The Proportion of Women Who Have a Breast 4 Years after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study

There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of women who have a breast, either through conserving surgery (BCS) or reconstruction, at 4-years after diagnosis, and how this varied by patient group....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 11; no. 5; p. e0153704
Main Authors: Mennie, Joanna C, Mohanna, Pari-Naz, O'Donoghue, Joseph M, Rainsbury, Richard, Cromwell, David A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 05-05-2016
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of women who have a breast, either through conserving surgery (BCS) or reconstruction, at 4-years after diagnosis, and how this varied by patient group. We identified women with breast cancer who underwent initial BCS or mastectomy in English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals between January 2008 and December 2009 using the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. Women were assigned into one of four patient groups depending on their age at diagnosis and presence of comorbidities. The series of breast cancer procedure (BCS, mastectomy, immediate, or delayed reconstruction) undergone by each women was identified over four years, and the proportion of women with a breast calculated. Variation was examined across patient groups, and English Cancer Networks. Between 2008 and 2009, 60,959 women underwent BCS or mastectomy. The proportion with a breast at 4 years was 79.3%, and 64.0%, in women less than 70 years without, and with comorbidities. Whilst in women aged 70 and over without, and with comorbidities, proportions were 52.6%, and 38.2%, respectively. Comorbidities were associated with lower proportions of BCS, but had little effect on reconstruction rates unlike age. Networks variation of 15% or more was found within each patient group, and Cancer Networks tended to have either a high or low proportion across all four patient groups. However, while 14% of women under 70 years had undergone reconstruction, less than 2% of women aged 70 or more had this treatment option. The proportion of women diagnosed with breast cancer who retain a breast at 4 years is strongly associated with age, and presence of comorbidities. There was significant variation between Cancer Networks indicating that women's experience in England was dependent on their geographical location of treatment.
AbstractList BACKGROUND:There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of women who have a breast, either through conserving surgery (BCS) or reconstruction, at 4-years after diagnosis, and how this varied by patient group. METHODS AND FINDINGS:We identified women with breast cancer who underwent initial BCS or mastectomy in English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals between January 2008 and December 2009 using the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. Women were assigned into one of four patient groups depending on their age at diagnosis and presence of comorbidities. The series of breast cancer procedure (BCS, mastectomy, immediate, or delayed reconstruction) undergone by each women was identified over four years, and the proportion of women with a breast calculated. Variation was examined across patient groups, and English Cancer Networks. Between 2008 and 2009, 60,959 women underwent BCS or mastectomy. The proportion with a breast at 4 years was 79.3%, and 64.0%, in women less than 70 years without, and with comorbidities. Whilst in women aged 70 and over without, and with comorbidities, proportions were 52.6%, and 38.2%, respectively. Comorbidities were associated with lower proportions of BCS, but had little effect on reconstruction rates unlike age. Networks variation of 15% or more was found within each patient group, and Cancer Networks tended to have either a high or low proportion across all four patient groups. However, while 14% of women under 70 years had undergone reconstruction, less than 2% of women aged 70 or more had this treatment option. CONCLUSION:The proportion of women diagnosed with breast cancer who retain a breast at 4 years is strongly associated with age, and presence of comorbidities. There was significant variation between Cancer Networks indicating that women's experience in England was dependent on their geographical location of treatment.
