Evaluating Differences in Whole Blood, Serum, and Urine Screening Tests for Zika Virus, Puerto Rico, USA, 2016

We evaluated nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for Zika virus on whole-blood specimens compared with NAAT on serum and urine specimens among asymptomatic pregnant women during the 2015-2016 Puerto Rico Zika outbreak. Using NAAT, more infections were detected in serum and urine than in whole...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Emerging infectious diseases Vol. 27; no. 5; pp. 1505 - 1508
Main Authors: Rosinger, Asher Y, Olson, Samantha M, Ellington, Sascha R, Perez-Padilla, Janice, Simeone, Regina M, Pedati, Caitlin S, Schroeder, Betsy A, Santiago, Gilberto A, Medina, Freddy A, Muñoz-Jordán, Jorge L, Adams, Laura E, Galang, Romeo R, Valencia-Prado, Miguel, Bakkour, Sonia, Colón, Candimar, Goodwin, Mary, Meaney-Delman, Dana, Read, Jennifer S, Petersen, Lyle R, Jamieson, Denise J, Deseda, Carmen C, Honein, Margaret A, Rivera-García, Brenda, Shapiro-Mendoza, Carrie K
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States U.S. National Center for Infectious Diseases 01-05-2021
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We evaluated nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for Zika virus on whole-blood specimens compared with NAAT on serum and urine specimens among asymptomatic pregnant women during the 2015-2016 Puerto Rico Zika outbreak. Using NAAT, more infections were detected in serum and urine than in whole blood specimens.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1080-6040
1080-6059
DOI:10.3201/eid2705.203960