KEY CONCLUSIONS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL URBAN LAND SURFACE MODEL COMPARISON PROJECT

• Published in: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol. 96; no. 5; pp. 805 - 822
• Main Authors: Best, M. J., Grimond, C. S. B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston American Meteorological Society 01-05-2015
• Subjects: Atmospheric boundary layer; Atmospheric models; Buildings; Canyons; Climate change; Climate models; Environmental aspects; Heat flux; Heating; Hurricanes; Measurement; Meteorology; Meteors; Metropolitan areas; Modeling; Mortality; Natural history; Parametric models; Rural areas; Solar radiation; Urban areas; Urban environments; Urban heat islands; Weather
• DOI: 10.1175/bams-d-14-00122.1
• EISSN: 1520-0477
• ISSN: 0003-0007

The First International Urban Land Surface Model Comparison was designed to identify three aspects of the urban surface–atmosphere interactions: 1) the dominant physical processes, 2) the level of complexity required to model these, and 3) the parameter requirements for such a model. Offline simulations from 32 land surface schemes, with varying complexity, contributed to the comparison. Model results were analyzed within a framework of physical classifications and over four stages. The results show that the following are important urban processes: i) multiple reflections of shortwave radiation within street canyons; ii) reduction in the amount of visible sky from within the canyon, which impacts the net longwave radiation; iii) the contrast in surface temperatures between building roofs and street canyons; and iv) evaporation from vegetation. Models that use an appropriate bulk albedo based on multiple solar reflections, represent building roof surfaces separately from street canyons and include a representation of vegetation demonstrate more skill, but require parameter information on the albedo, height of the buildings relative to the width of the streets (height to width ratio), the fraction of building roofs compared to street canyons from a plan view (plan area fraction), and the fraction of the surface that is vegetated. These results, while based on a single site and less than 18 months of data, have implications for the future design of urban land surface models, the data that need to be measured in urban observational campaigns, and what needs to be included in initiatives for regional and global parameter databases.