Background There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of women who have a breast, either through conserving surgery (BCS) or reconstruction, at 4-years after diagnosis, and how this varied by patient group. Methods and Findings We identified women with breast cancer who underwent initial BCS or mastectomy in English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals between January 2008 and December 2009 using the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. Women were assigned into one of four patient groups depending on their age at diagnosis and presence of comorbidities. The series of breast cancer procedure (BCS, mastectomy, immediate, or delayed reconstruction) undergone by each women was identified over four years, and the proportion of women with a breast calculated. Variation was examined across patient groups, and English Cancer Networks. Between 2008 and 2009, 60,959 women underwent BCS or mastectomy. The proportion with a breast at 4 years was 79.3%, and 64.0%, in women less than 70 years without, and with comorbidities. Whilst in women aged 70 and over without, and with comorbidities, proportions were 52.6%, and 38.2%, respectively. Comorbidities were associated with lower proportions of BCS, but had little effect on reconstruction rates unlike age. Networks variation of 15% or more was found within each patient group, and Cancer Networks tended to have either a high or low proportion across all four patient groups. However, while 14% of women under 70 years had undergone reconstruction, less than 2% of women aged 70 or more had this treatment option. Conclusion The proportion of women diagnosed with breast cancer who retain a breast at 4 years is strongly associated with age, and presence of comorbidities. There was significant variation between Cancer Networks indicating that women’s experience in England was dependent on their geographical location of treatment.
There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of women who have a breast, either through conserving surgery (BCS) or reconstruction, at 4-years after diagnosis, and how this varied by patient group. We identified women with breast cancer who underwent initial BCS or mastectomy in English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals between January 2008 and December 2009 using the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. Women were assigned into one of four patient groups depending on their age at diagnosis and presence of comorbidities. The series of breast cancer procedure (BCS, mastectomy, immediate, or delayed reconstruction) undergone by each women was identified over four years, and the proportion of women with a breast calculated. Variation was examined across patient groups, and English Cancer Networks. Between 2008 and 2009, 60,959 women underwent BCS or mastectomy. The proportion with a breast at 4 years was 79.3%, and 64.0%, in women less than 70 years without, and with comorbidities. Whilst in women aged 70 and over without, and with comorbidities, proportions were 52.6%, and 38.2%, respectively. Comorbidities were associated with lower proportions of BCS, but had little effect on reconstruction rates unlike age. Networks variation of 15% or more was found within each patient group, and Cancer Networks tended to have either a high or low proportion across all four patient groups. However, while 14% of women under 70 years had undergone reconstruction, less than 2% of women aged 70 or more had this treatment option. The proportion of women diagnosed with breast cancer who retain a breast at 4 years is strongly associated with age, and presence of comorbidities. There was significant variation between Cancer Networks indicating that women's experience in England was dependent on their geographical location of treatment.
There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of women who have a breast, either through conserving surgery (BCS) or reconstruction, at 4-years after diagnosis, and how this varied by patient group. We identified women with breast cancer who underwent initial BCS or mastectomy in English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals between January 2008 and December 2009 using the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. Women were assigned into one of four patient groups depending on their age at diagnosis and presence of comorbidities. The series of breast cancer procedure (BCS, mastectomy, immediate, or delayed reconstruction) undergone by each women was identified over four years, and the proportion of women with a breast calculated. Variation was examined across patient groups, and English Cancer Networks. Between 2008 and 2009, 60,959 women underwent BCS or mastectomy. The proportion with a breast at 4 years was 79.3%, and 64.0%, in women less than 70 years without, and with comorbidities. Whilst in women aged 70 and over without, and with comorbidities, proportions were 52.6%, and 38.2%, respectively. Comorbidities were associated with lower proportions of BCS, but had little effect on reconstruction rates unlike age. Networks variation of 15% or more was found within each patient group, and Cancer Networks tended to have either a high or low proportion across all four patient groups. However, while 14% of women under 70 years had undergone reconstruction, less than 2% of women aged 70 or more had this treatment option. The proportion of women diagnosed with breast cancer who retain a breast at 4 years is strongly associated with age, and presence of comorbidities. There was significant variation between Cancer Networks indicating that women's experience in England was dependent on their geographical location of treatment.
