Comparison of oral capecitabine alone versus platinum combinations in elderly metastatic gastric cancer patients
Background: Gastric cancer is responsible for a considerable proportion of all cancer-related deaths. Elderly cancer patients are often ignored in prospective studies in which the efficacy of chemotherapy is evaluated, although more than half of all gastric cancer cases are over the age of 70 years....
Saved in:
Published in: | Dicle tıp dergisi Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 567 - 573 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Diyarbakir
Dicle University
16-09-2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Background: Gastric cancer is responsible for a considerable
proportion of all cancer-related deaths. Elderly cancer patients are often
ignored in prospective studies in which the efficacy of chemotherapy is
evaluated, although more than half of all gastric cancer cases are over the age
of 70 years. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of
capecitabine-based chemotherapies in geriatric patients with gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 81 patients over
the age of 65 years who received chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer at
two oncology centers between 2012 and 2017 were included in the study. The
medical records of the patients were evaluated retrospectively, and the
patients and their performance status were evaluated using the American Joint
Committee on Cancer staging system and the World Health Organisation scale,
respectively. Results: The mean age was 74 years. The
male gender and the adenocarcinoma histological type were seen in higher rates.
Most of the patients underwent capecitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy, and the
mean follow-up was 42 months. The median overall survival of the groups of
patients receiving capecitabine-cisplatin, capecitabine-oxaliplatin and
capecitabine was 8 months, 10.7 months and 8.9 months, respectively, indicating
no statistically significant differences between the groups (p=0.467). The
median overall survival of all patients was found to be 8.7. The
progression-free survival between the different chemotherapy subgroups was not
statistically significant (p=0.59). The most common side effect was found to be
anemia. Grade 3–4 adverse effects were similar between the arms of the study
(p=0.725). A statistically significant increase was found in the mortality risk
with an increased number of metastatic sites in a multivariate analysis
(p=0.001). No correlation was found between the chemotherapy protocols and
mortality risk (p=0.472). Adverse effects such as stomatitis, nausea/vomiting,
neuropathy, neutropenic fever and nephrotoxicity, independent of chemotherapy,
were statistically and significantly associated with the mortality risk
(p=0.045, p=0.047, p=0.036, p=0.02 and p=0.049, respectively).
Conclusions: Our study results
show that adverse effects such as stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, neutropenic
fever, nephrotoxicity and neuropathy increase the mortality risk which suggest
that particularly oral health care, the application of appropriate antiemetic
treatments, the close follow-up of kidney function tests and adequate
hydration, protective infection barrier measures and effective treatment of
neuropathy associated with chronic diseases are as important as chemotherapy in
geriatric cases.
Amaç: Mide kanseri, kanser kaynaklı ölümlerin önemli
bir kısmını oluşturmaktadır. Tüm mide
kanseri olgularının yarısından fazlası 70 yaş üzerinde olmasına rağmen yaşlı
kanser hastalar kemoterapi etkinliğinin değerlendirildiği prospektif
çalışmalarda kendilerine yer bulamamaktadırlar. Biz
bu çalışmada iki onkoloji merkezindeki geriyatrik gastrik kanserli hastalarda
kapesitabin bazlı kemoterapilerin etkinliğini ve uygulanabilirliğini
araştırmayı amaçladık.
Materyal-metod: Çalışmaya iki merkezden metastatik mide
kanseri tanısı ile 2012- 2017 yılları arasında kemoterapi alan 65 yaş üzeri
hastalar alındı. Hasta dosyaları retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar
Amerikan Kanser Komitesi evrelendirme sistemi ve performans statusu Dünya
Sağlık Örgütü skalasına göre değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 81 hastada
ortalama yaş 74 idi. Erkek cinsiyet ve adenokarsinom histolojik tip daha yüksek
orandaydı. Hastaların çoğunluğuna kapesitabin-sisplatin kemoterapisi
verilmişti. Hastaların ortalama takip süresi 42 aydır. Kapesitabin-sisplatin,
kapesitabin-okzaliplatin, kapesitabin
kemoterapisi alan grupların median tüm sağ kalım sırasıyla 8 ay, 10,7 ay
ve 8,9 ay olarak saptandı, arada istatistiksel fark bulunmadı (p=0,467). Tüm
hastaların median tüm sağ kalım 8,7 bulundu.
