Engagement, representativeness and legitimacy in the development of food and nutrition policy

► Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders. ► There is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. ► The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness. ► The dominant framewor...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Food policy Vol. 36; no. 4; pp. 490 - 498
Main Authors:	Timotijevic, L., Barnett, J., Raats, M.M.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01-08-2011 Elsevier Elsevier Science Ltd
Series:	Food Policy
Subjects:	Citizen participation Decision making models England Food Food policy Food safety Food supply Legitimacy Nutrition Nutrition policy Older people Public health Public participation Public policy Representativeness Representativeness Public participation Stakeholders Food Nutrition policy Legitimacy Stakeholder Stakeholders United Kingdom United Kingdom > UK British Isles, England Representativeness Nutrition policy Legitimacy Stakeholders Public participation Food
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Abstract	► Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders. ► There is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. ► The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness. ► The dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. In a policy environment that contains structures to enable public engagement, the validity of expressions of public opinion and concern are in part legitimated through constructions of their representativeness. The current paper examined the ways in which various organisations involved in food and nutrition policy development negotiated the legitimacy of their inclusion in policy processes through claims about who they represented and how, with a specific focus upon older people (aged 60+) as an example of the “hard to reach”. This study is set in the context of theoretical considerations around the forms of representativeness that have been identified in the literature. A thematic analysis of 52 interviews with organisations and stakeholders active in the area of food and nutrition policy in England, UK explores these competing modalities of representation and how they are used both to claim legitimacy for self and to discount the claims of others. Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders and there is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness, suggesting that the dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. This highlights the way in which public views can be distanced from the framing of policy questions.
AbstractList	In a policy environment that contains structures to enable public engagement, the validity of expressions of public opinion and concern are in part legitimated through constructions of their representativeness. The current paper examined the ways in which various organisations involved in food and nutrition policy development negotiated the legitimacy of their inclusion in policy processes through claims about who they represented and how, with a specific focus upon older people (aged 60+) as an example of the "hard to reach". This study is set in the context of theoretical considerations around the forms of representativeness that have been identified in the literature. A thematic analysis of 52 interviews with organisations and stakeholders active in the area of food and nutrition policy in England, UK explores these competing modalities of representation and how they are used both to claim legitimacy for self and to discount the claims of others. Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders and there is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness, suggesting that the dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. This highlights the way in which public views can be distanced from the framing of policy questions. [Copyright Elsevier B.V.] In a policy environment that contains structures to enable public engagement, the validity of expressions of public opinion and concern are in part legitimated through constructions of their representativeness. The current paper examined the ways in which various organisations involved in food and nutrition policy development negotiated the legitimacy of their inclusion in policy processes through claims about who they represented and how, with a specific focus upon older people (aged 60+) as an example of the "hard to reach". This study is set in the context of theoretical considerations around the forms of representativeness that have been identified in the literature. A thematic analysis of 52 interviews with organisations and stakeholders active in the area of food and nutrition policy in England, UK explores these competing modalities of representation and how they are used both to claim legitimacy for self and to discount the claims of others. Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders and there is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness, suggesting that the dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. This highlights the way in which public views can be distanced from the framing of policy questions. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] In a policy environment that contains structures to enable public engagement, the validity of expressions of public opinion and concern are in part legitimated through constructions of their representativeness. The current paper examined the ways in which various organisations involved in food and nutrition policy development negotiated the legitimacy of their inclusion in policy processes through claims about who they represented and how, with a specific focus upon older people (aged 60+) as an example of the "hard to reach". This study is set in the context of theoretical considerations around the forms of representativeness that have been identified in the literature. A thematic analysis of 52 interviews with organisations and stakeholders active in the area of food and nutrition policy in England, UK explores these competing modalities of representation and how they are used both to claim legitimacy for self and to discount the claims of others. Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders and there is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness, suggesting that the dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. This highlights the way in which public views can be distanced from the framing of policy questions. In a policy environment that contains structures to enable public engagement, the validity of expressions of public opinion and concern are in part legitimated through constructions of their representativeness. The current paper examined the ways in which various organisations involved in food and nutrition policy development negotiated the legitimacy of their inclusion in policy processes through claims about who they represented and how, with a specific focus upon older people (aged 60+) as an example of the ''hard to reach''. This study is set in the context of theoretical considerations around the forms of representativeness that have been identified in the literature. A thematic analysis of 52 interviews with organisations and stakeholders active in the area of food and nutrition policy in England, UK explores these competing modalities of representation and how they are used both to claim legitimacy for self and to discount the claims of others. Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders and there is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness, suggesting that the dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. This highlights the way in which public views can be distanced from the framing of policy questions. All rights reserved, Elsevier ► Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders. ► There is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. ► The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness. ► The dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. In a policy environment that contains structures to enable public engagement, the validity of expressions of public opinion and concern are in part legitimated through constructions of their representativeness. The current paper examined the ways in which various organisations involved in food and nutrition policy development negotiated the legitimacy of their inclusion in policy processes through claims about who they represented and how, with a specific focus upon older people (aged 60+) as an example of the “hard to reach”. This study is set in the context of theoretical considerations around the forms of representativeness that have been identified in the literature. A thematic analysis of 52 interviews with organisations and stakeholders active in the area of food and nutrition policy in England, UK explores these competing modalities of representation and how they are used both to claim legitimacy for self and to discount the claims of others. Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders and there is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different representativeness claims. The notions of expert representativeness permeate other modalities of representativeness, suggesting that the dominant framework for food and nutrition policy development is based upon technocratic models of decision-making. This highlights the way in which public views can be distanced from the framing of policy questions.
