American marten respond to seismic lines in northern Canada at two spatial scales
Development of hydrocarbon resources across northwest Canada has spurred economic prosperity and generated concerns over impacts to biodiversity. To balance these interests, numerous jurisdictions have adopted management thresholds that allow for limited energy development but minimize undesirable i...
Saved in:
Published in: | PloS one Vol. 10; no. 3; p. e0118720 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Public Library of Science
13-03-2015
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Development of hydrocarbon resources across northwest Canada has spurred economic prosperity and generated concerns over impacts to biodiversity. To balance these interests, numerous jurisdictions have adopted management thresholds that allow for limited energy development but minimize undesirable impacts to wildlife. Used for exploration, seismic lines are the most abundant linear feature in the boreal forest and exist at a variety of widths and recovery states. We used American marten (Martes americana) as a model species to measure how line attributes influence species' response to seismic lines, and asked whether responses to individual lines trigger population impacts. Marten response to seismic lines was strongly influenced by line width and recovery state. Compared to forest interiors, marten used open seismic lines ≥ 3 m wide less often, but used open lines ≤ 2 m wide and partially recovered lines ≥ 6 m wide similarly. Marten response to individual line types appeared to trigger population impacts. The probability of occurrence at the home range scale declined with increasing seismic line density, and the inclusion of behavioral response to line density calculations improved model fit. In our top performing model, we excluded seismic lines ≤ 2 m from our calculation of line density, and the probability of occurrence declined > 80% between home ranges with the lowest and highest line densities. Models that excluded seismic lines did not strongly explain occurrence. We show how wildlife-derived metrics can inform regulatory guidelines to increase the likelihood those guidelines meet intended management objectives. With respect to marten, not all seismic lines constitute disturbances, but avoidance of certain line types scales to population impacts. This approach provides the ecological context required to understand cause and effect relationships among socio-economic and ecological conservation goals. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Current address: Explor, Suite 1500, 630 6th Ave SW, Calgary, Alberta T2P 0S8, Canada Conceived and designed the experiments: JT EMB SB. Performed the experiments: JT. Analyzed the data: JT EMB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JT EMB SB. Wrote the paper: JT EMB SB. Competing Interests: The authors received funding and in-kind support for this research from a number of sources across a broad spectrum of stakeholder groups including commercial interests, government agencies, and First Nations groups. Commercial sources of funding and in-kind support came from professional societies, oil companies, and oil field service providers including Canadian Association of Geophysical Contractors, IHS Energy, Apache Canada, Canadian Natural, EOG Canada, Nexen, and Nabors International. Neither this commercial support, nor support from other non-commercial interests influenced the design, execution, or reporting of this study. This support does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. No funders had any role in this research outside of providing financial or in-kind support. Funders did not influence study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript in any way. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0118720 |