Kemoterapi alt grupları aralarındaki progresyonsuz sağ kalım farkı
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir (p=0,59). En sık yan etki anemi olarak
saptandı. Grad 3-4 yan etkiler kollar arası benzerdi (p=0,725). Çok değişkenli
analizde metastatik bölge sayısı ile mortalite riski istatistiksel anlamlı
artış göstermiştir (p=0,001). Kemoterapi protokolleri ile mortalite riski arası
ilişki yoktur (p=0,472). Kemoterapiden bağımsız olarak stomatit, bulantı-kusma,
nöropati, nötropenik ateş ve nefrotoksisite yan etkileri mortalite riski ile
istatistiksel anlamlı ilişki içindedir (sırasıyla p=0,045, p=0,047, p=0,036,
p=0,02 ve p=0,049).
Sonuç: Çalışmamızda evre IV mide kanserli olgularda 8,7 ay
tüm sağ kalıma ulaşılmıştır. Kemoterapi alt gruplarında ise hem yan etki hem de sağ
kalımlar açısından anlamlı fark
yoktur. Stomatit, bulantı-kusma, nötropenik ateş, nefrotoksisite
ve nöropati yan etkilerinin mortalite riskini arttırması, geriyatrik olgularda
özellikle ağız bakımı, uygun antiemetik tedavi uygulanması, böbrek fonksiyon
testlerininin sıkı takibi ve yeterli hidrasyon, enfeksiyon açısından koruyucu
bariyer tedbirler ve nöropati ilişkili kronik hastalıkların etkin tedavisinin
en az kemoterapi uygulanması kadar önem taşıdığını göstermiştir. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background: Gastric cancer is responsible for a considerable
proportion of all cancer-related deaths. Elderly cancer patients are often
ignored in prospective studies in which the efficacy of chemotherapy is
evaluated, although more than half of all gastric cancer cases are over the age
of 70 years. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of
capecitabine-based chemotherapies in geriatric patients with gastric cancer. Methods: A total of 81 patients over
the age of 65 years who received chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer at
two oncology centers between 2012 and 2017 were included in the study. The
medical records of the patients were evaluated retrospectively, and the
patients and their performance status were evaluated using the American Joint
Committee on Cancer staging system and the World Health Organisation scale,
respectively. Results: The mean age was 74 years. The
male gender and the adenocarcinoma histological type were seen in higher rates.
Most of the patients underwent capecitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy, and the
mean follow-up was 42 months. The median overall survival of the groups of
patients receiving capecitabine-cisplatin, capecitabine-oxaliplatin and
capecitabine was 8 months, 10.7 months and 8.9 months, respectively, indicating
no statistically significant differences between the groups (p=0.467). The
median overall survival of all patients was found to be 8.7. The
progression-free survival between the different chemotherapy subgroups was not
statistically significant (p=0.59). The most common side effect was found to be
anemia. Grade 3–4 adverse effects were similar between the arms of the study
(p=0.725). A statistically significant increase was found in the mortality risk
with an increased number of metastatic sites in a multivariate analysis
(p=0.001). No correlation was found between the chemotherapy protocols and
mortality risk (p=0.472). Adverse effects such as stomatitis, nausea/vomiting,
neuropathy, neutropenic fever and nephrotoxicity, independent of chemotherapy,
were statistically and significantly associated with the mortality risk
(p=0.045, p=0.047, p=0.036, p=0.02 and p=0.049, respectively).
Conclusions: Our study results
show that adverse effects such as stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, neutropenic
fever, nephrotoxicity and neuropathy increase the mortality risk which suggest
that particularly oral health care, the application of appropriate antiemetic
treatments, the close follow-up of kidney function tests and adequate
hydration, protective infection barrier measures and effective treatment of
neuropathy associated with chronic diseases are as important as chemotherapy in
geriatric cases.
