The Association of Baseball Pitch Delivery and Kinematic Sequence on Stresses at the Shoulder and Elbow Joints

• Published in: Journal of sports science & medicine Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 94 - 100
• Main Authors: Scarborough, Donna Moxley, Leonard, Nicholas K, Mayer, Lucas W, Oh, Luke S, Berkson, Eric M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Turkey Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 01-03-2021; Uludag University
• Subjects: Baseball; Biomechanics; Elbow; Kinematics; Motion capture; Physiological aspects; Physiological research; Pitching (Baseball); Shoulder; Shoulder joint; Stress (Physiology); Velocity; United States; United States > US; stretch; Windup; pitching biomechanics; elbow torque; shoulder torque
• ISSN: 1303-2968; 1303-2968
• DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2021.94

Although there is a commonly held belief within the baseball community that delivery from the stretch confers more stress at the elbow and shoulder joints than delivery from the windup, there remains little evidence in the literature investigating this hypothesis. This study aimed to help address this gap in the literature by studying both intra-pitcher kinematic sequence variability, and intra-pitcher joint torque variability when throwing from the windup vs. the stretch. We hypothesized that 1) each pitchers' kinematic sequence would remain similar whether throwing from the windup or stretch, and 2) Kinematic sequence would influence peak arm torque more than delivery method. This cross-sectional 3D biomechanical study included 88 pitches thrown by ten (6 collegiate, 4 high school) pitchers with a mean age of 17.60 ± 2.63 years. Pitch velocity, throwing shoulder/elbow torques and the kinematic sequence of each pitch utilizing segmental peak angular velocities were captured. No statistically significant differences in ball velocity (p = 0.17), peak shoulder external rotation torque (p = 0.80), shoulder extension torque (p = 0.97), or elbow valgus torque (p = 0.83) were found between delivery approaches. Three primary kinematic sequences were identified. Shoulder external rotation torque [
(53,2) = 10.992, ɳ
= .293, p < 0.00], shoulder extension torque [
(53,2) = 15.517, ɳ
= .369, p < 0.00] and elbow valgus torque [
(53,2) = 9.994, ɳ
= .274, p < 0.00] did vary significantly across these three kinematic sequence patterns. Our data suggest that the kinematic sequence influences shoulder and elbow torque more than the delivery approach. Instructing ideal kinematic sequence may be more influential for injury avoidance than delivery method.