Author	Timotijevic, L. Barnett, J. Raats, M.M.
Author_xml	– sequence: 1 givenname: L. surname: Timotijevic fullname: Timotijevic, L. email: l.timotijevic@surrey.ac.uk organization: Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK – sequence: 2 givenname: J. surname: Barnett fullname: Barnett, J. organization: Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, Kingston Lane, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: M.M. surname: Raats fullname: Raats, M.M. organization: Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK
BackLink	http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejfpoli/v_3a36_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a490-498.htm$$DView record in RePEc
BookMark	eNqFkU1v3CAQhlGVSt1s-xMqWb30UruDwdicqipKvxSpl1wrRPCwwfKCC-xK---Ds1EPvSzSMByed5iZ95pc-eCRkPcUGgpUfJ4aG8K4hLlpgdIGeAPQvSIbOvSs7kTXX5ENMBC1pLJ9Q65TmgCgBQ4b8ufW7_QO9-jzpyriEjGVp87uiB5TqrQfqxl3Lru9NqfK-So_YjXiEeewrKoq2Gr9_pn0hxwLGnxVunHm9Ja8tnpO-O4lb8n9t9v7mx_13e_vP2--3tVGgMw1Wg5913ajNdgD1VB6towPgzQP1lLRta3l1j5IsFz2TMtRdEJITUU_ApNsSz6eyy4x_D1gymrvksF51h7DISkJtO_oINuL5CBFS9e9XSZ7USpyygv54T9yCofoy7wFKjOw9WxJd4ZMDClFtGqJZaXxpCio1UU1qRcX1eqiAq6Ki0X366wr3qD5J0LEya47VkfFNBPlOpV4VjLtSvASy5olKC4H9Zj3pdiXczEsXhwdRpWMQ29wdBFNVmNwF9p5AtWfwyg
CitedBy_id	crossref_primary_10_3945_an_112_003160 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2014_07_006 crossref_primary_10_1093_heapro_daaa045 crossref_primary_10_1080_10408398_2012_749209 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2015_00029 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu16070918 crossref_primary_10_1080_1389224X_2017_1394885 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrurstud_2019_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2019_03_050
Cites_doi	10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144118 10.1080/13549839908725601 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00245.x 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.05.003 10.3152/147154303781780542 10.1111/1467-9299.00253 10.1057/palgrave.development.1100031 10.1177/097172189900400106 10.1111/1467-9299.00352 10.1177/01622439073075941 10.1017/S0144686X02008632 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00145.x 10.1377/hlthaff.12.2.104
ContentType	Journal Article
Copyright	2011 Elsevier Ltd Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2011
Copyright_xml	– notice: 2011 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2011
DBID	DKI X2L AAYXX CITATION 7ST 7TQ 8BJ C1K DHY DON FQK JBE SOI
DOI	10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005
DatabaseName	RePEc IDEAS RePEc CrossRef Environment Abstracts PAIS Index International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management PAIS International PAIS International (Ovid) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences Environment Abstracts
DatabaseTitle	CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Environment Abstracts PAIS International Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList	PAIS International International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) Environment Abstracts
DeliveryMethod	fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline	Economics Public Health
EISSN	1873-5657
EndPage	498
ExternalDocumentID	2406485581 10_1016_j_foodpol_2011_04_005 eeejfpoli_v_3a36_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a490_498_htm S0306919211000649
Genre	Feature
GeographicLocations	United Kingdom--UK British Isles, England
GeographicLocations_xml	– name: United Kingdom--UK – name: British Isles, England
GroupedDBID	--K --M -~X .~1 0R~ 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29H 3EH 3R3 4.4 457 4G. 5GY 5VS 63O 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JO AABNK AABVA AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFFL AAFJI AAIAV AAIKC AAIKJ AAKOC AALCJ AALRI AAMNW AAOAW AAPFB AAQFI AAQXK AATLK AAXUO AAYJJ AAYOK ABFRF ABGRD ABJNI ABMAC ABMMH ABTAH ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIUM ACRLP ACROA ADBBV ADEZE ADFHU ADMUD ADQTV AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AEQOU AEYQN AFKWA AFODL AFRAH AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGTHC AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIIAU AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJWLA AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AXLSJ AZFZN BEHZQ BEZPJ BGSCR BKOJK BLXMC BNTGB BPUDD BULVW BZJEE CBWCG CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HLV HMB HMY HVGLF HZ~ H~9 IHE IXIXF J1W KOM LW9 LY5 M3Y M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAB SCC SDF SDG SEB SEE SES SEW SPCBC SSA SSB SSF SSO SSS SSZ T5K ULY UNMZH WH7 WUQ Y6R YK3 ZY4 ~G- ~KM 08R 0R 1 8P AAPBV ABPTK ADALY DKI G- HZ IPNFZ K KM M PQEST X X2L AAHBH AAXKI AAYXX AFJKZ AKRWK CITATION 7ST 7TQ 8BJ C1K DHY DON FQK JBE SOI
ID	FETCH-LOGICAL-c609t-ef407525dfce701a0657f34889cbff16522f4ffb90f4973a9d65669a167d0393
ISSN	0306-9192
IngestDate	Fri Oct 25 03:30:30 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 05:31:50 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 06:43:06 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 16:05:57 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 16:55:48 EDT 2024 Wed Aug 18 03:07:49 EDT 2021 Fri Feb 23 02:33:14 EST 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess	false