BACKGROUNDThere are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of women who have a breast, either through conserving surgery (BCS) or reconstruction, at 4-years after diagnosis, and how this varied by patient group.METHODS AND FINDINGSWe identified women with breast cancer who underwent initial BCS or mastectomy in English National Health Service (NHS) hospitals between January 2008 and December 2009 using the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) database. Women were assigned into one of four patient groups depending on their age at diagnosis and presence of comorbidities. The series of breast cancer procedure (BCS, mastectomy, immediate, or delayed reconstruction) undergone by each women was identified over four years, and the proportion of women with a breast calculated. Variation was examined across patient groups, and English Cancer Networks. Between 2008 and 2009, 60,959 women underwent BCS or mastectomy. The proportion with a breast at 4 years was 79.3%, and 64.0%, in women less than 70 years without, and with comorbidities. Whilst in women aged 70 and over without, and with comorbidities, proportions were 52.6%, and 38.2%, respectively. Comorbidities were associated with lower proportions of BCS, but had little effect on reconstruction rates unlike age. Networks variation of 15% or more was found within each patient group, and Cancer Networks tended to have either a high or low proportion across all four patient groups. However, while 14% of women under 70 years had undergone reconstruction, less than 2% of women aged 70 or more had this treatment option.CONCLUSIONThe proportion of women diagnosed with breast cancer who retain a breast at 4 years is strongly associated with age, and presence of comorbidities. There was significant variation between Cancer Networks indicating that women's experience in England was dependent on their geographical location of treatment.
Audience Academic
Author Mennie, Joanna C
Cromwell, David A
O'Donoghue, Joseph M
Mohanna, Pari-Naz
Rainsbury, Richard
AuthorAffiliation 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Thomas Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
1 Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom
3 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
5 Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
4 Department of Breast Surgery, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, United Kingdom
Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, JAPAN
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
– name: 1 Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom
– name: 5 Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
– name: 2 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Thomas Hospital, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
– name: Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, JAPAN
– name: 4 Department of Breast Surgery, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, United Kingdom
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joanna C
  surname: Mennie
  fullname: Mennie, Joanna C
  organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Thomas Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Pari-Naz
  surname: Mohanna
  fullname: Mohanna, Pari-Naz
  organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St Thomas Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Joseph M
  surname: O'Donoghue
  fullname: O'Donoghue, Joseph M
  organization: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle Upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Richard
  surname: Rainsbury
  fullname: Rainsbury, Richard
  organization: Department of Breast Surgery, Royal Hampshire County Hospital, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Winchester, United Kingdom
– sequence: 5
  givenname: David A
  surname: Cromwell
  fullname: Cromwell, David A
  organization: Department of Health Services Research & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNk11v0zAUhiM0xD7gHyCwhITgosV2nNjhAqmrgFWatIkOJq6sE9tpMqVxsZOJ_nscmk4N2gXKReLXz3lPzrHPaXTU2MZE0UuCpyTm5MOd7VwD9XQT5CkmScwxexKdkCymk5Ti-Ojg-zg69f4O4yQWafosOqacMCE4Pomam9Kga2c31rWVbZAt0K1dmwbdlhZdwL1BgM6dAd8ihn4acB5B0Rq3F-fQqLBadm5l3PYjmqFru-lq6M0m5-CNRnNbBnO0bDu9fR49LaD25sXwPou-f_l8M7-YXF59XcxnlxOVZrSdUJFwTnLCDTUqybOEJgCpojpNgsTAqJQIQ0HncVKQnGZc5RxEQXmulE5UfBa93vluauvl0CovCQ9FC0YwDsRiR2gLd3LjqjW4rbRQyb-CdSsJoSWqNlLEOqPAlFY0ZzSPsyzNOE6KXCuitO6zfRqydfnaaGWa1kE9Mh3vNFUpV_ZeMpEIinkweDcYOPurM76V68orU9fQGNvt_pvxvg0BffMP-nh1A7WCUEDVFDbkVb2pnLEkZkQwQQI1fYQKjzbrSoV7VVRBHwW8HwUEpjW_2xV03svF8tv_s1c_xuzbA7Y0ULelt3XX3yI_BtkOVM5670zx0GSCZT8W-27IfizkMBYh7NXhAT0E7ecg_gPxlgkT
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000004770
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjps_2022_04_033
crossref_primary_10_1111_ecc_13362
crossref_primary_10_3233_BD_201047
Cites_doi 10.1038/bjc.2015.49
10.1371/journal.pmed.0030048
10.1002/bjs.6930
10.1002/sim.1970
10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.008
10.1186/1756-0500-7-587
10.1245/s10434-010-1509-y
10.1001/jamasurg.2014.548
10.1371/journal.pmed.0030025
10.1245/s10434-014-4246-9
10.1016/j.ejso.2014.12.002
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science
2016 Mennie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2016 Mennie et al 2016 Mennie et al
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science
– notice: 2016 Mennie et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2016 Mennie et al 2016 Mennie et al
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
IOV
ISR
3V.