Amaç: Mide kanseri, kanser kaynaklı ölümlerin önemli
bir kısmını oluşturmaktadır. Tüm mide
kanseri olgularının yarısından fazlası 70 yaş üzerinde olmasına rağmen yaşlı
kanser hastalar kemoterapi etkinliğinin değerlendirildiği prospektif
çalışmalarda kendilerine yer bulamamaktadırlar. Biz
bu çalışmada iki onkoloji merkezindeki geriyatrik gastrik kanserli hastalarda
kapesitabin bazlı kemoterapilerin etkinliğini ve uygulanabilirliğini
araştırmayı amaçladık.
Materyal-metod: Çalışmaya iki merkezden metastatik mide
kanseri tanısı ile 2012- 2017 yılları arasında kemoterapi alan 65 yaş üzeri
hastalar alındı. Hasta dosyaları retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Hastalar
Amerikan Kanser Komitesi evrelendirme sistemi ve performans statusu Dünya
Sağlık Örgütü skalasına göre değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 81 hastada
ortalama yaş 74 idi. Erkek cinsiyet ve adenokarsinom histolojik tip daha yüksek
orandaydı. Hastaların çoğunluğuna kapesitabin-sisplatin kemoterapisi
verilmişti. Hastaların ortalama takip süresi 42 aydır. Kapesitabin-sisplatin,
kapesitabin-okzaliplatin, kapesitabin
kemoterapisi alan grupların median tüm sağ kalım sırasıyla 8 ay, 10,7 ay
ve 8,9 ay olarak saptandı, arada istatistiksel fark bulunmadı (p=0,467). Tüm
hastaların median tüm sağ kalım 8,7 bulundu.
Kemoterapi alt grupları aralarındaki progresyonsuz sağ kalım farkı
istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildir (p=0,59). En sık yan etki anemi olarak
saptandı. Grad 3-4 yan etkiler kollar arası benzerdi (p=0,725). Çok değişkenli
analizde metastatik bölge sayısı ile mortalite riski istatistiksel anlamlı
artış göstermiştir (p=0,001). Kemoterapi protokolleri ile mortalite riski arası
ilişki yoktur (p=0,472). Kemoterapiden bağımsız olarak stomatit, bulantı-kusma,
nöropati, nötropenik ateş ve nefrotoksisite yan etkileri mortalite riski ile
istatistiksel anlamlı ilişki içindedir (sırasıyla p=0,045, p=0,047, p=0,036,
p=0,02 ve p=0,049).
Sonuç: Çalışmamızda evre IV mide kanserli olgularda 8,7 ay
tüm sağ kalıma ulaşılmıştır. Kemoterapi alt gruplarında ise hem yan etki hem de sağ
kalımlar açısından anlamlı fark
yoktur. Stomatit, bulantı-kusma, nötropenik ateş, nefrotoksisite
ve nöropati yan etkilerinin mortalite riskini arttırması, geriyatrik olgularda
özellikle ağız bakımı, uygun antiemetik tedavi uygulanması, böbrek fonksiyon
testlerininin sıkı takibi ve yeterli hidrasyon, enfeksiyon açısından koruyucu
bariyer tedbirler ve nöropati ilişkili kronik hastalıkların etkin tedavisinin
en az kemoterapi uygulanması kadar önem taşıdığını göstermiştir. Objective: Gastric cancer is responsible for a considerable proportion of all cancer-related deaths. Elderly cancer patients are often ignored in prospective studies in which the efficacy of chemotherapy is evaluated, although more than half of all gastric cancer cases are over the age of 70 years. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of capecitabine-based chemotherapies in geriatric patients with gastric cancer.Method: A total of 81 patients over the age of 65 years who received chemotherapy for metastatic gastric cancer at two oncology centers between 2012 and 2017 were included in the study. The medical records of the patients were evaluated retrospectively, and the patients and their performance status were evaluated using the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system and the World Health Organisation scale, respectively.Results: The mean age was 74 years. The male gender and the adenocarcinoma histological type were seen in higher rates. Most of the patients underwent capecitabine-cisplatin chemotherapy, and the mean follow-up was 42 months. The median overall survival of the groups of patients receiving capecitabine-cisplatin, capecitabine-oxaliplatin and capecitabine was 8 months, 10.7 months and 8.9 months, respectively, indicating no statistically significant differences between the groups (p=0.467). The median overall survival of all