IsOpenAccess	true
IsPeerReviewed	true
IsScholarly	true
Issue	4
Keywords	Representativeness Nutrition policy Legitimacy Stakeholders Public participation Food
Language	English
LinkModel	OpenURL
MergedId	FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c609t-ef407525dfce701a0657f34889cbff16522f4ffb90f4973a9d65669a167d0393
Notes	ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2
OpenAccessLink	https://openresearch.surrey.ac.uk/view/delivery/44SUR_INST/12139588350002346/13140522240002346
PQID	878893333
PQPubID	105622
PageCount	9
ParticipantIDs	proquest_miscellaneous_901751892 proquest_miscellaneous_896211873 proquest_miscellaneous_876189414 proquest_journals_878893333 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foodpol_2011_04_005 repec_primary_eeejfpoli_v_3a36_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a490_498_htm elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_foodpol_2011_04_005
PublicationCentury	2000
PublicationDate	2011-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD	2011-08-01
PublicationDate_xml	– month: 08 year: 2011 text: 2011-08-01 day: 01
PublicationDecade	2010
PublicationPlace	Kidlington
PublicationPlace_xml	– name: Kidlington
PublicationSeriesTitle	Food Policy
PublicationTitle	Food policy
PublicationYear	2011
Publisher	Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Elsevier Science Ltd
Publisher_xml	– name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier – name: Elsevier Science Ltd
References	European Commission, 2001. European Governance: A White Paper. COM 2001 428 Final, 25 July. Rayner (b0210) 2007; 7 Parkinson (b0195) 2004; 6 Lang, Heasman (b0165) 2004; 47 Lewis (b0170) 2000 Bardasi, Jenkins, Rigg (b0010) 2002; 22 Davies (b0055) 1999; 4 James (b0125) 1997 Mulgan (b0190) 2005; 1 Pitkin (b0200) 1967 European Commission, 2006. Green Paper: European Transparency Initiative. COM 2006 194 Final, 3 May. Dryzek (b0075) 2000 Lang (b0155) 1997 Callon (b0040) 1999; 4 Hills, Le Grand, Piachaud (b0100) 2002 Marsden, Flynn, Harrison (b0180) 2000 Squires (b0225) 1998 Martin (b0185) 2007; 30 Stigoe, J., Wilsdon, J., 2006. Engagement Evidence and Expertise. Balancing Different Forms of Knowledge in Regulatory Decision-making. A Discussion Paper for the Food Standards Agency. DEMOS Draft 2.0 14 September. Atkinson, Flint (b0005) 2001; 33 Brakertz, N., 2007. Who is Hard to Reach and Why? ISR Working Paper. Kaplan, Frosch (b0145) 2005; 1 Barnes, Newman, Knops, Sullivan (b0020) 2003; 81 Williams, M., 2002. Why Doesn’t the Government Respond to the Participating Public? Vanguard Online, December. European Commission, 2002. Communication from the Commission: Towards a Reinforced Culture of Consultation and Dialogue – General Principles and Minimum Standards of Consultation of Interested Parties by the Commission. COM 2002 704 Final, 11 December. (b0140) 2002 Jasanoff (b0130) 2003; 30 Lang, Barling, Caraher (b0160) 2002 DETR (b0070) 1999 Pratchett (b0205) 1999 Young (b0250) 2000 . Horlick-Jones, T.J, Walls, Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N.F., Poortinga, W., O’Riordan, T., 2004. A Deliberative Future? An Independent Evaluation of the GM Nation? Public Debate about the Possible Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain, 2003. Working Paper 04-02. Centre for Environmental Risk: University of East Anglia, Norwich. Brown (b0030) 2006; 14 Rose (b0215) 1999 Irwin (b0115) 2007 Chilvers (b0045) 2008; 33 Jasanoff (b0135) 2005 Walsh, Rudd, Moeykens, Moloney (b0240) 1993; 12 Barling, Lang (b0015) 2003 Department of Health (b0060) 2001 DETR, 1998. Enhancing Public Participation in Local Government. Research Report Prepared by V. Lowndes et al., London. Lowndes, Pratchett, Stoker (b0175) 2001; 79 Brown, Lentsch, Weingart (b0035) 2005 Irwin, Michael (b0120) 2003 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0065 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0085 Department of Health (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0060) 2001 James (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0125) 1997 Callon (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0040) 1999; 4 Bardasi (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0010) 2002; 22 Pratchett (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0205) 1999 Marsden (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0180) 2000 Jasanoff (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0130) 2003; 30 Walsh (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0240) 1993; 12 Atkinson (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0005) 2001; 33 Lang (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0160) 2002 Irwin (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0120) 2003 (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0140) 2002 Brown (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0035) 2005 Lowndes (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0175) 2001; 79 Rayner (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0210) 2007; 7 Rose (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0215) 1999 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0230 Brown (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0030) 2006; 14 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0095 Parkinson (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0195) 2004; 6 Irwin (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0115) 2007 Barnes (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0020) 2003; 81 Lang (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0155) 1997 Mulgan (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0190) 2005; 1 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0090 Kaplan (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0145) 2005; 1 Martin (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0185) 2007; 30 Jasanoff (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0135) 2005 Davies (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0055) 1999; 4 Dryzek (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0075) 2000 Lewis (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0170) 2000 Young (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0250) 2000 DETR (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0070) 1999 Pitkin (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0200) 1967 Chilvers (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0045) 2008; 33 Lang (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0165) 2004; 47 Hills (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0100) 2002 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0105 Barling (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0015) 2003 Squires (10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0225) 1998 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0025 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0245
References_xml	– year: 1999 ident: b0070 article-title: Local Government Act 1999. Part I Better Value contributor: fullname: DETR – year: 2000 ident: b0180 article-title: Consuming Interests: The Social Provision of Foods contributor: fullname: Harrison – volume: 4 start-page: 295 year: 1999 end-page: 316 ident: b0055 article-title: Where do we go from here? Environmental focus groups and planning policy formation publication-title: Local Environment contributor: fullname: Davies – volume: 1 start-page: 525 year: 2005 end-page: 556 ident: b0145 article-title: Decision making in medicine and health care publication-title: Annual Review of Clinical Psychology contributor: fullname: Frosch – year: 1999 ident: b0215 article-title: Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought contributor: fullname: Rose – volume: 81 start-page: 379 year: 2003 end-page: 399 ident: b0020 article-title: Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation publication-title: Public Administration contributor: fullname: Sullivan – year: 1997 ident: b0125 article-title: Food Standards Agency contributor: fullname: James – year: 2000 ident: b0075 article-title: Deliberative Democracy and Beyond contributor: fullname: Dryzek – volume: 30 start-page: 35 year: 2007 end-page: 54 ident: b0185 article-title: Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and teh publics of public participation in healthcare publication-title: Sociology of Health and illness contributor: fullname: Martin – year: 2000 ident: b0250 article-title: Inclusion and Democracy contributor: fullname: Young – year: 1967 ident: b0200 article-title: The Concept of Representation contributor: fullname: Pitkin – year: 2002 ident: b0140 publication-title: Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives – volume: 22 start-page: 131 year: 2002 end-page: 159 ident: b0010 article-title: Retirement and the income of older people: a British perspective publication-title: Ageing & Society contributor: fullname: Rigg – start-page: 238 year: 1997 end-page: 260 ident: b0155 article-title: Going public: food campaigns during 1980s and 1990s publication-title: Nutrition Scientists and Nutrition Policy in the 20th Century contributor: fullname: Lang – year: 2003 ident: b0120 article-title: Science, Social Theory & Public Knowledge contributor: fullname: Michael – year: 2000 ident: b0170 article-title: Race, Gender and Social Welfare: Encounters in a Post-colonial Society contributor: fullname: Lewis – volume: 47 start-page: 64 year: 2004 end-page: 74 ident: b0165 article-title: Diet and nutrition policy: a clash of ideas or an investment? publication-title: Development contributor: fullname: Heasman – year: 2003 ident: b0015 article-title: A reluctant food policy? The first five years of food policy under Labour contributor: fullname: Lang – volume: 4 start-page: 81 year: 1999 end-page: 94 ident: b0040 article-title: The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge publication-title: Science, Technology and Society contributor: fullname: Callon – volume: 33 start-page: 1 year: 2001 ident: b0005 article-title: Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies publication-title: Social Research Update contributor: fullname: Flint – year: 2002 ident: b0160 article-title: Food, social policy and the environment: towards a new model publication-title: Environmental Issues and Social Welfare contributor: fullname: Caraher – year: 1998 ident: b0225 article-title: In different voices: deliberative democracy and aesthetic politics publication-title: The Politics of Postmodernity contributor: fullname: Squires – volume: 14 start-page: 203 year: 2006 end-page: 255 ident: b0030 article-title: Survey article: citizen panels and