7QG
7QL
7QO
7RV
7SN
7SS
7T5
7TG
7TM
7U9
7X2
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABJCF
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
D1I
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
H94
HCIFZ
K9.
KB.
KB0
KL.
L6V
LK8
M0K
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
M7S
NAPCQ
P5Z
P62
P64
PATMY
PDBOC
PIMPY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
PYCSY
RC3
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0153704
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Immunology Abstracts
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Agricultural Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Materials Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Materials Science Database
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
ProQuest Engineering Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Agriculture Science Database
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Engineering Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Database
Materials Science Collection
Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
Environmental Science Collection
Genetics Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Agricultural Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Health Research Premium Collection
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Natural Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Engineering Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Engineering Database
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
Ecology Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Science Collection
Entomology Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Environmental Science Database
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
Materials Science Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
Genetics Abstracts
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Materials Science Database
ProQuest Materials Science Collection
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Medical Library
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
Immunology Abstracts
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

Agricultural Science Database

MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic




Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: http://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sciences (General)
DocumentTitleAlternate Rates of Breast Retention after Breast Cancer Surgery
EISSN 1932-6203
Editor Taniyama, Yoshiaki
Editor_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yoshiaki
  surname: Taniyama
  fullname: Taniyama, Yoshiaki
EndPage e0153704
ExternalDocumentID 1787084100
oai_doaj_org_article_83d92a4cdc2b42b39969705fbdc1cddc
4046593511
A453418481
10_1371_journal_pone_0153704
27148870
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom
United Kingdom--UK
England
Midlands (England)
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom
– name: England
– name: United Kingdom--UK
– name: Midlands (England)
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: ;
GroupedDBID ---
123
29O
2WC
3V.
53G
5VS
7RV
7X2
7X7
7XC
88E
8AO
8C1
8CJ
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
ABDBF
ABIVO
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
APEBS
ARAPS
ATCPS
BAWUL
BBNVY
BBORY
BCNDV
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
BWKFM
CCPQU
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
D1I
D1J
D1K
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAP
EAS
EBD
ECM
EIF
EMOBN
ESTFP
ESX
EX3
F5P
FPL
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HH5
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
IOV
IPNFZ
IPY
ISE
ISR
ITC
K6-
KB.
KQ8
L6V
LK5
LK8
M0K
M1P
M48
M7P
M7R
M7S
M~E
NAPCQ
NPM
O5R
O5S
OK1
P2P
P62
PATMY
PDBOC
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
PV9
PYCSY
RIG
RNS
RPM
RZL
SV3
TR2
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~02
~KM
AAYXX
CITATION
AFPKN
7QG
7QL
7QO
7SN
7SS
7T5
7TG
7TM
7U9
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
H94
K9.
KL.
M7N
P64
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
RC3
7X8
5PM
AAPBV
ABPTK
N95
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-285771b17e2ec5b9525aa6c2d657e24aec618e2adb35f1b297cb7a8f27bccd5c3
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 1932-6203
IngestDate Sun Aug 06 00:16:04 EDT 2023
Tue Oct 22 15:14:18 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 17 21:10:54 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 21:26:27 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 19:25:49 EDT 2024
Tue Nov 19 20:58:42 EST 2024
Tue Nov 12 23:27:58 EST 2024
Thu Aug 01 19:56:06 EDT 2024
Thu Aug 01 20:12:43 EDT 2024
Tue Aug 20 22:12:40 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 21:56:00 EST 2024
Wed Oct 16 00:49:51 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Language English
License This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Creative Commons Attribution License
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c692t-285771b17e2ec5b9525aa6c2d657e24aec618e2adb35f1b297cb7a8f27bccd5c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: JCM DAC. Performed the experiments: JCM. Analyzed the data: JCM. Wrote the paper: JCM PM JMOD RR DAC.