patients was found to be 8.7 months. The progression-free survival between the different chemotherapy subgroups was not statistically significant (p=0.59). The most common side effect was found to be anemia. Grade 3-4 adverse effects were similar between the arms of the study (p=0.725). A statistically significant increase was found in the mortality risk with an increased number of metastatic sites in a multivariate analysis (p=0.001). No correlation was found between the chemotherapy protocols and mortality risk (p=0.472). Adverse effects such as stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, neuropathy, neutropenic fever and nephrotoxicity, independent of chemotherapy, were statistically and significantly associated with the mortality risk (p=0.045, p=0.047, p=0.036, p=0.02 and p=0.049, respectively).Conclusions: Our study results show that adverse effects such as stomatitis, nausea/vomiting, neutropenic fever, nephrotoxicity and neuropathy increase the mortality risk which suggest that particularly oral health care, the application of appropriate antiemetic treatments, the close follow-up of kidney function tests and adequate hydration, protective infection barrier measures and effective treatment of neuropathy associated with chronic diseases are as important as chemotherapy in geriatric cases. |
Author | DEĞİRMENCİOĞLU, Serkan OKTAY, Esin ÜNAL, Olçun Ümit |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Serkan orcidid: 0000-0002-1213-2778 surname: DEĞİRMENCİOĞLU fullname: DEĞİRMENCİOĞLU, Serkan – sequence: 2 givenname: Olçun Ümit orcidid: 0000-0001-7698-3574 surname: ÜNAL fullname: ÜNAL, Olçun Ümit – sequence: 3 givenname: Esin orcidid: 0000-0002-5974-6339 surname: OKTAY fullname: OKTAY, Esin |
BookMark | eNo1UE1LAzEUDFLBtnr2GvC8bXaz2SZHKX5BwUvvy2vyIim7SUy2Qv-90epp5s0Mb2AWZOaDR0Lua7YSGyXXxukBJxdXQrCGiysyrzmTlZJSzX45qxrVihuyyPnIWNe1qp2TuA1jhORy8DRYGhIMVENE7SY4OI8UhlJDvzDlU6ZxgMn500h1GItbjuAzdZ7iYDANZzriBHkquqYfhaSCGrzGRGMR0U_5llxbGDLe_eGS7J-f9tvXavf-8rZ93FW6k7zqwGwao6xkutkIKbm1ANA0tTAWGYAUplMHJRgTuuYdWtUZVJYraZQ5oOJL8nB5G1P4PGGe-mM4JV8a-4a3bS0F73hJrS8pnULOCW0fkxshnfua9T-r9v-r9pdV-TeKVnG_ |
Cites_doi | 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4892 10.1586/17474124.2015.1096774 10.1016/S0006-2952(97)00682-5 10.1002/1097-0142(19930615)71:12<3813::AID-CNCR2820711205>3.0.CO;2-5 10.3892/ijo_00000535 10.1007/s00268-010-0935-0 10.3322/caac.21387 10.3143/geriatrics.55.244 10.1007/s10120-015-0457-4 10.1111/ajco.13025 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.5.827 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.044 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO EDSIH FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS |
DOI | 10.5798/dicletip.550235 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ProQuest Turkey Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Turkey Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1308-9889 |
EndPage | 573 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_5798_dicletip_550235 |
GroupedDBID | 29G 2WC 3V. 53G 7X7 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACIHN ADBBV AEAQA AFKRA AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CITATION DIK EDSIH EOJEC ESX FYUFA GJB GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK KQ8 MK0 OBODZ OK1 PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC Q2X RIG RNS SW3 TUS UKHRP 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c683-6ad72d9f80c275883ffaaa2215dfe0aa85d69b95005c136ef96de9f398d9dbe93 |
ISSN | 1300-2945 |
IngestDate | Thu Oct 10 20:29:57 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:52:04 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c683-6ad72d9f80c275883ffaaa2215dfe0aa85d69b95005c136ef96de9f398d9dbe93 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-7698-3574 0000-0002-1213-2778 0000-0002-5974-6339 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2344185363 |
PQID | 2344185363 |
