The social nestwork: tree structure determines nest placement in Kenyan weaverbird colonies

Group living is a life history strategy employed by many organisms. This strategy is often difficult to study because the exact boundaries of a group can be unclear. Weaverbirds present an ideal model for the study of group living, because their colonies occupy a space with discrete boundaries: a si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one Vol. 9; no. 2; p. e88761
Main Authors: Echeverry-Galvis, Maria Angela, Peterson, Jennifer K, Sulo-Caceres, Rajmonda
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Public Library of Science 13-02-2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Group living is a life history strategy employed by many organisms. This strategy is often difficult to study because the exact boundaries of a group can be unclear. Weaverbirds present an ideal model for the study of group living, because their colonies occupy a space with discrete boundaries: a single tree. We examined one aspect of group living. nest placement, in three Kenyan weaverbird species: the Black-capped Weaver (Pseudonigrita cabanisi), Grey-capped Weaver (P. arnaudi) and White-browed Sparrow Weaver (Ploceropasser mahali). We asked which environmental, biological, and/or abiotic factors influenced their nest arrangement and location in a given tree. We used machine learning to analyze measurements taken from 16 trees and 516 nests outside the breeding season at the Mpala Research Station in Laikipia Kenya, along with climate data for the area. We found that tree architecture, number of nests per tree, and nest-specific characteristics were the main variables driving nest placement. Our results suggest that different Kenyan weaverbird species have similar priorities driving the selection of where a nest is placed within a given tree. Our work illustrates the advantage of using machine learning techniques to investigate biological questions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MAEG RS. Performed the experiments: MAEG JKP RS. Analyzed the data: RS MAEG JKP. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RS MAEG JKP. Wrote the paper: MAEG JKP RS.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0088761