Modulation of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis by VLA-2 Blockade
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Adhesion molecules play important roles in cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions in inflammation. Blocking the interaction between inflammatory cells and vascular endothelia can...
Saved in:
Published in: | Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 45 - 55 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-01-2007
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Adhesion molecules play important roles in cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions in inflammation. Blocking the interaction between inflammatory cells and vascular endothelia can prevent cell entry into tissues and harmful inflammatory responses, that is, autoimmunity, but could also limit immunosurveillance by anti‐viral T cells in sites of infection or latency. Development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients treated with antibody against very late antigen (VLA)‐4 prompted us to explore an alternative therapeutic approach. We used an antibody against the integrin α2, VLA‐2, that interacts with ECM, not vascular endothelium. SJL/J mice were sensitized with myelin proteolipid protein (PLP)139–151 peptide to induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model for MS. Treatment of mice with VLA‐2 antibody suppressed clinical signs and CNS inflammation of EAE, when antibody was given immediately after disease onset. In contrast, VLA‐4 or VLA‐2 antibody treatment of mice during the priming or remission phase of EAE had minor effects on the disease’s clinical course. No differences were found in lymphoproliferative responses to PLP139–151 among treatment groups. Data suggest that blocking cell–ECM interactions can be an alternative therapy for MS. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-ZFX430LD-4 ArticleID:BPA042 istex:8772DBDDECC08D40825783919B966602AFF9520D ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1015-6305 1750-3639 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2006.00042.x |