Phylogeography of Bacillus anthracis in the country of Georgia shows evidence of population structuring and is dissimilar to other regional genotypes

Sequence analyses and subtyping of Bacillus anthracis strains from Georgia reveal a single distinct lineage (Aust94) that is ecologically established. Phylogeographic analysis and comparisons to a global collection reveals a clade that is mostly restricted to Georgia. Within this clade, many groups...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 9; no. 7; p. e102651
Main Authors: Khmaladze, Ekaterine, Birdsell, Dawn N, Naumann, Amber A, Hochhalter, Christian B, Seymour, Meagan L, Nottingham, Roxanne, Beckstrom-Sternberg, Stephen M, Beckstrom-Sternberg, James, Nikolich, Mikeljon P, Chanturia, Gvantsa, Zhgenti, Ekaterine, Zakalashvili, Mariam, Malania, Lile, Babuadze, Giorgi, Tsertsvadze, Nikoloz, Abazashvili, Natalia, Kekelidze, Merab, Tsanava, Shota, Imnadze, Paata, Ganz, Holly H, Getz, Wayne M, Pearson, Ofori, Gajer, Pawel, Eppinger, Mark, Ravel, Jacques, Wagner, David M, Okinaka, Richard T, Schupp, James M, Keim, Paul, Pearson, Talima
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 21-07-2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sequence analyses and subtyping of Bacillus anthracis strains from Georgia reveal a single distinct lineage (Aust94) that is ecologically established. Phylogeographic analysis and comparisons to a global collection reveals a clade that is mostly restricted to Georgia. Within this clade, many groups are found around the country, however at least one subclade is only found in the eastern part. This pattern suggests that dispersal into and out of Georgia has been rare and despite historical dispersion within the country, for at least for one lineage, current spread is limited.
Bibliography:Conceived and designed the experiments: DNB MPN MK NT ST PI PK TP. Performed the experiments: EK AAN CBH MLS GC EZ MZ LM GB NA RN PG ME. Analyzed the data: EK DNB TP AAN CBH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MPN MK NT ST PI HHG WMG OP PG ME JR DMW RTO JMS SMBS JBS PK TP. Wrote the paper: DNB TP.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0102651