Competing Interests: Funding was partly received from Johnson and Johnson. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. No authors have a financial, non-financial, professional, or personal relationship with Johnson and Johnson. The authors and the work submitted have no relationship with Johnson and Johnson in terms of employment, consultancy, patents, products in development, or marketed products. Johnson and Johnson had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to publish. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4858207/
PMID 27148870
PQID 1787084100
PQPubID 1436336
ParticipantIDs plos_journals_1787084100
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_83d92a4cdc2b42b39969705fbdc1cddc
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4858207
proquest_miscellaneous_1787479525
proquest_journals_1787084100
gale_infotracmisc_A453418481
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A453418481
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A453418481
gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A453418481
gale_healthsolutions_A453418481
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0153704
pubmed_primary_27148870
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-05-05
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-05-05
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-05-05
  day: 05
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: San Francisco
– name: San Francisco, CA USA
PublicationTitle PloS one
PublicationTitleAlternate PLoS One
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Public Library of Science
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Publisher_xml – name: Public Library of Science
– name: Public Library of Science (PLoS)
References R Jeevan (ref5)
EL Franco (ref9) 2006; 3
R Jeevan (ref6) 2010; 36
M Morrow (ref18) 2014; 149
(ref20) 2008
G Laurence (ref24) 2011
R Raine (ref25) 2010; 14
R Jeevan (ref1) 2011
AK Alderman (ref17) 2001; 18
(ref12) 1990
DJ Speigelhalter (ref14) 2005; 24
JM Escriba (ref3) 2014; 7
ref23
ref26
S McPhail (ref21) 2015; 112
(ref7) 2009
ref22
(ref28) 2011
AD Morris (ref2) 1997; 3
(ref10) 2012
R Jeevan (ref27) 2010
(ref11) 1992
(ref19) 2009
MK Kim (ref15) 2015
JN Armitage (ref13) 2010; 97
DM Atisha (ref16) 2015; 22
A Donabedian (ref29) 1998; 121
(ref4) 2002
S Eaker (ref8) 2006; 3
References_xml – year: 2011
  ident: ref28
– year: 2002
  ident: ref4
– year: 2010
  ident: ref27
  contributor:
    fullname: R Jeevan
– volume: 112
  start-page: 108
  year: 2015
  ident: ref21
  article-title: Stage at diagnosis and early mortality from cancer in England
  publication-title: British Journal of Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.49
  contributor:
    fullname: S McPhail
– volume: 14
  start-page: 340
  year: 2010
  ident: ref25
  article-title: Social variations in access to hospital care for patients with colorectal, breast, and lung cancer between 1999 and 2006: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics
  publication-title: BMJ
  contributor:
    fullname: R Raine
– volume: 3
  start-page: 6
  year: 1997
  ident: ref2
  article-title: Breast-conserving therapy vs mastectomy in early stage breast cancer: a meta-analysis of 10-year survival
  publication-title: Cancer J
  contributor:
    fullname: AD Morris
– year: 2009
  ident: ref7
– volume: 3
  start-page: 47
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  ident: ref9
  article-title: Epidemiology as a toll to reveal inequalities in breast cancer care
  publication-title: PLOS Medicine
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030048
  contributor:
    fullname: EL Franco
– year: 2009
  ident: ref19
– ident: ref22
– volume: 121
  start-page: 1145
  issue: 11
  year: 1998
  ident: ref29
  article-title: The quality of care: How can it be assessed?