the concept of representation publication-title: Journal of Political Philosophy contributor: fullname: Brown – volume: 79 start-page: 205 year: 2001 end-page: 222 ident: b0175 article-title: Trends in Public Participation: Part 1 – Local Government Perspectives publication-title: Public Administration contributor: fullname: Stoker – volume: 1 start-page: 215 year: 2005 end-page: 226 ident: b0190 article-title: Government, knowledge and the business of policy making: the potential and limits of evidence-based policy publication-title: The Policy Press contributor: fullname: Mulgan – volume: 33 start-page: 419 year: 2008 end-page: 451 ident: b0045 article-title: Deliberating competence: theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice publication-title: Science Technology & Human Values contributor: fullname: Chilvers – year: 2005 ident: b0035 article-title: Representation, expertise and the german parliament: a comparison of three advisory institutes publication-title: Democratizatio of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-making contributor: fullname: Weingart – volume: 30 start-page: 157 year: 2003 end-page: 162 ident: b0130 article-title: (No) Accounting for expertise? publication-title: Science and Public Policy contributor: fullname: Jasanoff – year: 2005 ident: b0135 article-title: Judgment under siege: the three-body problem of expert legitimacy publication-title: Democratization of Expertise? Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-making contributor: fullname: Jasanoff – volume: 12 start-page: 104 year: 1993 end-page: 119 ident: b0240 article-title: Social marketing for public health publication-title: Health Affairs contributor: fullname: Moloney – volume: 6 start-page: 370 year: 2004 end-page: 388 ident: b0195 article-title: Hearing voices: negotiating representation claims in public deliberation 1 publication-title: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations contributor: fullname: Parkinson – year: 2002 ident: b0100 article-title: Understanding Social Exclusion contributor: fullname: Piachaud – volume: 7 start-page: 165 year: 2007 end-page: 172 ident: b0210 article-title: The rise of risk and the decline of politics publication-title: Environmental Hazards contributor: fullname: Rayner – start-page: 50 year: 2007 end-page: 56 ident: b0115 article-title: Beyond the toolkit: bringing engagement into practice publication-title: Engaging Science, Thoughts, Deeds, Analysis and Action contributor: fullname: Irwin – year: 2001 ident: b0060 article-title: Involving Patients and the Public in Healthcare: A Discussion Document contributor: fullname: Department of Health – year: 1999 ident: b0205 article-title: Renewing Local Democracy?: The Modernisation Agenda in British Local Government contributor: fullname: Pratchett – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0170 contributor: fullname: Lewis – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0075 contributor: fullname: Dryzek – ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0085 – volume: 1 start-page: 525 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0145 article-title: Decision making in medicine and health care publication-title: Annual Review of Clinical Psychology doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144118 contributor: fullname: Kaplan – volume: 4 start-page: 295 issue: 3 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0055 article-title: Where do we go from here? Environmental focus groups and planning policy formation publication-title: Local Environment doi: 10.1080/13549839908725601 contributor: fullname: Davies – ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0230 – volume: 14 start-page: 203 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0030 article-title: Survey article: citizen panels and the concept of representation publication-title: Journal of Political Philosophy doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00245.x contributor: fullname: Brown – year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0215 contributor: fullname: Rose – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0160 article-title: Food, social policy and the environment: towards a new model contributor: fullname: Lang – volume: 7 start-page: 165 issue: 2 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0210 article-title: The rise of risk and the decline of politics publication-title: Environmental Hazards doi: 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.05.003 contributor: fullname: Rayner – start-page: 238 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0155 article-title: Going public: food campaigns during 1980s and 1990s contributor: fullname: Lang – ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0025 – volume: 30 start-page: 157 issue: 3 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0130 article-title: (No) Accounting for expertise? publication-title: Science and Public Policy doi: 10.3152/147154303781780542 contributor: fullname: Jasanoff – volume: 79 start-page: 205 issue: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0175 article-title: Trends in Public Participation: Part 1 – Local Government Perspectives publication-title: Public Administration doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00253 contributor: fullname: Lowndes – year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0125 contributor: fullname: James – ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0090 – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0140 – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0120 contributor: fullname: Irwin – year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0035 article-title: Representation, expertise and the german parliament: a comparison of three advisory institutes contributor: fullname: Brown – ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0245 – volume: 47 start-page: 64 issue: 2 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0165 article-title: Diet and nutrition policy: a clash of ideas or an investment? publication-title: Development doi: 10.1057/palgrave.development.1100031 contributor: fullname: Lang – volume: 4 start-page: 81 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0040 article-title: The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge publication-title: Science, Technology and Society doi: 10.1177/097172189900400106 contributor: fullname: Callon – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0180 contributor: fullname: Marsden – year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0015 contributor: fullname: Barling – volume: 81 start-page: 379 issue: 2 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0020 article-title: Constituting ‘the public’ in public participation publication-title: Public Administration doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00352 contributor: fullname: Barnes – start-page: 50 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0115 article-title: Beyond the toolkit: bringing engagement into practice contributor: fullname: Irwin – volume: 33 start-page: 419 issue: 3 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0045 article-title: Deliberating competence: theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice publication-title: Science Technology & Human Values doi: 10.1177/01622439073075941 contributor: fullname: Chilvers – year: 1967 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0200 contributor: fullname: Pitkin – ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0065 – year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0205 contributor: fullname: Pratchett – volume: 22 start-page: 131 issue: 2002 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0010 article-title: Retirement and the income of older people: a British perspective publication-title: Ageing & Society doi: 10.1017/S0144686X02008632 contributor: fullname: Bardasi – volume: 30 start-page: 35 issue: 1 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0185 article-title: Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and teh publics of public participation in healthcare publication-title: Sociology of Health and illness doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x contributor: fullname: Martin – volume: 1 start-page: 215 issue: 2 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0190 article-title: Government, knowledge and the business of policy making: the potential and limits of evidence-based policy publication-title: The Policy Press contributor: fullname: Mulgan – ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0105 – volume: 6 start-page: 370 issue: 3 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0195 article-title: Hearing voices: negotiating representation claims in public deliberation 1 publication-title: The British Journal of Politics and International Relations doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2004.00145.x contributor: fullname: Parkinson – volume: 12 start-page: 104 issue: 2 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0240 article-title: Social marketing for public health publication-title: Health Affairs doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.2.104 contributor: fullname: Walsh – year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0250 contributor: fullname: Young – volume: 33 start-page: 1 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0005 article-title: Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies publication-title: Social Research Update contributor: fullname: Atkinson – ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0095 – year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0225 article-title: In different voices: deliberative democracy and aesthetic politics contributor: fullname: Squires – year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0135 article-title: Judgment under siege: the three-body problem of expert legitimacy contributor: fullname: Jasanoff – year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0060 contributor: fullname: Department of Health – year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0070 contributor: fullname: DETR – year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005_b0100 contributor: fullname: Hills
SSID	ssj0002040
Score	2.0361352
Snippet	► Different scripts of representation are deployed by various stakeholders. ► There is evidence of the strategic and the simultaneous deployment of different... In a policy environment that contains structures to enable public engagement, the validity of expressions of public opinion and concern are in part legitimated...
