A roaring trade? The legal trade in Panthera leo bones from Africa to East-Southeast Asia

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 12; no. 10; p. e0185996
• Main Authors: Williams, Vivienne L, Loveridge, Andrew J, Newton, David J, Macdonald, David W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 24-10-2017; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Africa; Animal populations; Animals; Annual reports; Appendix; Asia, Southeastern; Biology and Life Sciences; Body parts; Bone and Bones; Bones; CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species); Commerce; Consolidation; Continents; Criminal investigations; Demographic aspects; Environmental science; Exports; International trade; Lion; Lions; Medicine and Health Sciences; Panthera leo; People and Places; Poaching; Populations; Profits; Prosecutions; Protected areas; Protection and preservation; Wild animal trade; Wildcats; Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; Wildlife trade; Zoology; South Africa; Laos; Southeast Asia; Africa
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185996
• EISSN: 1932-6203

The African lion is the only big cat listed on CITES Appendix II, and the only one for which international commercial trade is legal under CITES. The trade in lion body parts, and especially the contentious trade in bones from South Africa to Asia, has raised concerns spanning continents and cultures. Debates were amplified at the 2016 CITES Conference of the Parties (CoP17) when a proposal to up-list lions to Appendix I was not supported and a compromise to keep them on Appendix II, with a bone trade quota for South Africa, was reached instead. CoP17 underscored a need for further information on the lion bone trade and the consequences for lions across the continent. Legal international trade in bones to Asia, allegedly to supply the substitute 'tiger bone' market, began in South Africa in February 2008 when the first CITES permits were issued. It was initially unclear the degree to which bones were sourced from captive-origin lions, and whether trade was a threat to wild lion populations. Our original assessment of the legal CITES-permitted lion bone trade from South Africa to East-Southeast Asia was for the period 2008-2011 (published 2015). In this paper, we consolidate new information that has become available for 2012-2016, including CITES reports from other African countries, and data on actual exports for three years to 2016 supplied by a freight forwarding company. Thus, we update the figures on the legal trade in lion bones from Africa to East-Southeast Asia in the period 2008-2016. We also contextualise the basis for global concerns by reviewing the history of the trade and its relation to tigers, poaching and wildlife trafficking. CITES permits issued to export bones escalated from ±314y-1 skeletons from 2008-2011, to ±1312y-1 skeletons from 2013-2015. South Africa was the only legal exporter of bones to Asia until 2013 when Namibia issued permits to export skeletons to Vietnam. While CITES permits to export ±5363 skeletons from Africa to Asia from 2008-2015 were issued (99.1% from South Africa; 0.7% from Namibia) (51% for Laos), actual exports were less than stated on the permits. However, information on actual exports from 2014-2016 indicated that >3400 skeletons were exported in that period. In total, >6000 skeletons weighing no less than 70 tonnes have been shipped to East-Southeast Asia since 2008. Since few wild lions are hunted and poached within South African protected areas, skeletons for the legal trade appear to be derived from captive bred lions. However, confirmation of a 116kg shipment from Uganda to Laos, and reports of lion poaching in neighbouring countries, indicate that urgent proactive monitoring and evaluation of the legal and illegal trade is necessary in African lion range states where vulnerable wild lion populations are likely to be adversely affected.