  publication-title: JAMA
  contributor:
    fullname: A Donabedian
– year: 1990
  ident: ref12
– volume: 97
  start-page: 772
  issue: 5
  year: 2010
  ident: ref13
  article-title: On behalf of the Royal College of Surgeons Co-morbidity Consensus Group. Identifying co-morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.6930
  contributor:
    fullname: JN Armitage
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1185
  year: 2005
  ident: ref14
  article-title: Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance
  publication-title: Statist. Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.1970
  contributor:
    fullname: DJ Speigelhalter
– volume: 36
  start-page: 750
  year: 2010
  ident: ref6
  article-title: Regional variation in use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in England
  publication-title: EJSO
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.008
  contributor:
    fullname: R Jeevan
– volume: 7
  start-page: 587
  year: 2014
  ident: ref3
  article-title: Trends in the surgical procedures of women with incident breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain, over a 7-year period (2005–2001)
  publication-title: BMC Research Notes
  doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-587
  contributor:
    fullname: JM Escriba
– year: 1992
  ident: ref11
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1748
  issue: 6
  year: 2001
  ident: ref17
  article-title: Receipt of Delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: Do women revisit the decision
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1509-y
  contributor:
    fullname: AK Alderman
– year: 2011
  ident: ref24
  contributor:
    fullname: G Laurence
– year: 2012
  ident: ref10
– volume: 149
  start-page: 1015
  issue: 10
  year: 2014
  ident: ref18
  article-title: Access to breast reconstruction after mastectomy and patient perspectives on reconstruction decision making
  publication-title: JAMA Surgery
  doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.548
  contributor:
    fullname: M Morrow
– volume: 3
  start-page: 321
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  ident: ref8
  article-title: Differences in management of older women influence breast cancer survival: Results from a population-based database in Sweden
  publication-title: PLOS Medicine
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030025
  contributor:
    fullname: S Eaker
– ident: ref23
– ident: ref26
– volume: 22
  start-page: 361
  year: 2015
  ident: ref16
  article-title: A National Snapshot of Satisfaction with Breast Cancer Procedures
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4246-9
  contributor:
    fullname: DM Atisha
– ident: ref5
  contributor:
    fullname: R Jeevan
– start-page: 426
  year: 2015
  ident: ref15
  article-title: Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery
  publication-title: EJSO
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.12.002