SourceID	proquest crossref repec elsevier
SourceType	Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher
StartPage	490
SubjectTerms	Citizen participation Decision making models England Food Food policy Food safety Food supply Legitimacy Nutrition Nutrition policy Older people Public health Public participation Public policy Representativeness Representativeness Public participation Stakeholders Food Nutrition policy Legitimacy Stakeholder Stakeholders United Kingdom
Title	Engagement, representativeness and legitimacy in the development of food and nutrition policy
URI	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2011.04.005 http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejfpoli/v_3a36_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a4_3ap_3a490-498.htm https://www.proquest.com/docview/878893333 https://search.proquest.com/docview/876189414 https://search.proquest.com/docview/896211873 https://search.proquest.com/docview/901751892
Volume	36
hasFullText	1
inHoldings	1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link	http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3LbtswTEiTw3YZ9sSyboMOO86eH4plHYsuRVdsO6w59DIIqi12CVqnaJwC_fuRlvwYuu4FLICdQKETiaQoiuKDsTdpkaSQRyIQYMh0AyJQkIrAJtbEyM8WLMU7Hx7Lzyf5-7mYj0atH1ff9l8pjW1Ia4qc_Qtqdz-KDfgZaY53pDre_4ju8-rM-7MQ9pqclT6-yIs1spSf27NlvbygUu_ez7HsnYdIfwRKdkyQVZutvynnUPxwCHxAQIPmxpuXnPtWuNo2ldM_hr2l9KryLsFHXeMXY2pn7Q4_hUP7gzOoDuwPXWBM74XUBGNFGcpRV-YutE625jIN6JR1KHxd9hPPZGIgSYWrIuoXZeFKVd-S9870sAoJKzhen5KVEqLP-gWuczs8pm5RryhPHupiaodNEhRQYswmex_mJ0fdGp5ETShtN4w-9uvdT__sLq1msGuZIMVtMVBeFg_ZA7_r4HuOXR6xka0es3ttUPrmCfvas81bfptpOLIC75mGLyuOTMMHTMPXwKnHDWTHNNxxx1O2OJgv9g8DX3kjKLJI1YEF3OfPklkJhZVRbFBPlTiD81wVpwBxhko7CIBTFYFQMjWqpG2BMnEmSwr2fsbG1bqyzxmXM4QwuBzbohSk-6C6DYWEPLFWQgRTFraI05cuv4puHQ9X2mNaE6Z1JDRiesryFr3aK4lO-dPIE797dLclh_YzdqNziaNK8TVlvPsWRSydm5nKrrcEksW5ErH4BQiOKyYGvxsEFW864lTJlO03rNCN11q7AqKHvtapSTO83eDV9Dw1S7wEXpf0riKNU0F_qy9e_Dsedtn9fiK_ZOP6amtfsZ1NuX3t58F3DmzRbg
link.rule.ids	315,782,786,27934,27935
linkProvider	Elsevier
openUrl	ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engagement%2C+representativeness+and+legitimacy+in+the+development+of+food+and+nutrition+policy&rft.jtitle=Food+policy&rft.au=Timotijevic%2C+L.&rft.au=Barnett%2C+J.&rft.au=Raats%2C+M.M.&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0306-9192&rft.eissn=1873-5657&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=490&rft.epage=498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.foodpol.2011.04.005&rft.externalDocID=S0306919211000649
thumbnail_l	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0306-9192&client=summon
thumbnail_m	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0306-9192&client=summon
thumbnail_s	http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0306-9192&client=summon