RWM
) has been piloted to address interrelated problems of land degradation, livestock feed shortage, and soil erosion, in an effort to improve the resilience of rural livelihoods. However, stakeholders’ perceptions about the approach have not been documented. Using data from in‐depth interviews, this study assesses stakeholders’ knowledge, attitudes, skills and practices in the
D
iga,
J
eldu and
F
ogera districts of
E
thiopia. Our study finds gender differences in knowledge and application of integrated
RWM
strategies amongst farmers. Stakeholders interviewed appreciate fodder development because it directly addresses land degradation and livestock feed shortage, and provides extra benefits to the households. There are differences in successful
RWM
practices across the districts. Planners, researchers and policy makers engaged in innovation platforms have an increased understanding of the tools to engage multiple stakeholders in planning for
RWM
. However, inflexible extension approaches and other contextual issues limit wide‐scale use of bottom‐up approaches. We conclude that approaches to
RWM
that are holistic and engage diverse stakeholders foster the uptake of innovations. Awareness creation, collaboration, capacity development, incentives, monitoring, political will and favorable gender norms are vital to the process.