  contributor:
    fullname: MK Kim
– year: 2011
  ident: ref1
  contributor:
    fullname: R Jeevan
– year: 2008
  ident: ref20
SSID ssj0053866
Score 2.2592103
Snippet There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of women who...
Background There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion...
BACKGROUNDThere are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion of...
BACKGROUND:There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion...
Background There are numerous pathways in breast cancer treatment, many of which enable women to retain a breast after treatment. We evaluated the proportion...
SourceID plos
doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage e0153704
SubjectTerms Age
Age Factors
Aged
Analysis
Breast - surgery
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cancer
Cancer research
Cancer surgery
Clinical medicine
Cohort analysis
Cohort Studies
Comorbidity
Diagnosis
Female
Geographical distribution
Health aspects
Hospitals
Humans
Identification methods
Mammaplasty - statistics & numerical data
Mastectomy
Medical diagnosis
Medical screening
Medicine and Health Sciences
Middle Aged
Mortality
Networks
Patients
Plastic surgery
Population studies
Population-based studies
Psychological aspects
Reconstruction
State Medicine - statistics & numerical data
Surgery
United Kingdom - epidemiology
Variation
Women
Womens health
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lj9MwELagJy6I5bWBXTAICThkN3b8Cre27KpcYEV5niI_Uoq0SqqmReLfM3aciKCV4MDVnlrtfN94xuo8EHpGM2eUlUUqKytSJp1LjdM2FZnLdGEIMwHpxVK-_aJen_k2OcOoL58T1rUH7hR3qnJXUM2ss9QwasCfikJmfGWcJdY5G27fTPSPqe4OBisWIhbK5ZKcRlxONk1dnYADzGUczNY7otCvf7iVJ5vLpr0q5Pwzc_I3V3R-C92MMSSedt_9AF2r6tvoIFppi1_EVtIv76AaWIAv_CCErQcANyscRlbiz-sGL_SPCms882npO8zwVyB9i8PQ8H5x7jmxxcuudvoVnuKLYeBXOgMH6PC8WcPh2Ocj_ryLPp6ffZgv0jhhIbWioLuUKi4lMURWtLLcFJxyrYWlTnBYYhrwI6qi2pmcr4ihhbRGarWi0ljruM3voUkNOj1EmPGCqMxXcOWOKUaUshpCOwjQMqKdJAlKe3WXm66RRhn-TZPwAOn0Vnp4yghPgmYek0HWt8EOC0COMpKj_Bs5EvTYI1p2NaWDMZdTxsF7-0kCCXoaJHwrjNrn2nzT-7Yt37z79A9Cy_cjoedRaNUAN6yO9Q3wm3yLrZHk0UgSDNqOtg89_3qttCXxlyqoNMvgkz0nr95-Mmz7Q33-XF01-06GSY9vgu53FB40SyU8ieGIBMkRuUeqH-_U39ehEzlTHCJI-eB_YPUQ3YBgVIRkUn6EJrvtvjpG11u3fxRs-xcmn1OU
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title The Proportion of Women Who Have a Breast 4 Years after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148870
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1787084100
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1787479525
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4858207
https://doaj.org/article/83d92a4cdc2b42b39969705fbdc1cddc
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153704
Volume 11
