The role of risk communication in public health interventions. An analysis of risk communication for a community quarantine in Germany to curb the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 16; no. 8; p. e0256113
• Main Authors: Scholz, Juliane, Wetzker, Wibke, Licht, Annika, Heintzmann, Rainer, Scherag, André, Weis, Sebastian, Pletz, Mathias, Betsch, Cornelia, Bauer, Michael, Dickmann, Petra
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 13-08-2021; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Adults; Anesthesiology; Asymptomatic; Biology and life sciences; Communication; Compliance; Control; Disease control; Engineering and Technology; Epidemics; Ethics; Evaluation; Fatalities; Germany; Health promotion; Health risks; Hospitals; Infections; Infectious diseases; Information seeking behavior; Intensive care; Intervention; Medicine; Medicine and Health Sciences; Pandemics; Public health; Public health administration; Quarantine; Questionnaires; Risk analysis; Risk communication; Schiller, Johann Christoph Friedrich von (1759-1805); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Social aspects; Social Sciences; Television; Vaccines; Germany
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256113

Background Separating ill or possibly infectious people from their healthy community is one of the core principles of non-pharmaceutical interventions. However, there is scarce evidence on how to successfully implement quarantine orders. We investigated a community quarantine for an entire village in Germany (Neustadt am Rennsteig, March 2020) with the aim of better understanding the successful implementation of quarantine measures. Methods This cross-sectional survey was conducted in Neustadt am Rennsteig six weeks after the end of a 14-day mandatory community quarantine. The sample size consisted of 562 adults (64% of the community), and the response rate was 295 adults, or 52% (33% of the community). Findings National television was reported as the most important channel of information. Contact with local authorities was very limited, and partners or spouses played a more important role in sharing information. Generally, the self-reported information level was judged to be good (211/289 [73.0%]). The majority of participants (212/289 [73.4%]) approved of the quarantine, and the reported compliance was 217/289 (75.1%). A self-reported higher level of concern as well as a higher level of information correlated positively with both a greater acceptance of quarantine and self-reported compliant behaviour. Interpretation The community quarantine presented a rare opportunity to investigate a public health intervention for an entire community. In order to improve the implementation of public health interventions, public health risk communication activities should be intensified to increase both the information level (potentially leading to better compliance with community quarantine) and the communication level (to facilitate rapport and trust between public health authorities and their communities).