Measuring Financial Integration via Idiosyncratic Risk: What Effects Are We Really Picking Up?

We study the method proposed by Flood and Rose (FR, 2004, 2005) for checking for financial integration by estimating the risk-free rate using the idiosyncratic component of individual stock returns. Performing simulations with data with a known return generation process, we find that the FR methodol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of money, credit and banking Vol. 39; no. 5; pp. 1267 - 1273
Main Authors: PARSLEY, DAVID C., SCHLAG, CHRISTIAN
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01-08-2007
Blackwell Publishing
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Ohio State University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We study the method proposed by Flood and Rose (FR, 2004, 2005) for checking for financial integration by estimating the risk-free rate using the idiosyncratic component of individual stock returns. Performing simulations with data with a known return generation process, we find that the FR methodology produces poor estimates of the risk-free rate, and hence the FR method fails to accept integration when true. We then show analytically that the FR method actually provides an estimate of the market return, and conclude the FR methodology would also falsely accept integration as long as the market returns in the two markets do not differ widely.
Bibliography:istex:1B4965B4A5E5CBBE0515F7D4F1EA316806585A7C
ArticleID:JMCB065
ark:/67375/WNG-PD1B3WFW-0
We thank Charles Engel and Hans Stoll for helpful comments on an earlier version.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0022-2879
1538-4616
DOI:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00065.x