PQPubID | 55023 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2344185363 crossref_primary_10_5798_dicletip_550235 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-09-16 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-09-16 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2019 text: 2019-09-16 day: 16 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Diyarbakir |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Diyarbakir |
PublicationTitle | Dicle tıp dergisi |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Dicle University |
Publisher_xml | – name: Dicle University |
References | ref13 ref12 ref11 ref10 ref2 ref1 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4892 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1586/17474124.2015.1096774 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1016/S0006-2952(97)00682-5 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930615)71:12<3813::AID-CNCR2820711205>3.0.CO;2-5 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000535 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0935-0 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21387 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.55.244 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0457-4 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1111/ajco.13025 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.5.827 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.08.044 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.07.002 |
SSID | ssj0066494 ssib008506797 |
Score | 2.133195 |
Snippet | Background: Gastric cancer is responsible for a considerable
proportion of all cancer-related deaths. Elderly cancer patients are often
ignored in prospective... Objective: Gastric cancer is responsible for a considerable proportion of all cancer-related deaths. Elderly cancer patients are often ignored in prospective... |
SourceID | proquest crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database |
StartPage | 567 |
SubjectTerms | Age Cancer therapies Cardiovascular disease Chemotherapy Gastric cancer Geriatrics Medical prognosis Medical records Metastasis Mortality Neutropenia Patients Studies Survival analysis |
Title | Comparison of oral capecitabine alone versus platinum combinations in elderly metastatic gastric cancer patients |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2344185363 |
Volume | 46 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV07b9swECacFCi6FH2iadOCQ4cCglJJ1ItjajtwkDYtEA_dBIqkDCGObVjS0H_fO5KylAxFO3QhDAqQqLvPxzvq7j5CPuZSVLrKuA_Ou_JjGWsf9x0_CEqVaS6UNFwEi5vs-mc-m8fzyaRnqBrm_qumYQ50jZWz_6Dtw01hAn6DzmEErcP4V3qfjokFPVN_jzlOsm5FiR6lWG9hxGSMrkEO6bbGXHhYCVwdEss1knevfyHBtMCao1p6K4EUHxLTxKTe9w1Zm7F3O8PFeC06qF_CnQe3wGORg6-sV_X-DmRVb1frzhy76v3tgE78Zs-nG8NA4H1fm0_4WQfgNPN39ZCgc9sKg4154_qGu2OL0ORl2apKm3tiFjQkn4xMMAsCP-K2yeSZ7ufALOeWbKi32-7osh6H9cYIJ5bgw-3niaVKebhVJBnH8geF62jr3RlEahFLhl2xzwRYnN8UP2YXxdfL66sj8igCe4YUDbPLq4PZwqZ_GT_E-Wkac8ul7F7EdpTCB35-8Lj7ztB9X8A4OMtn5KmLTOi5hdRzMtGbF-TxN5d78ZLsBmTRbUURWXSMLGqQRS2yaI8sOkYWrTfUIYsOyKIOWdQii_bIekWWF_PldOE7vg5fpjnzU6GySPEqD2QEUWjOqkoIEYFPqSodCJEnKuUlT8Duy5CluuKp0rxiPFdclZqz1-R4Awt9QygAhiWl5OBsijgP0jIORVCWaRXEcRRqdUI-9XIrdrYrSwHRLIq46EVcWBGfkNNeroX7mzZFxGJs2sRS9vbPl9-RJwN4T8lxu-_0e3LUqO6DwcBvJw6Nyg |
link.rule.ids | 315,782,786,27934,27935 |
linkProvider | Flying Publisher |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+oral+capecitabine+alone+versus+platinum+combinations+in+elderly+metastatic+gastric+cancer+patients&rft.jtitle=Dicle+t%C4%B1p+dergisi&rft.au=Degirmencioglu%2C+Serkan&rft.au=%C3%9Cnal%2C+Ol%C3%A7un+%C3%9Cmit&rft.au=Oktay%2C+Esin&rft.date=2019-09-16&rft.pub=Dicle+University&rft.issn=1300-2945&rft.eissn=1308-9889&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=573&rft_id=info:doi/10.5798%2Fdicletip.550235&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1300-2945&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1300-2945&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1300-2945&client=summon |