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lj9MwELZoT1wQy2sDy2IQEnBIGzt27HBry67KAagoz1PkR7pdaTepmnal_feMnYc2aA-Iqz2J2vm-8YzbeSD0mkZWSyPSUOQmCZmwNtRWmTCJbKRSTZj2SM-X4vMv-eHEtcnhbS2MT9o3-nxUXFyOivO1z63cXJpxmyc2XnyaMcnBcYnxAA0gNmyv6PXxCwacJE2NXCzIuIFktCmLfAS-LxaRm8VDBdwDpBtRfMMd-a793dk83FyU1W2B59_5kzcc0ul9dK-JJPGk_sQH6E5ePEAHja1W-G3TUPrdQ1QAF_DCjUPYOhhwucJ-cCX-uS7xXF3lWOGpS07fYYZ_A_Ur7EeHt4szx4wtXtYV1O_xBC-6sV_hFNygxbNyDS_HLivx-hH6fnrybTYPmzkLoUlSugup5EIQTUROc8N1yilXKjHUJhyWmAIUicypsjrmK6JpKowWSq6o0MZYbuLHaFiAeg8RZjwlMnJ1XLFlkhEpjYIAD8K0iCgrSIDCVt3Zpm6nkfn_1ARcQ2q9ZQ6prEEqQFOHSSfrmmH7hXJ7ljWUyGRsU6qYsYZqRjWEXEkqIr7S1hBjrQnQC4doVleWdiadTRgHH-7mCQTolZdwDTEKl3FzpvZVlX388uMfhJZfe0JvGqFVCdwwqqlygO_kGm31JI96kmDWprd96PjXaqXKiDtaQaVRBE-2nLx9-2W37V7qsuiKvNzXMkw4fAP0pKZwp9nWIAIkeuTuqb6_A-bp-5E35vj0v598hu5CHJr4PFJ-hIa77T5_jgaV3R_730iOvYX_AVBAU9Q
link.rule.ids 230,315,729,782,786,866,887,2106,27933,27934,53800,53802
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF7RcIALUF41FLogJODgxF7vetfcktAqFW2JSClwsvbhNJVaO4oTJP49s-uHatQD6nVnbMnzzWvleSD0jgRGCc0Tn2c69ik3xldGaj8OTCATFVLlkJ7M-MlP8XnfjslhTS-MK9rX6qKfX17184uFq61cXulBUyc2mB6PqWAQuPhgC90Few2C5pJeOWA4iuO6Sy7i4aAGpb8s8qwP0S_igd3GQzjcBIRdUnwtILm5_a137i0vi_Km1PPfCsprIeng4S0_5hF6UOegeFiRt9GdLH-MtmsrL_GHehT1xycoBy3CU7tIYWUBxMUcu5WX-MeiwBP5O8MSj2xZ-xpT_AuMpsRu6XhzOLY6tcKzqvf6Ex7iabswzB9BADV4XCzg5djWM_55ir4f7J-OJ369ocHXcULWPhGM81CFPCOZZiphhEkZa2JiBkdUAv6hyIg0KmLzUJGEa8WlmBOutDZMR89QLwdYdhCmLAlFYDvAIkMFDYXQElJDSPCCUBoeeshvYEqX1SCO1P2N43CBqeSWWoTTGmEPjSyWLa8do-0OitV5Wss_FZFJiKTaaKIoUZCsxQkP2FwZHWpjtIf2rCakVU9q6wzSIWUQ_e0mAg-9dRx2lEZua3XO5aYs08OvZ__BNPvWYXpfM80L0Ckt6_4I-CY7oqvDudvhBIegO-Qdq7eNVMo0tE4ZRBoE8GSjyzeT37Rk-1Jbf5dnxabiodzi66Hnleq3km0MyUO8YxQd0XcpYAtuknmt-y9u_eQeujc5PT5Kjw5PvrxE9yGbjV01KttFvfVqk71CW6XZvHb-4S929Whp
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1bb9MwFLZYkRAvwLgtMJhBSMBD2sSxY4e3tlvVCRgVhQFPkS_pOmlLqqZF4t9z7Fy0oD0geLWPLeV852blXBB6RQKjhOaJzzMd-5Qb4ysjtR8HJpCJCqlySE_n_OS7ODyybXLaUV8uaV-r835-cdnPz5cut3J1qQdNnthg9nFMBQPHxQcrsxjsoJugswFpHuqVEYalOK4r5SIeDmpg-qsiz_rgASMe2Ik8hMNrQNhBxVeckuvd31ro3uqiKK8LP__MorziliZ3_-OD7qE7dSyKhxXJLrqR5ffRbq3tJX5Tt6R--wDlIE14ZgcqrC2QuFhgN_oSf1sWeCp_ZljikU1v32CKf4DylNgNH28Wx1a21nhe1WC_w0M8aweH-SNwpAaPiyVcjm1e46-H6Ovk6Mt46teTGnwdJ2TjE8E4D1XIM5JpphJGmJSxJiZmsEQlyEEoMiKNitgiVCThWnEpFoQrrQ3T0SPUywGaPYQpS0IR2EqwyFBBQyG0hBARAr0glIaHHvIbqNJV1ZAjdX_lODxkKr6lFuW0RtlDI4tnS2vbabuFYn2W1hikIjIJkVQbTRQlCoK2OOEBWyijQ22M9tCBlYa0qk1tjUI6pAyiADuRwEMvHYVtqZHbnJ0zuS3L9PjT6V8QzT93iF7XRIsC5ErLuk4Cvsm26upQ7ncowTDozvaeld2GK2UaWuMMLA0CONnI8_XbL9pte6nNw8uzYlvRUG7x9dDjSvxbzjbK5CHeUYwO67s7oA-uo3kt_0_--eQBujU7nKQfjk_eP0W3IaiNXVIq20e9zXqbPUM7pdk-dybiN7W7auk
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Proportion+of+Women+Who+Have+a+Breast+4+Years+after+Breast+Cancer+Surgery%3A+A+Population-Based+Cohort+Study&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Mennie%2C+Joanna+C&rft.au=Mohanna%2C+Pari-Naz&rft.au=O%27Donoghue%2C+Joseph+M&rft.au=Rainsbury%2C+Richard&rft.date=2016-05-05&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e0153704&rft.epage=e0153704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0153704&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon